Re: ports/160273 and ports/160272

2011-09-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
ry-pr.cgi?pr=ports/160273 That was mistake and it should be revived and fixed with the patch from the PR. Eugene Grosbein ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail t

Re: ports/160273 and ports/160272

2011-09-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
18.09.2011 04:46, Eugene Grosbein пишет: > 18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет: >> Hi, >> >> now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper? >> >> I'm currently usure what to do with these PRs. > > I don't get why A

Re: www/joomla3 port installs from GitHub, why?

2018-05-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
20.05.2018 18:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > I am curious as to why the www/joomla3 port installs from GitHub, looks > like the port is better for Joomla code development than to run a CMS. > > There are LOTS of files in the port install that is not needed to run > Joomla. > > I thought the rec

Re: www/joomla3 port installs from GitHub, why?

2018-05-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
21.05.2018 2:02, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> I may look into changing it, but if you generate a patch, I'll look at it. > > Easiest way to understand what I mean is to compare the official download at > https://downloads.joomla.org/cms/joomla3/3-8-7/Joomla_3-8-7-Stable-Full_Package.zip?format=z

Re: Pause pkg install messages

2018-05-24 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 24.05.2018 15:08, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > The first thing me and probably many other do after install is > pkg install xxx yyy zzz > from console (meaning no scrollback buffer). > > With xorg and friends this means hundreds of packets. After install all the > pkg messages are display

Re: mail/thunderbird fails on link with latest security/nss

2018-05-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
26.05.2018 18:18, Jonathan Chen пишет: > Hi, > > With the recent update to security/nss, mail/thunderbird build > currently fails on 11-STABLE/amd64 with: > > [...] > Executing: /usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++11 -o plugin-container > -Qunused-arguments -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99 -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1 > -D_

Re: leptonica update

2018-06-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.06.2018 5:22, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Yes, I was wrong: > > The CONFLICTS_BUILD in leptonica means it would pick up the wrong > "openjpeg.h" if openjpeg15 is installed. This seems to be porting bug that should be resolved by patching the source instead of just addition of CONFLICTS_BUI

Re: make package "*** Error code 1"

2018-06-07 Thread Eugene Grosbein
08.06.2018 8:12, duckmanjbr wrote: > do-install: > ${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/pkg > ${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/localrepo > ${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}/etc/inc/priv > ${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${DATADIR} > ${INSTALL_DATA} -m 0644 ${FILESDIR}${PREFIX}/pkg/localrepo.xml \ >

Re: make package "*** Error code 1"

2018-06-08 Thread Eugene Grosbein
08.06.2018 16:58, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> @${REINPLACE_CMD} -i '' -e "s|%%PKGVERSION%%|${PKGVERSION}|" \ >>> >>> .include >> >> Here is obvious bug: the line with REINPLACE_CMD has continuation backslash >> without any continuation text and without file name to process. Fix it. > > Actuall

Re: make package "*** Error code 1"

2018-06-08 Thread Eugene Grosbein
08.06.2018 20:12, duckmanjbr wrote: > 1st off, thanks everyone for helping me out! There was indeed a missing > filename and I believe I’ve remedied that. I’m moving along but now getting > a "missing property prefix” error. Am I missing a log file or something to > help trouble shoot these

Re: devel/qt5-core (qt5-core-5.9.4_2) (uninstall error)

2018-06-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
27.06.2018 9:46, Janos Dohanics wrote: > # ls -al /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Core* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1040 May 5 21:58 > /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Core.prl > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 May 5 21:58 > /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Core.so -> libQt5Core.so.5.9.4 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2018 5:52, Yuri wrote: > One software package has the custom license text that users need to > click-to-accept in order to install it. > > Does 'pkg' support such license? Can it show the user the license text and > ask the user to click "Agree" before installing the package? It does. Se

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2018 6:17, Yuri wrote: >> It does. See mail/dcc-dccd for example. > But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'. Yes. Meantime, you have several choices: 1) Mark the port NO_PACKAGE and/or no-pkg-mirror to force users use a port that 1a) builds software from source, or 1b)

Re: Passenger not working any more after Base System upgrade: can you reproduce?

2018-07-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 02.07.2018 03:19, José Pérez via freebsd-ports wrote: [skip] Have you actually read the log? > Further error details in log: > [ pid=57456, timestamp=1530359790 ] Process aborted! signo=SIGABRT(6), > reason=#65543, si_addr=0x0, randomSeed=1530359790 > [ pid=57456 ] Crash log dumped to > /va

Re: Passenger not working any more after Base System upgrade: can you reproduce?

2018-07-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 02.07.2018 03:19, José Pérez via freebsd-ports wrote: > Hi, > after a Base System upgrade Passenger fails on > startup with this error: > nginx: [alert] Unable to start the Phusion Passenger watchdog: it seems > to have been killed with signal SIGABRT during startup (-1: Unknown > error) > >

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2018 14:06, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'. >> >> Yes. Meantime, you have several choices: >> >> 1) Mark the port NO_PACKAGE and/or no-pkg-mirror to force users use a port >> that > > It is not no-pkg-mirror, in this case, it is no-aut

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.07.2018 18:01, Marko Cupać wrote: > What would be the benefit of users' clicks for owners of such software? > What would owners of such software lose if they didn't require clicks? > > What would be the benefit for pkg owners for investing time and effort > into supporting such feature? How wo

Re: building openjdk without alsa dependency

2018-07-30 Thread Eugene Grosbein
31.07.2018 7:29, blubee blubeeme пишет: > I would like to build openjdk7 without the asound lib, I already > removed ALSA from my kernel so the build fails but I am not writing > Java applications that needs sound. > > I made a few changes to just not build the ALSA parts and the port > builds pro

Re: Virtual Printer Port?

2018-07-31 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 29.07.2018 03:28, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > Hey all, > > This may be off topic, but does anyone know a port or configuration for > FreeBSD that can listen on a serial port and spit out a PDF? I have a > piece of hardware (a hospital-grade pulse oximeter) that's able to talk to > an *orig

Re: Delete a port

2018-08-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: >> ./rmport: svnlog: not found >> >> Anyone an idea what is wrong? > > Never used this script, but I guess you are hitting line 390: > > | $EDITOR svnlog > > Any chance $EDITOR i

Re: Delete a port

2018-08-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.08.2018 0:42, Eitan Adler wrote: >> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to vi? > > Why? Would't one want to respect the user's preference when it comes > to an editor? This preference is implicit when it comes to PATH. This is traditional overcautiousness against user's pos

Re: [freebsd 11.2] net-snmpd incomplete mac addresses

2018-10-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.10.2018 18:33, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Hello, > > freebsd 11.2/amd64 release > net-snmp-5.7.3_18 > > net-snmpd returns incomplete MAC addresses in IF-MIB::ifPhysAddress, > the first octet is always "0". > > $ snmpwalk -v 2c -c "xxx" localhost 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.6 > IF-MIB::ifPhysAddress.1

ssl=base

2018-11-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! As maintainer of the net/mpd5 port, I wonder why our ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk prevents building this port using FreeBSD 12 and base system libssl when libressl is installed? While building with ssl=base, the port itself does not include headers from ${LOCALBASE}/include and it does not include ${

Re: ssl=base

2018-11-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
25.11.2018 18:46, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> As maintainer of the net/mpd5 port, I wonder why our ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk >> prevents building this port using FreeBSD 12 and base system libssl >> when libressl is installed? >> >> While building with ssl=base, the port itself does not include headers >>

Re: ssl=base

2018-11-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
25.11.2018 18:57, Franco Fichtner wrote: >> Why can't you use LibreSSL port for some ports and base libssl for other >> ports? >> That is, net/mpd5 links with base system libfetch that depends on base >> libssl, >> so it is example of port that cannot be built with LibreSSL. > > FWIW, since 201

Re: packages and base jails

2018-11-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
27.11.2018 3:24, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm writing a book on jails and am looking for BCP. I'd like to > present either "This is the approved solution and should work" or > "these are the gotchas with any of these, choose your pain." > > Folks want base jails to include packages, b

Re: packages and base jails

2018-11-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
27.11.2018 6:42, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > But not /usr/local nor /usr/{src|obj}, if that matters. So each jail have its > own > set of packages or even ports if I choose to null-mount host's /usr/ports > readonly > to /usr/local/j/${JAILNAME}/basejail/usr/ports In f

Re: Deregister a port?

2019-02-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.02.2019 19:14, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > > Is there a way to deregister a port without touching port's files? > > The only way I see is build my own version without install, run > pkg delete end then make install on the source tree I'm managing > myself. > > This leaves me without the package

Re: pkg check erroneously reports missing lib

2019-02-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.02.2019 2:50, Xavier пишет: > This is mediatomb from ports, on FreeBSD 12-STABLE : > > > [root@numenor ~]# portupgrade -vf spidermonkey17 mediatomb > [...compile...compile...compile...] > > [root@numenor ~]# pkg check -Bd mediatomb > Checking mediatomb: 100% > mediatomb is missing a required

Re: Using LibreSSL with only one or a subset of all installed ports

2019-02-06 Thread Eugene Grosbein
07.02.2019 1:58, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I'm not saying that it can't be done, but you have to know all of the > linkages and be very sure that there are no conflicts. Sometimes libmap.conf(5) helps. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://l

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 8:02, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > Restarting the FreeCAD 0.17 discussion on a different tangent. > > As I mentioned before I am building (for now) outside of the ports > tree FreeCAD-git + Coin-hg + QT5 + med-4.0.0. I want to particularly > thank very much all the porti

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 8:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: >>> Transcribed output from the FreeCAD Testing Framework GUI test all: >>> >>> First run of TestApp.All: Run: 212 Failures: 1 Errors: 20 >>> >>> which isn't bad at all I suspect. However one of the failures is >>> >>> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 version GCC_4.8.0

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 8:58, Russell L. Carter wrote: > On 2/16/19 6:44 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 17.02.2019 8:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: >> >>>>> Transcribed output from the FreeCAD Testing Framework GUI test all: >>>>> >>>>> First run of Te

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 12:11, Steve Kargl wrot: >> # ldd /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libgfortran.so.5 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libgfortran.so.5: >> libquadmath.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libquadmath.so.0 >> (0x80146e000) >> libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x8016ad000) >> libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 13:19, Steve Kargl wrote: > For whatever reason, there are situations where the rpath > isn't set in the library. Read the rtld manpage. You're > hitting #5 in the list. Our package building system sets rpath for dependants of gcc8, so Fortran libraries (and others) do have rpath for

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 12:56, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:37:36PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 17.02.2019 12:11, Steve Kargl wrot: >> >>> >>> There is a problem with the order of libgcc_s.so.1 >>> in the cache created by ldconfig. rtld w

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 22:15, Diane Bruce wrote: > Basically all we need is a pre-loader script for interpreters > that run into this such as python. (I suspect there have to be other > interpreters that run into this.) Perhaps something like > python2_gfortran or the like, all it has to do is PRELOAD or mod

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 22:41, Diane Bruce wrote: >> Setting rpath for resulting binary should solve the problem. > > No no no no no. Not for an interpreter. The interpreter doesn't 'know' > you are about to load a binary module that needs libgcc_s and until > it loads something that uses gfortran it doesn't

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
17.02.2019 22:46, Diane Bruce wrote: >> We already have libmap.conf(5). It should be possible to work around the >> problem >> creating /usr/local/etc/libmap.d/python.conf with contents: >> >> [python2.7] >> libgcc_s.so.1 /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libgcc_s.so.1 >> >> [python3.4] >> libgcc_s.so.1 /usr/l

Re: loose dependency

2019-03-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
14.03.2019 11:40, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Koichiro Iwao wrote > in <20190314031726.aaspgwdcuithh...@icepick.vmeta.jp>: > > me> Hi, > me> > me> If a port have runtime dependency on bin/convert command of ImageMagick > me> but whichever ImageMagick{6,7}{,-nox11} are OK, how port Makefile should > m

Re: lang/go14 doesn't build without COMPAT11 in FREEBSD 12

2019-03-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
24.03.2019 1:38, Lucas Nali de Magalhães wrote: > I found a few bugs since I started rebuilding my system. > Most of them are related with the lack of handling of CPUTYPE=native > make.conf tunable. Use CPUTYPE?=native instead of CPUTYPE=native. ___ f

Re: rc script problems

2019-03-31 Thread Eugene Grosbein
01.04.2019 3:55, Jim Trigg wrote: > How do I write an rc script to preserve the pid of a child process? The > "port" I'm working with (technically a commercial package) has a startup > script that launches a java process. I had written a simple rc wrapper around > the script but have found it d

Re: irc/ngircd: typo in Makefile

2019-04-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
16.04.2019 2:09, Serpent7776 wrote: > Hello, > > I've just stumbled upon a possible typo in Makefile: > > DEBUG_CONFIGURE_EBABLE=¦¦ debug > > Shouldn't this be ENABLE instead of EBABLE? > Fixed in r499085, thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.or

OpenSSL engines directory path

2019-04-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! FreeBSD 12+ has OpenSSL version that supports loading additional "engines" (shared libraries). Default path for engines in FreeBSD is /usr/lib/engines currently. The path for security/openssl111 port (needed for FreeBSD 11) is ${LOCALBASE}/lib/engines-1.1 Please consider updating ports/Mk/U

Re: OpenSSL engines directory path

2019-04-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
24.04.2019 12:24, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > FreeBSD 12+ has OpenSSL version that supports loading additional "engines" > (shared libraries). > Default path for engines in FreeBSD is /usr/lib/engines currently. > The path for security/openssl111 por

openssl111/gnutls issue in the ftp/wget

2019-04-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! Is it a bug in the port ftp/wget or in the ports infrastructure (bsd.sanity.mk, ssl.mk) that ftp/wget fails to build for users of FreeBSD11 having openssl111 installed and DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl111 ? Error messages are: > /!\ wget-1.20.3: Makefile errors /!\ > > The following optio

Re: How to handle go dependencies

2019-06-22 Thread Eugene Grosbein
22.06.2019 16:58, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > I just prepare the gitlab-ce upgrade to version 12.0.0. > But I have some problem with a package that uses go to compile. > > The new version of devel/gitaly has changed the way the package is defined. > They removed now all files from th

Re: How to handle go dependencies

2019-07-07 Thread Eugene Grosbein
07.07.2019 5:10, Dmitri Goutnik via freebsd-ports wrote: > Which can be fixed by just copying the linux version (this probably needs to > be upstreamed): > > post-patch: > ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e "s|%%PREFIX%%|${PREFIX}|" > ${WRKSRC}/config.toml.example > ${MV} ${WRKSRC}/config.toml.exa

Re: fast aarch64 computer for creating a port?

2019-08-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 20.08.2019 14:44, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to create a port for Mongodb 4.2. To aarch64 and amd64. > Especially my RPI3 for aarch64 takes about 2 days to compile this. Does the > FreeBSD community have a fast aarch64 machine I could use to do test work? > Maybe some access t

Re: git submodule

2019-08-28 Thread Eugene Grosbein
29.08.2019 12:55, Cy Schubert wrote: > 2) Have the port download two tarballs from github. But, how, elegantly? Take a look at sysutils/fusefs-webdavfs for example. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

2019-10-07 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 07.10.2019 13:18, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate > IPV6 options by default everywhere". > > And now we are in 2019. IPv6 is more widely used than 2012. So I > wonder if

Re: Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL

2019-11-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
02.11.2019 20:48, @lbutlr wrote: > I have mariadb101 (client and server) installed, but when looking at what pkg > update will do, one of the things it will do is install MySQL. Is there > something I need to do to tell it to use MariaDB instead? > > Since I am here, it also wants to install a

Re: Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL

2019-11-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.11.2019 9:20, @lbutlr wrote: > On 02 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> I prefer third option. Sometimes it is handy to "pkg lock" packages you >> installed from ports buiklt with non-default options, too. > > If I could tell which pkg install is

Re: Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL

2019-11-12 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 03.11.2019 21:03, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 02 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>>> I prefer third option. Sometimes it is handy to "pkg lock" packages you >>>> installed from ports buiklt with non-default options, too. >>> >&

Re: net-snmp crash

2019-11-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
19.11.2019 4:22, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > Hi, > > I can reliably crash net-snmp with an snmpset. Worth a formal bug > report? > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD freebsdtest 12.0-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p10 GENERIC amd64 > > $ pkg info net-snmp > net-snmp-5.7.3_20,1 > Name : net-snmp >

Re: replacement of security/ipsec-tools

2020-01-09 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 03.01.2020 05:06, Michael Grimm wrote: > I am running ipsec-tools to implement a VPN tunnel (esp) between two hosts > for years now. > > But this statement on http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net makes me think about > an alternative: > The development of ipsec-tools has been ABANDONED.

Re: Build with "DEBUG" symbols

2020-01-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
16.01.2020 23:31, Carmel NY пишет: > Hypothetically, suppose I wanted to build my entire ports system with > "debug" symbols; would putting: > > WITH_DEBUG_PORTS=* > > in the "make.conf" file work? > > Asking for a friend. This should work for /etc/make.conf: WITH_DEBUG=yes ___

Re: cereal: fails to build on pure 64 bit systems

2020-01-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
25.01.2020 17:38, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > Hello, > > the newly introduced build for cereal fails to build on my system, > because I don't have 32 bit compatibility stuff enabled. > > The failure is caused by the default settings of enabling portability > testing. I have attached a patch

Re: cereal: fails to build on pure 64 bit systems

2020-01-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
25.01.2020 17:38, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > Hello, > > the newly introduced build for cereal fails to build on my system, > because I don't have 32 bit compatibility stuff enabled. > > The failure is caused by the default settings of enabling portability > testing. I have attached a patch

Re: Good CLI BitTorrent client?

2020-03-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.03.2020 21:12, @lbutlr wrote: > Sice people are talking about GUI botttorrent clients, are there decent ones > that are CLI? There is "transmission" acting like a daemon. You may manage it using CLI, or GUI, or web interface with any browser. ___

Re: users of xorg, in particular on FreeBSD 11.3

2020-03-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
21.03.2020 6:41, Niclas Zeising wrote: > [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility. > Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org . Thank you! ] > > In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in > particular keyboards

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
21.03.2020 4:30, @lbutlr wrote: > On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote: >> Adam Weinberger writes: >> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> requires

Re: openssl problem after 11 -> 12

2020-04-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
14.04.2020 16:58, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > I am at loss right now on how I could teach the FBSD-12 system to use the > older ciphers, it still works fine from 11. Easiest way would be untar'ing FreeBSD 11 base.txz into chroot area and copy your script there, too. Then use chroot to pkg insta

Re: Bind 9.16 port error still lingers

2020-05-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.05.2020 1:13, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 2020-05-02 19:29, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: >> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:53:18PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: >>> ## The Doctor via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org): > [snip] > >> //Use with the following in named.conf,

Re: Bind 9.16 port error still lingers

2020-05-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.05.2020 0:29, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > Then let's look at the file: [skip] Quickest way to unbreak your server: take default named.conf from the installation of version 9.16 and add your changes to it manually but keep default paths within lines "pid-file" and alike. That is, k

Re: accel-ppp

2020-06-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
19.06.2020 0:09, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > Would anyone like to help me port this application? > > Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. > > > It would make a good addition to the net ports. We already have net/mpd5 in ports for this task. __

Re: accel-ppp

2020-06-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
19.06.2020 0:35, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Which project is better maintained ? > > mpd5 had it's latest release in 2016, but commits until recently. > accel-ppp had it's latest release in August 2019 and also commits > until recently. mav@ and myself commit to upstream repo as needed, and there is a

Re: accel-ppp

2020-06-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
19.06.2020 0:34, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > Wonder if my mpd5.conf is configured properly? It depends on your goals as mpd5 is versatile. It has extensive logging and documentaion. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.f

Re: Makefile practice

2020-07-10 Thread Eugene Grosbein
11.07.2020 1:23, Harry Newton wrote: > I look after a port that has a poor Makefile [the one supplied with the > distribution, not the FreeBSD port Makefile]. The principal problem is > where it installs things. > > To get the port to do the right thing, I could either: heavily patch the > suppl

Re: Portmaster and less

2020-07-31 Thread Eugene Grosbein
01.08.2020 3:24, @lbutlr wrote: > When postmaster displays the package messages after installing, it calls > less, which forces you to hit 'q' to exit, and when you quit less, it clear > the buffer on the screen and returns you to the display of the compile > process. > > Is there anyway to ch

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
06.08.2020 6:02, Tatsuki Makino wrote : > Is there any command other than "rm -rf /usr/ports ; portsnap extract" > that can be easily repaired? svnlite revert -R /usr/ports ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
06.08.2020 13:23, Doug Hardie wrote: >> On 5 August 2020, at 21:30, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >> 06.08.2020 6:02, Tatsuki Makino wrote >> : >>> Is there any command other than "rm -rf /usr/ports ; portsnap extract" >>> that can be

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-07 Thread Eugene Grosbein
07.08.2020 18:10, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > Is there a similar seed file for subversion snapshot, that one can > download, extract, and "svn up" ? > > I was trying to "svn co" the ports tree, and it keeps dying in the > middle of checkout every few minutes. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/develop

Re: How to make 'named' rc script invokded earlier at boot time

2021-04-30 Thread Eugene Grosbein
30.04.2021 14:30, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > I installed dns/bind916 on my home server and configured it so it > worked as both authoritative and recursor. Then I added > 'nameserver 127.0.0.1' to /etc/resolv.conf and everything worked fine. > > But after updating OS from 12.2-RELEASE to 13.0-RELEAS

Re: looking for port origin for executable

2021-05-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.05.2021 0:28, Piotr Smyrak wrote: >> Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the >> executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to >> have done this one by mistake. > > When I hit a wall like this, this is my usual way to get around without > any additi

Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x

2021-05-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
06.05.2021 10:49, Dima Panov wrote: > Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl > libraries :( > At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built > with “port openss” and consumers still get a “base openssl”. > DEFAULT_VERSION here is set to a

Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available?

2014-09-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
atures resulted in MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump. And please, delay bumping of MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION until packages of pkg itself are available from the repo. Eugene Grosbein ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Pass options to dependency

2017-06-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
completely unneded for a port that just needs to use BUILD_DEPENDS=ragel:devel/ragel The reason is that bsd.options.mk includes PORT_OPTIONS+= DOCS unless user option NOPORTDOCS is set. Is it possible to specify something like OPTIONS_EXCLUDE=DOCS for BUILD_DEPENDS entity? Eugen

Re: Pass options to dependency

2017-06-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.06.2017 18:51, Matthew Seaman пишет: > On 05/06/2017 10:56, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> How can a port (its Makefile) pass a build option to BUILD_DEPENDS? >> For example, devel/ragel has: >> >> DOCS_USE= TEX=latex:build >> DOCS_BUILD_DEPENDS=

Re: How to stop ports recompiling gcc, llvm, etc.?

2017-06-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
13.06.2017 22:25, Rastko P пишет: > I have some experience with FreeBSD. I don't mind building ports. You > know sometimes it's necessary (most FreeBSD software is ported, and > needs to be configured) > > > But I cannot find in the documentation how to prevent a port > re-compiling different ver

Re: Best practice to tail a log and start it as service using rc.d scripts

2017-07-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2017 23:20, Matthias Fechner пишет: > Dear all, > > I just in the process to test mailtrain (https://mailtrain.org/) and if > it is working I would like to create a port for FreeBSD. > > That mailtrain can handle bounce message with postfix together it is > necessary to tail the postfix log

Re: Best practice to tail a log and start it as service using rc.d scripts

2017-07-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
05.07.2017 1:02, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 03.07.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Eugene Grosbein: >> For logs written using standard syslog service, there is much >> effective way. >> 1. The syslogd daemon can run a subprocess and duplicate log stream to its >> standard input

Re: Writing a port make deinstall

2017-07-11 Thread Eugene Grosbein
12.07.2017 9:38, blubee blubeeme wrote: > How do I properly write this Makefile so deinstall works as expected? Just add these files to pkg-plist and they are removed automatically. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: getbdf-1.02

2017-07-24 Thread Eugene Grosbein
25.07.2017 10:35, jb wrote: > hi BSD, > > Where the fuck is this thing ? I am so sick of Free ! Open Source ! > "packages" that don't have the source. > > I dont want ports, I don't want packages, I don't want apt yumget or any > other hand-holding crap, suckmydick-letmeinstallthis, I want the

Re: Help needed by first-timer porter

2017-08-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.08.2017 12:43, Manish Jain пишет: > The question is, at this stage, where do I get the default > stage-definitions file from. If I specify stage-definitions among the > package's listing, it will go into one of the standard directories, > which is not what I want. Please re-read Porter's Ha

Re: Help needed by first-timer porter

2017-08-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.08.2017 20:34, Manish Jain wrote: > There is a hiccup, which I am fairly certain a few others would have > experienced too. So I look to resolve the situation of MASTER_SITES, > which it appears is mandatory. It is not. If your port has few little source files, you can create files/ subdire

Re: standard locations for port files

2017-08-31 Thread Eugene Grosbein
31.08.2017 22:07, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd. > > Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file. > > Would it be in > /usr/local/etc/product/product.log > /usr/local/etc/product/product.pid > > or > > /var/log/product.log > /var/r

Re: Kibana53 - Not suitable node version available?

2017-09-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 13.09.2017 16:29, Mark Clarke wrote: > Hi all, > > I posted a comment on a bug report regarding kibana53 failure to start > by default on 11.0 and 11.1. I installed Kibana53 with pkg. From the bug > report it looks like node 8.2 or higher is required. The maintainer > asked me to post here i

Re: FireFox memory usage

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 15.09.2017 18:35, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'm on 10.3/amd64 with firefox-esr 52.3.0. > > Since a few days my 4GiB desktop is crawling due to swap usage and > looking at top, I see FireFox using almost 7GiB of RAM (SIZE column), > 2.5 of which are "RES". > > I don't think this i

Re: slrn from ports segfaults when running

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 15.09.2017 20:00, tech-lists wrote: > Hello ports@ > > slrn as compiled from ports will segfault after a short time when > reading a newsgroup. The fix is to deinstall the port, grab the source > via git from git://git.jedsoft.org/git/slrn.git and compile it > yourself and install. > > If some

Re: FireFox memory usage

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 15.09.2017 20:24, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> This depends heavily on your set of addons, though. > > I just have AdBlockPlus and DownThemAll (which I hadn't used today, though). Try to run it for some time with all addons disabled and if this helps, enable addons one-by-one restarting FF full

Re: slrn from ports segfaults when running

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 15.09.2017 20:57, tech-lists wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:07:54PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> First, try to rebuild port using "make WITH_DEBUG=yes" and run non-stripped >> binary >>from stage/ subdirectory of port building ares. Then get corefi

Re: slrn from ports segfaults when running

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
15.09.2017 21:56, tech-lists пишет: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 09:12:57PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> On 15.09.2017 20:57, tech-lists wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:07:54PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> >>>> First, try to rebuild port using

Re: slrn from ports segfaults when running

2017-09-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:24:18AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > slrn freezes when the process is attached, so ran bt from gdb: No, just use "gdb /path//to/slrn /path/to/corefile" It should report segmentation fault and you could obtain backtrace. ___ free

Re: slrn from ports segfaults when running

2017-09-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
16.09.2017 8:46, tech-lists wrote: > # gdb ./slrn ./slrn.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions.

Re: EXTRA_PATCHES considered harmful?

2017-09-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
24.09.2017 4:39, Julian Elischer wrote: > currently if you set EXTRA_PATCHES and the port you are making decides to > build a second port as a dependency, EXTRA_PATCHES is passed to the second > port which them obiously fails to patch it. > > e.g. cd /usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools-nox11; Ma

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

2017-10-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> Why compile ports directly on a box that is so hardware constrained that it > will take multiple hours to do, when a "pkg update; pkg upgrade" takes only > a few minutes? I tried really hard to run small virtual machine (1GB RAM, 25G disk) hosted at Hetzner without using ports and can say it's

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

2017-10-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 05.10.2017 04:22, Steve Kargl wrote: > I did not state that the "environment is constrained by poudriere". > The environment is contrained due to resource limits. If you > only have 1 Gb of memory and 5-10 GB diskspace, then using poudriere > with zfs and jails is a nonstarter. Yes, I'm aware

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

2017-10-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 05.10.2017 08:14, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Poudriere wants to be everything to everybody First poudriere will have to learn how to run without noticeable overhead compared to "just build from ports" before it could became "everything to everybody" and it needs to became part of base system fo

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 01.11.2017 18:53, Baho Utot wrote: >> My personal suggestion is to use noscript, most sites work quite fine >> without javascript and even more sites work fine by allowing only a few >> origins, but blocking dozens of third party scripts. +1 > Noscript results in sites not working, ever try y

  1   2   >