06.05.2021 10:49, Dima Panov wrote: > Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl > libraries :( > At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built > with “port openss” and consumers still get a “base openssl”. > DEFAULT_VERSION here is set to avoid a such situation — the whole ports > collection should be linked with ONE ssl/crypto library.
I disagree. There is no reason for "leaf" ports to depend on ports version of openssl and this is impossible in come cases. For example, net/mpd5 port that links with base libfetch that links with base openssl. So, net/mpd5 must NOT be linked with ports openssl and frankly, it needs not. Global inflexible knob for whole ports tree is bad thing. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
