On 11/18/2011 06:05, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> On 18/11/2011 15:48, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> The ports, 10-current, stable/8 and stable/7 were all updated yesterday
>>> shortly after ISC publicly released the
On 11/21/2011 15:17, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Lets suppose you want the gtk2 version of lazarus, and lets further
> suppose that the two slave ports discussed previously have been created.
>
> You would write dependency lines in the port Makefile eg. like this:
>
> BUILD_DEPENDS = lazarus:${
On 11/22/2011 6:18 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> I have tried various ways to build a query that includes "responsible IS
> NULL"
You almost certainly want responsible=freebsd-ports-bugs. Unassigned is
a relative term. :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&responsible=freeb
On 11/27/2011 5:01 AM, Jerry wrote:
> Personally, "portmaster"
> always seems to get my ass in a sling when I have attempted to use it
> so I leave it alone. Obviously, YMMV.
As always, if you run into bugs or problems with portmaster I'm happy to
accept bug reports about it.
--
On 12/09/2011 09:06, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> There is a problem building various ports caused by the FreeBSD
> major version number going from 9 to 10 (specifically, from single
> to double digits).
> My morning brain has been unable to find this in the PR
> database; would some kind so
On 12/09/2011 12:20, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Doug Barton writes:
>
>> > There is a problem building various ports caused by the FreeBSD
>> > major version number going from 9 to 10 (specifically, from single
>> > to double digits).
>> > My morn
On 12/09/2011 13:18, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:09:09AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 02/12/2011 21:55 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andriy Gapon wrot
I receive PDF documents with URLs that I need to click, and so I would
like to get that working in acroread8. I symlink'ed firefox into
/compat/linux/usr/local/bin, and set the preferences in acroread
accordingly. That got me from a "firefox not found" error to this,
printed out in the terminal:
l
On 12/11/2011 23:24, Micheas Herman wrote:
> Not a direct solution, but I have found the gnome pdf reader evince
Thanks, too gnome'y. :)
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolution
On 12/09/2011 16:14, Doug Barton wrote:
> I receive PDF documents with URLs that I need to click, and so I would
> like to get that working in acroread8. I symlink'ed firefox into
> /compat/linux/usr/local/bin, and set the preferences in acroread
> accordingly. That got me fr
On 12/10/2011 06:35, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Doug Barton writes:
>
>> >> Read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
>> >
>> > If you mean 20110928 - that identifies the problem, and
>> > provides workarounds, but does not name the pr.
>>
>>
On 12/06/2011 05:45, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:29:03 -0600
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600
>>> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>>
>>>
Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel
running as a FreeBSD
On 12/12/2011 21:52, Jason Helfman wrote:
> epdfview is like evince, but doesn't use all of the gnome libs.
This is awesome, thanks!
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.co
On 12/20/2011 04:03, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:18:22PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>> Doug Barton writes:
>>
>>> > epdfview is like evince, but doesn't use all of the gnome libs.
>>>
>>> This is awesome, thanks
On 12/22/2011 16:32, Christer Edwards wrote:
> I must have horrible luck or something, but I've put together rc
> scripts and they don't work. This port sure is giving me a hard time!
>
> Here is a link to the updated archive with the .sample suggestions
> applied as well as the rc scripts. Can a
On 12/22/2011 17:34, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> There are some style problems and one real bug that are repeated for all
>> 3 scripts. I attached a fixed version of one of them, hopefully that
>> will help you see wha
On 12/22/2011 18:01, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 12/22/11 8:34 PM, Christer Edwards wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> There are some style problems and one real bug that are repeated for all
>>> 3 scripts. I attached a fixed version of
On 12/22/2011 18:28, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Try doing s/-/_/ for all the $name variables. I think that's what's
>> causing your problem.
>
> I did a little more testing (and I added the Makefile and .in fil
On 12/22/2011 23:05, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> You need to pay attention to what Greg told you, and read the Handbook
>> page that I sent. :)
>
> OK. I give. I've read that Handbook page a number of times and noth
On 12/22/2011 23:21, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Did you read the pre-commit checklist? Particularly item 7?
>
> "If the script uses an interpreted language like perl, python, or
> ruby, make certain that com
On 12/22/2011 23:40, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> So now do 'ps axww | grep salt' and confirm that it's really running
>> with python2.7, as opposed to something different.
>
> Indeed it is running with py
On 12/22/2011 23:47, Christer Edwards wrote:
> The pid file does not seem to get created.
Ok, so fix it. :) Setting 'pidfile' in the rc.d script is only useful
if the service creates a pid file. It's not magic.
Given that the thing seems to create a lot of instances of itself, and
one pid may n
On 12/21/2011 01:13, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 07:13:41PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 04:03, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:18:22PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Doug Barton writes:
>>>
Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list?
--
You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
__
On 01/04/2012 06:00, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list?
>
> I neither have the infrastructure nor the time to
> setup and maintain my own list so I created one on
> Google Groups:
>
>
I do package build systems that support a variety of types of end
systems. (Nearly) all of them use php in some form or another, but a
substantial portion of them don't have web servers, and therefore don't
need the cgi, apache module, or the apache dependency that comes with them.
What would make
On 01/05/2012 21:45, John Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the
>> command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate
>> ports. Is this feasible?
>
On 01/08/2012 04:59, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> The porters handbook describes a way to handle config files:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/plist-config.html
>
> It is recommended to do it this way for keeping changed files after
> deinstallation on the sy
On 01/09/2012 12:08, alexus wrote:
> so maybe there is package to make existing php5 package that would
> work w/ apache and not just fastcgi
There is not a package with that option enabled. You will need to build
/usr/ports/lang/php5 and run 'make config' to enable it.
Hope this helps,
Doug
-
On 1/11/2012 2:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> my problem occurs with lang/gcc (gcc 4.6) as a compiler.
That's not an officially supported configuration. If stuff breaks for
you when using a !base compiler your fastest course of action for
getting a fix is to do it yourself. :)
Doug
--
Y
On 1/11/2012 10:41 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> Instead of hacking up zoneminder's rc script with further patches like
> pulling out the real mysql server, database, username and password
> perhaps we should see if we can get the mysql maintainer(s) to fix the
> mysql rc script so it doesn't exit until
On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-)
>>
>> Yes
>
> Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there some sort of
> target timeline?
>
> Back in 2010 when the framework was introduced, my genera
On 01/17/2012 14:35, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Anything can go wrong, but it is (IMO) quite easy to state the intention of
> the FreeBSD Project in this case.
You're making the very common mistake of assuming that the law has
anything to do with reality. It doesn't. The fact that we're making
cla
On 01/18/2012 23:07, vermaden wrote:
> Lets talk about Ports maintainers for a while, ftp/vsftpd maintainer
> for example, one of the options of this port is to provide a RC script
> so one will be able to start this FTP server with /usr/local/etc/rc.d
> script, but ... ITS NOT ENABLED BY DEFAULT,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
not sure where this thread started as searching my mail archives yielded
nothing apart from this excerpt.
-hackers.
If this is an attack on FreeBSD
It's not.
as the title suggests;
It doesn't. In any case I forgot to change the subject line, mea c
On 01/18/2012 17:31, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> in manually trying to build an index for a tinderbox/binary/portmaster
> distribution
I highly recommend looking at ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for this
purpose. After the initial set up incremental changes take seconds,
instead of 30+ minutes.
Other ports are up to date, but I'm getting this:
===> Configuring for nspluginwrapper-1.4.4
unknown floating point format
Let me know how much more detail is useful.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of kno
I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
msgpack update in 0.9.5.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetS
On 01/20/2012 04:53, Chris Rees wrote:
> Occasionally someone runs an exp- for sparc64 (lol) etc.
... which given the overwhelming lack of users for this platform is
almost certainly a waste of resources.
> They use TRYBROKEN to test packages marked BROKEN, but ONLY_FOR_ARCHS sets
> IGNORE.
>
>
On 01/20/2012 05:23, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> how about ia64?
The benefit of ONLY_FOR_ARCHS is that it eliminates exactly this kind of
guesswork. :)
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
On 01/20/2012 07:09, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
>> msgpack update in 0.9.5.
>
> I am hoping to get the port updated today, yes. Thanks for the
&g
On 01/19/2012 07:39, Herby Vojčík wrote:
> The couchdb_prestart function gets run (I put echos in there), but its
> couchdb_flags is not taken into account.
The proper solution here is almost certainly to change couchdb_flags to
commands_args in couchdb_prestart().
> I had to make this change:
Can you test the fix that I proposed and let us know if it works?
Thanks,
Doug
On 01/21/2012 01:30 AM, Herby Vojčík wrote:
> Whatever, just fix it, please.
>
> Thanks, Herby
>
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 01/19/2012 07:39, Herby Vojčík wrote:
>>
>>> The c
On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports
> ===>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.2008 to
> gcc-4.4.7.20120117
> lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.2008
>
> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar o
On 01/24/2012 13:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an
> unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option?
No, usually it works with the package name as the second argument (or
even a glob pattern as long as it resolves to a unique packa
On the plus side, we have dozens of production FreeBSD VM's running on a
mid-size vSphere 4 development.
On the minus side this is down significantly from this time last year.
We are migrating to FreeBSD-on-KVM as fast as we can because VMware's
support for FreeBSD is as others have described (i.e
I'm seeing a weird "issue" with these 2 ports. I have the "check for
mismatched checksums" enabled for periodic, which is how I first noticed
this problem. Short version, whichever one I update last corrupts the
files of the other one.
Other than the mismatched checksums I haven't noticed any actu
On 01/26/2012 00:40, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton ha scritto:
>> Other than the mismatched checksums I haven't noticed any actual
>> problems, so this is more of an "Is this a problem?" question.
>
> AFAIK all ports should switch to giflib and libungif shou
Howdy,
This section:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html
is out of date, as the very first bit mentions a bunch of old apache
stuff. I'm happy to help update it if someone can say authoritatively
what should be there.
I'm also curious about the advice
On 02/06/2012 13:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 02/06/12 15:26, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I'm also curious about the advice to install stuff into
>>> /usr/local/www/appname. I vaguely remember that this was deprecated but
>>> it seems
On 02/07/2012 13:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
>>
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is un
On 02/07/2012 02:49, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I would like to ask you to review and test the port in this PR:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164843
Using the latest shar on up to date 8-stable i386 it seems to run fine.
FWIW I'm using the port with all of the OPTIONS UNchecked.
A co
On 02/07/2012 17:13, Svyatoslav Lempert wrote:
> 2012/2/7 :
>> The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
>> for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before
>> that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
>> the ports will be deleted
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
> other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion
> in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
> this?
Take a look at editors/xxe
On 02/07/2012 17:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
>>> other than putting a comment in the main port "# m
On 02/07/2012 17:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
>>> other than putting a comment in the main por
On 02/07/2012 18:07, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/12 8:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> ok, but I said these are two maintainers,
>> Before I maintained either they were both maintained by 2 different
>> people. :)
>> Well yeah, but so w
On 02/07/2012 14:09, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-02-06 01:57, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> This section:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html
>>
>> is out of date, as the very first bit mentions a bunch of
On 02/07/2012 18:30, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/12 9:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> No. Please actually LOOK CAREFULLY at the example I gave you. It does
>> the right thing.
>>
> you mean talk to lev (maintainer of ../subversion16) and ask for a
&
Following up to my previous post about "Why isn't WWWDIR_REL in the
default PLIST_SUB I broke open bsd.port.mk and found this:
PLIST_SUB+= DOCSDIR="${DOCSDIR_REL}" \
EXAMPLESDIR="${EXAMPLESDIR_REL}" \
DATADIR="${DATADIR_REL}" \
WWWDIR="${WWWDIR_R
On 02/08/2012 02:12, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>> portname: graphics/vrml2pov
>> description:Convert VRML files to POVRay source
>> maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
>> status: BROKEN
>> deprecated because: unfetchable
>
> This s
On 02/06/2012 04:43, Daniel Stolpe wrote:
> Does this mean I can stop using 10.0-current on my Lenovo X121e? ;-)
No. :)
We need more people running HEAD on their day-to-day systems, not less.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT exper
On 02/08/2012 07:36, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> So this leads me to many questions, the first and most obvious of which
>> is, what the heck good is WWWDIR_REL in the first place?
>
> I don't follow you: in what sense WWWDIR_REL is different from, e.g.,
&g
Please don't cross-post to -questions. Please follow up on -ports.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
__
On 02/09/2012 21:20, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I maintain a port that accesses the release distribution files. Now with
> 9.0 having a different path /i386/i386 and the files being compressed
> first with tar and then again with xz I need to change the port to
> access the new layout and file format.
>
> I w
On 02/10/2012 14:45, Greg Larkin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm in the midst of building a system to use Tinderbox and FreeBSD jails
> to keep them up to date as new port updates are committed to the tree.
>
> I created some meta-ports in /usr/ports/local/misc to record
> dependencies and be able to
On 02/08/2012 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Following up to my previous post about "Why isn't WWWDIR_REL in the
>> default PLIST_SUB I broke open bsd.port.mk and found this:
>>
>> P
On 02/10/2012 16:17, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:13:32PM -0800, Doug Barton thus spake:
>> On 02/08/2012 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Following up to my previous post about "Why i
On 02/10/2012 17:57, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
Clearly I'm missing something then, because I don't see how they
accomplish anything useful. Perhaps you can enlighten me? There is
nothing in the CVS log that even mentions them, never mind why they were
added (bad portm
On 02/14/2012 11:23, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone add an entry in ports/UPDATING for the latest update of
> devel/pcre (8.30) ?
>
> All ports that depend on it have to be rebuilt (you have to rebuild
> all the box...).
I added a note that suggests using the -w option for po
So apparently we have a python vulnerability according to
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/b4f8be9e-56b2-11e1-9fb7-003067b2972c.html,
but I'm not seeing an upgrade to address it yet. Any idea when that will
happen?
Thanks,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
On 02/14/2012 14:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/02/2012 22:17, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> I added a note that suggests using the -w option for portmaster which
>> preserves the shared libs until a better solution is found. I guessed on
>> the knob for portupgrade, if
On 02/14/2012 17:08, Don Lewis wrote:
> The rc.d script installed by the smartmontools port is still trying to
> use set_rcvar. The problem is that the copy of the script under the
> files directory has been updated, but the script that the port actually
> installs is work/smartd.freebsd.initd.in,
On 02/14/2012 22:52, poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Do you interested in mail/mimedefang? It also has set_rcvar in
> its rc.d script.
Fixed, thanks.
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowled
On 02/15/2012 06:04, Marco Steinbach wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is there a way for telling portmaster to not upgrade already installed
> dependencies, besides explicitly excluding these with '-x' or using
> '+IGNOREME' ?
Someone already mentioned -i.
> In other words: Is there a flag, or a combinat
On 02/15/2012 14:27, George Liaskos wrote:
> Thank you for the great work, pkg-updating.1 should be added in the MAN1
> because pkg is currently falling under tinderbox.
Shouldn't stuff like updating packages be in sbin & man section 8?
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fi
On 02/15/2012 15:23, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> especially if you consider packages/ports to be external to the FreeBSD
> operating system itself.
Good thing the ports are an integral part of the operating SYSTEM. :)
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Bread
On 02/17/2012 02:14, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Speaking about FreeBSD ports' current way of recording dependencies and
> overzealous portrevision bumping.
We're way to aggressive about recording grandchild dependencies.
Repeated calls for this to be addressed have been ignored.
Meanwhile you can put
On 02/17/2012 15:41, Mikhail T. wrote:
> If, in fact, the current port does not care, which version of libfoo is
> uses -- and most software does not -- then declaring an explicit V is
> wrong: it /gratuitously/ tightens the build-time requirements. Unless a
> particular version is, indeed, require
On 02/18/2012 04:08, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Many thanks for the update of WindowMaker. I really appreciate it! As
> far as I was able to test until now it works greats.
>
> The only problem I run into is, that it is not possible to save the
> workspaces (sessions) any more. With prior versions I
On 02/18/2012 04:56, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
> Should the rc script create these directories so that things "work out of the
> box"
The answer to this question is always yes.
> or should it not, as to not create unneeded directories during upgrades?
A few spurious empty directories is a tiny
On 02/17/2012 10:22, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:35:05PM +, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> Public flogging seems to be more enjoyable than a private email to the
>> developer, the maintainer, and a committer.
>
> I know we are all a little frustrated with some of the local co
I've been using 8-stable the last several weeks in preparation for the
new release and decided to give PAE a try for the first time. I rebuilt
my kernel with that option, and it booted fine. Then I rebuilt the
nvidia module and as soon as I kldload'ed it, boom!
panic: pmap_mapdev: Couldn't alloc k
On 02/18/2012 19:03, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 03:59:37PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Where I think reasonable minds can differ are (appropriate) responses of
>> the form, "This was not done properly, here is how it can/should be done
>> (better).&quo
On 02/18/2012 22:09, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 06:19:18PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I've been using 8-stable the last several weeks in preparation for the
>> new release and decided to give PAE a try for the first time. I rebuilt
>> my kerne
Howdy,
I'm having problems building xfe on recent 8-stable i386:
cc -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.
-I.. -I../intl -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/i
On 02/21/2012 02:43, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> I can't - I don't know why npviewer.bin is killed by SIGTERM immediatelly
> when it socketcall to [::1]:6010 in Linuxulator and why it works
> normally when it socketcall to 127.0.0.1:6010. I remember when I had
> FF 7, Flash works with ::1 first, but L
Howdy,
I had the previous version of virtualbox working just fine on my
up-to-date 8-stable i386 system, and upgraded to 4.1.8 today. When I
attempt to load vboxdrv it instantly panics my system:
panic: vm_object_deallocate: object deallocated too many times: 4
cpuid = 1
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_
The port is currently tagged:
BROKEN= does not configure
and I don't see any PRs for it. Do you have plans to look at it? Do you
need any help?
Thanks,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge i
On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding file
> in the port and re-test the port?
Good news, the kernel didn't panic. Bad news:
supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, rc=
On 02/22/2012 01:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding
>>> file
>>> in the port and re-test t
On 02/22/2012 01:41, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> The 4.0.16 version is still available as emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy
I know, that, but kind of beside the point, right?
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowle
On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
Same result, different memory address:
supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8
vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, rc=-8
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vboxdrv, 0xc66e8410, 0) erro
On 02/22/2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/02/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder.
>>
>> Same result, different memory address:
>>
>> s
Rainer,
I'm cc'ing the wmaker-dev list, please follow up there rather than
freebsd-ports till we get this resolved.
On 02/22/2012 10:47, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> it seems I found a workaround for getting the session restored after
> restarting windowmaker.
I took a look at this and got some very
On 02/21/2012 19:14, Doug Barton wrote:
> The port is currently tagged:
>
> BROKEN= does not configure
>
> and I don't see any PRs for it. Do you have plans to look at it? Do you
> need any help?
I tried removing the BROKEN line and this port worked just
On 02/24/2012 09:56, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like 'portmaster -a' was not picking
> up mksh update since mksh-r40 here, it
> piqued my curiosity when pkg_version
> reported I had newer mksh installed than
> available in ports tree, but the version I had
> installed was ripe old
On 02/24/2012 06:18, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> In general I agree with your reasoning. The feature I'm talking about has
> been approved and will be in the next version (this happened almost half a
> year ago). Unfortunately Ice has a slow release cycle, as it is dual licensed
> (GPLv2+commercial)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/25/2012 11:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 25/02/2012 18:21, Royce Williams wrote:
>> To ease the transition, does anyone know of a Rosetta Stone
>> table, or "portmaster for native speakers of portupgrade"?
>
> It's not too hard to switch. Re
On 02/25/2012 16:33, Royce Williams wrote:
> I really did mean that I was looking for a Rosetta Stone
Yes, I know what a Rosetta Stone is, so I understood what you were
asking for. But there are (at least) 3 problems with that approach:
1. I never used portupgrade, so I couldn't answer those ques
601 - 700 of 1534 matches
Mail list logo
