p in /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.0h/crypto.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.0h.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssl.
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/local/www/db/text/2012/cvs-ports/20120226.cvs-ports
Thanks,
Bryan Drewery
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=719045+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2012/cvs-ports/20120226.cvs-ports>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
has many bugs against it:
I am going to attempt to take over the upstream and maintainership. I
use it quite a bit and don't want to see it go away.
Thanks,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozill
ccurate. Can you open an issue
> about this problem?
>
> regards, Bapt
Anton,
I've logged this here: https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues/199
I'm working on a usage/manpage update for it.
Thanks,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/17/2012 12:50 AM, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
> Should libssl.so.7 have been retained somehow?
>
> I upgraded using portmaster, it that provides any clues as to why it was
> or wasn't.
>
Using -w with portmaster will retain the old file in
/usr/loca
i,
Sorry, will get this fixed.
Thanks,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPkBOoAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5/WMP/2Z9EN/yzhEHpuJqU9x9ijP1
dlT7oXxijRlUfBvIwCjMjvDlRfMDMMEmIkVRUtGDIl98p01Rp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/19/2012 01:14 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks like SSL suppot needs to be compiled into the base system
> to fetch the portupgrade source?! At least my base system is
> without SSL support and it does not fetch...
Hi,
There's a pa
On 04/20/2012 02:14 PM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Where is my mistake?
>
>
> => pkgtools-2.4.9.3.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
> => Attempting to fetch
> http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/portupgrade/pkgtools/2.4.9.3/pkgtools-2.4.9.3.tar.bz2
>
> fetch:
> http://hea
it best to include ports@.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPnLSwAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5iXUQALThHzZUfNmrR6P9Ze46d2Vm
fwhKD3A20SeVz/HfuwHlkdGZcWWdCvPhhNmuTDb8z+quYf2UX2dmVp
from git without a known checksum. Not only
was this a security risk [2], it is causing a problem for
restructuring the file layout / plist for the next release[s].
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
[1] http://pkgtools.github.com
[2] http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/b428e6b3-926c-11e1-8d7b-003067b2972c.html
-
not properly
committed.
Will submit a new patch.
Change your distinfo to:
SHA256 (pkgtools-pkgtools-0449e52.tar.gz) =
2256a41090e448359fb59a766aa4dd4706d89322ebce1d965e23170d7d7ef568
SIZE (pkgtools-pkgtools-0449e52.tar.gz) = 99819
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
ools-pkgtools-0449e52.tar.gz
>>
>>>
> )etch: invalid size ( 99819 => Couldn't fetch it - please try to
>>> retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and
>>> try again. *** Error code 1
> I am having the same problem.
>
>
&g
her out, before I fix it, please let me know.
>
> The boxes are 7.4/8.2 i386/amd64 with different versions of ruby and bdb
> backend.
>
> Maybe some port has some invalid value and I might just exclude it as a
> temporary fix... but which one is it?
>
> bye & Thanks
&
n 7.4
i386, 8.3 i386, 9.0 amd64. All work.
It just fails for me when building in a jail.
I removed all of my custom make.conf changes and rebuilt all
dependencies as well.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
On 5/6/2012 9:57 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Does anyone else get this failure when building print/freetyp2?
>
> gnome-libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from
> `/wrkdirs/usr/ports/print/freetype2/work/freetype-2.4.9/objs/.libs/libfreetype.so.9'
>
&g
e & Thanks
> av.
av,
Thank you for your report and looking into this further. I have fixed
this upstream for the next release - 2.4.9.6.
Here's a patch in the meantime:
https://github.com/pkgtools/pkgtools/commit/6c2d240e917cc14591086f59db9c8c39e9771397.diff
Thank you,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/12/2012 1:13 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:55:13PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
>> > On 05/11/12 21:54, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>> > > There is no A record @8.8.8.8 or @8.8.4.4 or at the root servers.
>> >
>> > There's not supposed to be an A record. Portsnap
any minutes.
Yeah I'm seeing that too.
Will look into it and get an updated snapshot out soon.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
-bsdcan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscrib
> On 5/12/2012 9:44 AM, Michael C Voorhis wrote:
>>
>> This morning's new portupgrade-devel *appears* to define WITH_PKGNG in
>> spite of its not being in /etc/make.conf. Many portupgrades this
>> morning are hanging at the pkgdb update, with the process list showing:
>>
>> root 32920 0.0
t yesterday.
The latest portupgrade-devel port has this issue fixed.
You may want to just manually make deinstall reinstall for it.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
update the ports and handbook.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 05/14/2012 06:25 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 14, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
>> large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
>> destroying any user-supplied depend
changes to make it possible for
> further additions to make.conf is a bad idea.
>
> b.
Alright sounds good. I'll drop the endeavor and stick to bsd.local.mk.
Thanks!
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 5/24/2012 6:47 AM, Alexander V. Ribchansky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> May be /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere + /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg is
> what you really need?
Yes you can run a 32bit jail on a 64bit machine.
Poudriere works really well for building packages like this.
--
Re
mp;getpatch=1
patch < patch-openssh-hpn-mirror.txt
Currently there is no maintainer of security/openssh-portable, but there
are some patches to upgrade to 5.9/6.0 in the works.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rted
ports.
You can see this in bsd.options.mk
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nstead of default DBM
BDB1_DESC= Use Berkeley DB 1
BDB4_DESC= Use Berkeley DB >=2
Here DB_OVERRIDE must be selected to select either of BDB4 or BDB1.
This gives you 0 or 1 on the BDB4/BDB1.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
scripts on 1.9.3 on FreeBSD 7.4, I am not seeing the
issue any longer.
These also suggest it is fixed in (1.9.2+) and 7.2+:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7147470/ruby-1-9-2-freebsd
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2097
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6/4/2012 8:30 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/2012 1:44 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new options framework is now in the port for a week, most of the problems
>> directly concerning the framework seems to have been addressed.
>
On 6/8/2012 8:14 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Another common question is how to check if an option is not set. We all
>> try !${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO} to find it does not work.
>
> $ cat Makefile
> all:
> .if ${LIST:MFOO}
>
sn't mean you have to use it.
If it makes sense to override the DESC for your port, do that too.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6/9/2012 3:38 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Where is all this about the new options framework documented?
There's a "What users need to know" section here:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
On 6/10/2012 4:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
> Where/when would this trigger?
This could block the upgrade as soon as they try to build it if they
already have the ini and do not have a sample file.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
On 6/10/2012 4:32 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/11/2012 4:30, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 6/10/2012 4:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
>>> Where/when would this trigger?
>>
>> This could block the upgrade as soon as they try to build it if they
>> already have t
the same thing. (Not
> done because I'm hoping someone better at make(1) will have cleaner
> methods.)
>
> There's a cosmetic problem. The last description line at the bottom of
> the screen remains after dialog exits. I have not found a way to clear
> it in dialog.
>
Cool idea.
FYI --item-help is not supported on 8.3 and earlier so a OSVERSION check
is probably needed.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
that this is a popular theme in bsd.port.mk, but I am not sure why it is
> needed and if my workaround is actually correct.
>
> Hope that this is useful.
>
Andriy,
Thank you for identifying the cause of this. Some others have reported
it as well but I have been unable to recreate.
I
+ (cd $$dir; ${MAKE} config-recursive); \
> done
> .endif # config-recursive
The patch seems right and makes sense to me. Properly runs
config-conditional on every port first, then recurses into it, reading
its dependencies as they change.
Filing a PR is best so this doesn't get lost.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
including fix-up all the dependent ports
> + to point at the newly installed port. (with thanks to Kevin Oberman)
> +
>
Does that actually work though?
Somehow it seems too simple given this discussion continues to come up
with various /var/db/pkg hacks.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
LS description, as well
as some others.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
out there. But thats not to say they should
> be supported in tree until one has at least been announced as official
> and can be pointed to and has shown to be kept just as up to date as the
> svn tree.
>
> JMO
>
The proposed patch is for git-svn. It checks out from the *of
sitory and build your own
packages with poudriere+pkgng:
http://blog.etoilebsd.net/post/Home_made_pkgng_repo
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
es (i.e. upgrading from one completely package set to another). pkgng
>> adds that feature, and I find it a must for supporting large installations
>> of
>> machines that need automated management.
>
> And as I wrote previously, I've been the
gng's problem, it's
the port.
>
> -Reko
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewe
ses the checked out Makefiles to determine the latest
version.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
wn)?
Check out ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel for an example.
It uses a known hash, but you can use tags as well. You'll need to override
FETCH_ARGS as seen there too.
>
> Thanks! Yours,
>
> -mi
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
>
>
for portupgrade.
If just switching origins, like perl5.12->perl5.14, the origin is fine.
I've logged this issue for later reconsideration:
https://github.com/pkgtools/pkgtools/issues/36
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
g-config-0.25_1 -> pkgconf-0.8.3)
- ---> Packages processed: 1 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed
- ---> Session ended at: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:52:52 +0200 (consumed
00:00:14)
>
> Pieter
>
> \___
> / Pieter Donche \________
&
It's attached to the PR ports/170283:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170283
You can apply with:
cd /usr/ports/shells/bash
fetch -o patch-37
'http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170283&getpatch=1'
patch -p0 < patch-37
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdr
On 7/26/2012 9:03 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 26.07.2012 19:41, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Check out ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel for an example.
>>
>> It uses a known hash, but you can use tags as well.
> Thanks for the pointer! Yes, that's it... The port uses a se
e same command line), and got a Ruby script error.
>
> The error occurred with portupgrade-2.4.9.6,2 and ruby-1.8.7.370,1.
This crash was fixed in 2.4.9.7, released yesterday.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/3/2012 12:52 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
>>> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>>> I see we still are on patch level 028.
>
>
irrm share/licenses/zsh-5.0.0
@unexec rmdir %D/share/licenses 2>/dev/null || true
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
--- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.orig 2012-08-04 02:22:29.0 +0200
+++ /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk 2012-08-04 02:32:20.0 +0200
@@ -5692,6
possible to achieve with bsd.local.mk [2], but it
would be much nicer to support without needing to customize your checkout.
[1] https://ccache.samba.org/manual.html#_environment_variables
[2] http://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/ccache.wiki
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode
On 8/4/2012 8:16 AM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:05:54 -0500
> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ports/169579 is currently tracking this.
>>
>> This patch adds ccache support to ports (off by default). Other
>> patches have changed $CC to use
On 8/4/2012 7:38 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 4 August 2012 15:21, RW wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 09:42:39 -0500
>> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>>>> Having a default ccache directory in the makefile that's different
>>>> from the default doc
nly feedback is to make the auto-delete on
deinstall be optional in bsd.port.mk. They may turnaround and reinstall
it right away and not want to waste the bandwidth again.
Makes sense for port building tools to wipe the old files on upgrade!
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery
On 8/6/2012 9:38 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 06:34 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/6/2012 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I would also like to see us embed the distfile information, either in
>>> +CONTENTS or in its own file. This information is ver
NOBS file is deprecated. The new file is Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk,
which has similar length comments and restrictions.
The limit *does* matter as otherwise the description
a) Gets cut off
b) Wraps, causing display issues on 8.x and 7.x.
If you find descriptions that are cut off or wrapping, ple
;emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod"
>
> The nvidia driver now fails. How can I circumvent this nasty problem? Is
> there a "brute force" knob.
>
> Will ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel heal those problems?
The main problem I see is with --check-dep
t comment
still stands though, portmaster will store distifile information in
/var/db/pkg.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On 8/7/2012 5:17 PM, AN wrote:
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #29 r238959: Tue Jul 31
> 19:51:57 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> Trying to update graphics/libglut on current as per UPDATING, and
> nothing happens.
>
> "20120804:
> AFFECTS: u
On 8/7/2012 5:22 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/7/2012 5:17 PM, AN wrote:
>> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #29 r238959: Tue Jul 31
>> 19:51:57 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>>
>> Trying to update graphics/libglut on c
On 8/9/2012 8:26 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>>
>> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders o
On 8/20/2012 12:57 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I utilize FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and build the OS with CLANG as well as
> ports, which are compatible building with clang, using the well known
> settings in /etc/make.conf and /etc/src/conf.
>
> I use ports-mgmt/pkg (1.0-r6) and recently in combination wi
On 8/23/2012 5:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
> /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
> confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
> is run vs. the first time
On 8/23/2012 5:38 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> But if we rename, when and who runs it? Will we update bsd.port.mk to
> run it if needed?
Duh, ports-mgmt/pkg is already a PKG_DEPENDS in ports. So it gets pulled
in with WITH_PKGNG.
Bryan
___
freebsd
On 8/24/2012 9:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:23:47PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>>
>>> On of the thing I forgot and kan@ has added is a prompt for the user in
>>> case it
>>> is going to bootstrap.
>>
>> So, removing the prompt will m
On 8/24/2012 11:02 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:50:30AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/24/2012 9:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:23:47PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>>>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto
oing this, I updated from r238438
> to r239708.
>
> Bye,
> Alexander.
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
epen the roots of something that has no
> relevance.
>
> Can we please just deal with this now and be done with it? ... and yes,
> I am volunteering to help with and/or do the work myself.
Yes please.
If we can't agree to mass delete them with churn, let's at least agree
to rem
show in Makefile,
> getting run time interfaces sorted was Work).
>
> Let ports creators retain their one line of credit. Removing it
> would save little & be ungrateful, like removing names out of .c
> & .h. (Some (inc. me) may like noticing in
On 8/27/2012 2:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> It seems that if lang/gcc46 is installed, and then you attempt to update
> it, lang/gcc shows up in the output of build-depends-list,
> run-depends-list, or perhaps both. If lang/gcc46 is not installed
> already, this doesn't happen.
>
> This
On 8/30/2012 8:43 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ Mark Felder wrote on Thu 30.Aug'12 at 7:01:43 -0500 ]
>
>> I think you're very confused about what pkgng is for. At this time, ports
>> are STILL the recommended way to install things and keep them up to date.
>> Pkgng is the first step requ
On 8/30/2012 10:43 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Thanks to everyone involved.
>
> I've been lightly testing pkg for a little while, but I still mainly use
> ports. This announcement prompted me to switch from portupgrade to
> portupgrade-devel (20120827 version) to see how it works with PKGNG. I
>
On 8/31/2012 11:03 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Glen Barber wrote:
>>> How about the ability to add new commands to "pkg"?
>>> For example something like "pkg cutleaves" via plugins would be cool.
>>
>> I think 'pkg autoremove' already does this.
>
> Does autoremove show you all the leaves and ask
On 8/31/2012 10:15 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 31 August 2012 09:15, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> No, because it already knows which you installed and which were pulled
>> in as dependencies. There's a recent thread on ports@ regarding pkg2ng
>> and marking your impo
On 9/1/2012 2:46 PM, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> Support for plugins which provide new commands in pkgng has been committed.
Very cool!
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
h
pkg
> pkg: /usr/sbin/pkg /usr/local/man/man8/pkg.8.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg
> [root@FBSD10 ~]# ls -l /usr/sbin/pkg
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16256 Sep 3 13:55 /usr/sbin/pkg
>
> If I do not want to use pkg do I need an entry in /etc/src.conf? How do
> you disable pkg? How do
On 9/3/2012 10:45 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> These errors are a problem with bsd.port.mk. I've been meaning to write
> up a patch for a while now and get to bapt for testing. If he doesn't
> get to it first, I'll get one submitted soon.
I've filed ports/171326
On 9/4/2012 12:17 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the
> default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up
> there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake
> upgrade, and other wide scale changes.
>
>
On 9/4/2012 11:36 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> WITH_CCACHE_BUILD="yes" seems to be working... howsoever a few (2) times
> recently, portmaster would complete entirely (signaled by the 'yell' command
> as " && yell", but returning to that tty0 (xterm or...) the compiler will be
> still working o
On 9/4/2012 12:41 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> dialogwrapper has now been committed to Tools/scripts in /usr/ports.
> Further testing is requested.
>
>
> What is dialogwrapper?
>
> dialogwrapper is a wrapper script for dialog(1) that works around some
> bugs and takes advantage of new features to m
On 9/4/2012 3:29 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> ===> apache22-worker-mpm-2.2.22_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
> apache-worker-2.2.22_5
>
> They install files into the same place.
> You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C.
You can just change the origin:
portmaster -o www
done with 1 port, and that has been reverted due
to not having a known distinfo.
The preferred way is to just do snapshot updates. That way the user is
alerted to new versions. Otherwise they are sitting on this ""
version forever until they *force* reinstall to get an upgrade.
--
reeBSD
> 8.2-PRERELEASE #26: Sun
> Jan 23 18:42:22 JST 2011
> turut...@h116.65.226.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net:/usr/local/work/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POLYMER13
>
> amd64
This is now fixed by r303796.
It will take a while before portsnap picks up the change.
Here is the
On 9/8/2012 7:28 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) -> 'apache22'
> (www/apache22)
> ---> Upgrading 'apache-2.2.22_6' to 'apache22-2.2.22_8' (www/apache22)
> ---> Building '/usr/ports/www/apache22' with make flags: -DWITH_PROXY
> -DWITH
first
> match.
This would definitely be a huge plus.
>
> Chris
>
> [1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/shells/bash/Makefile?rev=1.73
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
-q
> query-pr: no PRs matched
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> olli
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubs
On 9/13/2012 10:06 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> while committing an update for sysutils/ldap-account-manager I got this
> message:
>
> """
> SendingMakefile
> Sendingdistinfo
> Sendingpkg-descr
> Sendingpkg-plist
> Transmitting file data svn:
.if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MOPTION) && ${PORT_OPTIONS:MOPTION}
Is
If not set and is set
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2012, at 7:25, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> How to express "option is not set" with new options style? I need
> complex condition like "OPT1 is set and O
er ways of requiring dependent options.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
p 14 05:13:23 PDT 2012
> r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
>
>
> My ports tree is at r304266; the installed ports are all up-to-date
> with respect to that.
>
> Aam I doing something obviously silly or stupid?
>
> Thanks
>
> Peace,
On 9/18/2012 11:43 AM, Lars Eighner wrote:
> Portupgrade says multimedia/mjpegtools is marked IGNORE (needs SDL)
>
> But I have mucho SDL: sdl-1.2.15_2,2; sdl_gfx; sdl_net; sdl_sound;
> dgen_sdl; linux-f10-sdl; linux-f10-sdl_image; linux-f10-sdl_mixer;
> gstreamer-plugins-sdl...
>
> What SDL doe
On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
> database, it is even on fast boxes sometimes in the range of a minute or
> even two.
You mean ports-mgmt/portupgrad
On 10/5/2012 10:40 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 10/05/12 17:28, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>> On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
>>> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the loc
On 10/8/2012 8:30 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
>> target
>> becomes impossible:
>>
>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
>> part
>> is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOM
On 8/30/2012 10:43 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Portupgrade doesn't remove the pkgdb.db.lock reliably.
> Portupgrade doesn't handle stale lock files (just waits indefinitely for a
> nonexistent process to finish). A big problem when combined with the above.
I have not run into these issues. Do you h
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/239663
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/239664
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscr
or patched your portmaster
previously?
Note I am not suggesting you do this. I am asking to better assist.
> Thanks.
>
> Mitja
>
> http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://l
rver
> offline and route mail to another whilst I get this sorted.
>
> Surely someone else has had this issue today, or recently. ???
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
1 - 100 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
