On 08/26/2011 12:30, Carmel wrote:
> After updating my system as per the UPDATING file, I now find that the
> Nvidia driver no longer works with Xorg.
Did you rebuild the nvidia module?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Howdy,
Doing some port updates and noticed that mail/postfix-policyd-spf relies
on mail/libspf2-10, which according to
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2ddbfd29-a455-11dd-a55e-00163e16.html
is vulnerable. There is a port of mail/libspf2 which is not vulnerable,
is it possible to update mail/postfi
On 8/26/2011 10:27 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
> I had ghostscript8 installed, but after an ordinary upgrade (I think, I mean,
> I don't recall doing anything unusual), I ended up with ghostscript9. After
> that, portmaster complained that ghostscript8 was a dependency for a couple
> of
> the other i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/27/2011 11:07, Uffe R. B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 26-08-2011 22:22, Doug Barton skrev:
>> Howdy,
>
>> Doing some port updates and noticed that mail/postfix-policyd-spf
>> relies on mail/libspf2-10, whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/27/2011 15:36, Uffe R. B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 27-08-2011 23:05, Doug Barton skrev:
>>> libspf2 port is currently libspf2-1.2.9_1 and according to the
>>> page you refer to, the vulnerability affects libspf2 <1.2.8
On 8/28/2011 10:46 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 19:41:02 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> just a brain flash: bsd.port.mk currently re-prompts OPTIONS if
>> they've changed, for instance, through addition.
>>
>> Should we change this feature in b.p.mk so that it also re-prompt
On 8/28/2011 11:33 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Apparently, this have to be written explicitely. Users, who upgrade
> their ports, are not presented with the configuration dialog.
The dialog is re-presented to the user if the quantity of options has
changed. That's a feature. See my previous messa
On 8/28/2011 1:54 PM, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:30 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Criminal? Indifference? This sort of troll-ish hyperbole is decidedly
>> unhelpful.
FWIW, I agree with Sahil that this post of Jerry's was over the top, as
several of his have been o
On 8/28/2011 3:28 PM, Michal Varga wrote:
> Not every person that doesn't write in pink letters is
> necessarilly a troll, and not every person making a sarcastic comment
> about a pretty frustrating situation is there to make a personal attack
> (on you, or anyone else).
Being frustrated and/or a
Including postmaster@ on this since IMO Jerry has earned himself a short
vacation from posting privileges.
On 8/28/2011 3:40 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:43:14 -0700
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> On 8/28/2011 1:54 PM, Michal Varga wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2
On 8/28/2011 4:22 PM, Micheas Herman wrote:
> The debate about software patents
... is pretty seriously off-topic. :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
On 08/28/2011 17:24, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:26:29 -0700
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> Including postmaster@ on this since IMO Jerry has earned himself a
>> short vacation from posting privileges.
>
> Perhaps you would care to tell me yourself. I
On 08/28/2011 19:19, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 14:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 8/28/2011 1:54 PM, Michal Varga wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:30 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> Criminal? Indifference
On 08/28/2011 19:43, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 14:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> If you're talking about the recent ruby update, an enormous amount of
>> work went into that prior to the trigger being pulled in an effort to
>> make it as smooth
On 08/28/2011 22:34, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:00 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I think it would be a mistake to believe that we don't have any quality
>> control at all. I do think it's reasonable to ask whether what we have
>> is adequate, and
On 08/29/2011 00:07, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 23:30 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Testing only for "Does it still build?" won't help much anymore if the
>>> new version silently broke one of the APIs and while Apache still runs
>>
On 08/12/2011 04:07, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:28:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I notice that http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156253
>> exists for the 1.46.1 update, however 1.47 is out since July 11. I'm
>> curiou
On 8/29/2011 12:31 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Doug Barton writes:
>
>> rebuilt those 2 against the new boost libs. qbittorrrent starts up Ok,
>> but then it ends up freezing solid, needing to be killed. On the console
>> I get a whole bunch of these:
>>
>
On 8/29/2011 8:07 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> I would like to apply this patch
> (http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer/patches/speling.diff) which fixes
> a few spelling mistakes in the COMMENT field for some
> unmaintained ports:
Thank you for taking this on. :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't
I'm doing some updates and came across mail/postfix-policyd-spf which
relies on mail/libspf2-10. The latter had a vuxml entry added on
2008-10-27. So my question is, why has mail/libspf2-10 been allowed to
remain in the tree vulnerable for almost 3 years?
Wouldn't it make more sense to mark vulner
On 08/29/2011 23:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
> So, the right answer may be "it depends".
I think my point is, it shouldn't. If a port is important/popular than
it will be quickly fixed. If not, it goes away. Everyone wins.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On 08/30/2011 08:29, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:48:31PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I'm doing some updates and came across mail/postfix-policyd-spf which
>> relies on mail/libspf2-10. The latter had a vuxml entry added on
>> 2008-10-27. So my questio
On 09/02/2011 02:24, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Finally, I recommend to install ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves and
> run it regularly after updates
portmaster -s does the same thing.
FYI,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
B
On 09/02/2011 02:39, Michel Talon wrote:
> Your answer is very interesting and allows me to go further in the
> reasoning. Indeed the UPDATING file is here to solve edge cases. My
> point is that there shouldn't be any edge cases, if there are some it is
> because something somewhere has been ill d
On 09/02/2011 06:25, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> On 09/02/2011 02:24, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>> Finally, I recommend to install ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves and
>>> run it regularly after updates
>>
>> portmaster -s does
Subject: cvs commit: ports/www/pyblosxom Makefile
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 23:44:44 + (UTC)
From: Doug Barton
To: ports-committ...@freebsd.org, cvs-po...@freebsd.org, cvs-...@freebsd.org
dougb 2011-09-02 23:44:44 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
www/pyblosxom
On 09/02/2011 14:58, Lars Eighner wrote:
> The main thing here, of course, is that ports uses "dependency" in the
> exact
> opposite of its normal English sense (just as twitter uses "following" in
> the exact opposite of its normal English sense).
>
> In normal Engish 'X is a dependency of Y' mea
On 09/03/2011 07:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> In normal English, I would not expect
hence my recommendation to go do some research. :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of kn
More below ...
On 08/29/2011 23:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:48:31PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Can someone explain why this would be a bad idea?
>
> Very early in my committer career, I marked a port BROKEN that kde
> depended on. I was quickly chast
On 09/05/2011 02:53, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just FYI, I accidentally stopped the jail which built the portaudit database
> a few days ago and didn't notice since I had forgotten the portaudit database
> was actually built there. It has been fixed now.
Thank you! :)
--
On 09/05/2011 02:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 4 September 2011 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Whoops, also missed a CVE -- buffer overflows can cause a DoS.
Expiration date altered to 1 month accordingly.
>>>
>>> It is not responsible to threaten to remove p
On 09/05/2011 16:35, wen heping wrote:
> Would you send a PR of repocopy to rename these ports?
My understanding is that we don't do port names with . in them. Can
someone who knows more than I confirm one way or the other?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On 09/05/2011 22:48, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/05/2011 02:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>>>>> It is not responsible to threaten to remove ports without
>>>>> warning between releases for non urgent reasons.
>>
>> W
On 09/06/2011 00:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> we already have plenty of portnames with dot in them
That's not a good reason to add more.
I did read the rest of your post, and while I sympathize with your
arguments, I'm not convinced by them. The good news for you however is
that I'm not in ch
On 09/07/2011 00:07, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Better to deprecate such non urgent ports, & wait a while
>>>>>>> after next release is rolled, to give release users a warning
>>>>>>&g
On 9/7/2011 10:02 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/07/2011 00:07, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Better to deprecate such non urgent ports, & wait a while
>>>>>&g
... otherwise it misses the need to upgrade xproto, thus:
checking for XSET... configure: error: Package requirements (xproto >=
7.0.17 xmuu) were not met:
Requested 'xproto >= 7.0.17' but version of Xproto is 7.0.16
Index: Makefile
===
The way that the FreeBSD project handles deleted ports is to leave them
in the CVS repository, where they are easily available to everyone who
would like to access them.
However I think that your idea is interesting, and I'd love to see the
people who are deeply concerned about deleted ports pursu
On 09/11/2011 13:35, Warren Block wrote:
> Let me suggest a reasonable[1] plan:
No. :) No more talking is necessary. Doing is necessary (or not,
doesn't really matter to me at this point).
I think Chris is right, a reasonable first step is a Handbook section on
"How to recover a port from the CV
On 09/12/2011 12:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Eric.
> You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 21:33:58:
>
>> Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports
>> website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which
>> what I think you want.
> Oh. For gcc4
On 09/12/2011 12:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> How could I determine which ports are directly lined with libgcc from
> gcc44? ldd?
Yes, that's really the only answer. I have the following function which
would work:
old_libs ()
{
local file nf;
[ -e ~/old-lib-list ] && unlink ~/old-lib-li
On 09/12/2011 16:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> We all make mistakes from time to time. Michal could have pointed out
> the mistake and still been nice about it. I know for myself that when I
> make a mistake like this that I feel bad enough as it is, and I don't
> need anyone rubbing it i
Howdy,
A couple of recent threads have mentioned clever ways to search for
dependencies. One problem ... there aren't any. :) The *only* safe way
to make sure you have found all possible references to a dependency is
to grep the entire ports tree (grep -r category/portname /usr/ports/*).
There ar
On 09/21/2011 01:45, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Do I lose anything by turning off this option (DNSSD)?
When you try it, what happens?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the
Thanks for letting us know.
FYI, there is currently no maintainer for this port in the FreeBSD tree,
so if any of our users want to take this on they should submit a PR.
Doug
On 09/21/2011 11:03, Ben Greear wrote:
> Hello BSD maintainers!
>
> If you have any patches to help make xorp 1.8.4 wo
On 09/25/2011 08:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 25 September 2011 15:06, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> > ftp ftp.dti.ad.jp
>> > Trying 202.216.228.228:21 ...
>> > Connected to ftp.dti.ad.jp.
>> > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection.
Are you still seeing this? It's working fo
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
> Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
> got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>>> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmas
On 09/30/2011 02:40, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi, Doug.
>
> You just removed www/pyblosxom. But we have a pr, that update it to
> latest (not-vulnerable) version: http://bugs.freebsd.org/160682.
Julien took that PR, when he's ready to do the update he can pull the
files out of the Attic.
Do
On 09/30/2011 02:54, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote on 30.09.2011 13:50:
>> On 09/30/2011 02:40, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> Hi, Doug.
>>>
>>> You just removed www/pyblosxom. But we have a pr, that update it to
>>> latest (not-vulner
On 09/30/2011 11:05, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote on 30.09.2011 22:04:
>> On 09/30/2011 02:54, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote on 30.09.2011 13:50:
>>>> On 09/30/2011 02:40, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Dou
I'm on 9-current r225756 amd64. Since the latest version of libreoffice
was committed I always get stuck with cppunittest pegging the cpu at
100% and never completing. I've tried removing the port and letting
libreoffice reinstall it as a dependency, no luck.
Here's where I'm getting stuck:
-
On 10/03/2011 07:32, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> I have the same problem (9.0 BETA3 amd64)
>
> When I set libreoffice's DEBUG option, the build (`make`) does complete.
Thanks, that gave me some new places to look. I had the following in
make.conf:
CFLAGS+= -g
DEBUG_FLAGS+= -g
Commenting
Howdy,
Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= true in the
Makefile. Also, once it got built, it failed to package:
===> Building package for chicken-4.7.0
tar: lib/chicken/6/modules.db: Cannot stat: No such
stas,
If I don't choose the THREADS option I get this. Looks like it needs
some PLIST_SUB action.
Thanks,
Doug
tar: lib/ocaml/caml/threads.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: lib/ocaml/condition.mli: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: lib/ocaml/event.mli: Cannot stat: No s
On 10/06/2011 05:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
Right, because the EXPIRATION_DATE arrived and all the reasons for
removing it were still valid.
I really don't need to explain to you that the files are still in the
attic, and that if
In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)
Doug
On 10/07/2011 09:15, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> ume 2011-10-07 16:15:47 UTC
>
> FreeBSD por
On 10/05/2011 15:19, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
>> all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= true in the
>> Makefile.
>
> True.
Do you mind if I go ahead and add th
On 10/08/2011 00:41, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/05/2011 15:19, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
>>>> all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs M
It's been quite a few weeks that this empty/pointless message has been
sent to the list, what needs to happen to make it stop?
On 10/10/2011 04:08, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote:
> Note: to view an individual PR, use:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
>
> The following is a lis
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
tools to work with:
http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
You need to do the equivalent of '
On 10/10/2011 14:48, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's been quite a few weeks that this empty/pointless message has been
>> sent to the list, what needs to happen to make it stop?
>
> Assign bugs to ports@ - then it won
On 10/10/2011 15:00, Nali Toja wrote:
> Doug Barton writes:
>
>> Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
>> that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
>> that those interested in working with ports on 10-curre
On 10/09/2011 09:29, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:52 -0700
>>>>>> Doug Barton said:
>
> dougb> In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on
> 10.0
> dougb> because it uses
Building a package on 8.2-RELEASE I get this:
===>>> Creating a package for new version mapnik2-2.0.0
tar: lib/mapnik2/input/sqlite.input: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256
Previous version
On 10/12/2011 09:36, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Fixed. This was caused by an invalid assignment in ports/158904
> confusing the script.
Thanks!
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowl
Well I have good news of a sort. I was previously working with a
world/kernel that was built by clang. I finally had a chance to rebuild
with the stock gcc, and now that I have, libreoffice builds and runs
just fine with the GTK option the only one selected (i.e., no debug).
So hopefully this will
On 10/16/2011 15:49, Ted Hatfield wrote:
>
> A quick google search shows
>
> re-alpine
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/develop
> http://re-alpine.sourceforge.net/
>
> The continuation of the Alpine email client from University of Washington.
>
> Maybe you would like to create a p
On 10/17/2011 16:09, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2011 4:33:22 PM Douglas Berry wrote:
>> I found I needed to pkg_delete ortp\* first,
>> then linphone-base buit.
> Yes, this is indeed a working fix. I discovered this earlier as well, but by
> the time I had enough free time to sea
On 10/17/2011 23:22, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> When I do
>
> pkg_version -vIL=
>
> It returns
>
> isc-dhcp31-server-3.1.ESV_1,1 ! Comparison failed
>
>
> I cannot find any mention in UPDATING that the port should be upgraded.
>
> How should I handle this?
Upgrade to a supported versi
Any ideas? :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
__
On 10/14/2011 21:10, wen heping wrote:
> I could not reproduce this plist error
Here is my build log:
http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/mapnik-build.log
I included 'make showconfig' output ... perhaps we're using different
options?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' cha
On 10/19/2011 04:53, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> Op wo 19 okt 2011 00:37:37 schreef Doug Barton:
>> On 10/14/2011 21:10, wen heping wrote:
>>> I could not reproduce this plist error
>>
>> Here is my build log:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/mapnik-b
On 10/10/2011 06:45, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 10/10/11 07:23, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
>>> tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
>>
>> I agree with
Did I miss a response to this issue? Will filing a PR help?
Doug
On 10/05/2011 15:44, Doug Barton wrote:
> stas,
>
> If I don't choose the THREADS option I get this. Looks like it needs
> some PLIST_SUB action.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
>
> tar:
On 10/22/2011 01:06, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from kron24 :
>
>> OP may want to look on 'make config-recursive'.
>
> Sometimes, perhaps when selecting options results in subsequent dialogs,
> 'make config-recursive' doesn't do all the first time, meaning I get
> subsequent dialogs.
>
> I run 'm
On 10/22/2011 00:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:15:36 -0700
> Doug Barton mentioned:
>
>> Did I miss a response to this issue? Will filing a PR help?
>>
>
> Hey, Doug!
>
> Sorry for the long response, but I've been cought with ports
On 10/27/2011 09:27, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> As crees@ suggested, I'm sending an email to ports@ about this.
>>
>> What really bothers me when I use the FreeBSD Ports tree on one of my
>> systems, is that the behaviour o
On 10/31/2011 00:38, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 31/10/2011 07:28, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 09:27, Scott Lambert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
>>>> What really bothers me when I use the FreeBSD Ports tree on one o
On 10/31/2011 16:06, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I get
>
> pkg_version -vIL=
> poppler-gtk-0.16.7 ! Comparison failed
>
>
> portmaster --check-depends
>
> Checking poppler-gtk-0.16.7
> ===>>> /usr/ports/graphics/poppler-gtk does not exist
> ===>>> This port shou
On 10/31/2011 03:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> What has to be done after an update is often very specific, though.
That's why I proposed that there should be a knob for the port
maintainer to include the standard version of the script, or not. If
there are more heavily customized things that need
Are you sure your ports tree is up to date? The first few ports you
listed don't check out ...
On 10/31/2011 17:56, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> OK, the list is actually smaller than I had mentioned earlier. My
> first list included ports not mentioned in the categories' README.html
> files as wel
On 10/31/2011 21:11, Doug Barton wrote:
> Are you sure your ports tree is up to date? The first few ports you
> listed don't check out ...
D'oh! I slightly misunderstood what you meant when you said "category's
makefile," but I got it now. Still
On 11/01/2011 12:46, Luis Salazar wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> First of all, tnx a lot for mantaining the MariaDB port. I was wondering, due
> to the NoSQL fashion wave we live in, Handlersocket comes as a nice option to
> have... MariaDB team claims (on their website) it comes ready to use on 5.3
> vers
The korean/unfonts-ttf (which korean/xpdf depends on) has this:
IGNORE= was splitted into korean/unfonts-core and
korean/unfonts-extra
I'd like to remove korean/unfonts-ttf, but korean/xpdf is the last port
still depending on it. Do you think that you could update it?
Doug
--
mail/rspamd has an optional dependency on security/p5-Digest-SHA256,
which has the following:
DEPRECATED= use the builtin Digest::SHA instead
Do you think you could update the port?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
On 11/02/2011 02:11, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Hi Doug!
>
> You just removed java/jde, but you forgot to look at prs for a fix.
> There is one (author Cced) with an update to a version that does fetch:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158204
>
> Since the new version is call
On 11/02/2011 03:42, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 01:34 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> mail/rspamd has an optional dependency on security/p5-Digest-SHA256,
>> which has the following:
>>
>> DEPRECATED= use the builtin Digest::SHA instead
>>
>>
Thanks for reporting this. FYI your pattern missed a few, and picked up
a few false positives in the perl ports with WWW::, but I fixed all the
ones I could find. (Of course that's not saying I didn't miss a few too.)
Doug
On 11/06/2011 05:42, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It's a tr
On 11/10/2011 03:06, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>> They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything about those,
>> that
>> is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The "not used anymore" mean not
>> used in
>
> Why should we go through
On 11/11/2011 14:15, Xin LI wrote:
> (I just picked one message to do a reply-all, not specific to any one
> single message but all of them).
>
> Technically speaking the current approach's problem is that the user
> might have no chance of seeing it before the port is removed.
That's going to b
On 11/11/2011 20:28, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Benny Goemans wrote:
>>> Is it possible to bring back the port so I can submit that change so
>>> that at
>>> least some people can use it again?
>>
>> I've just added
I'm running r227447 and get the following:
cc -O2 -pipe -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX
-DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS
-DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
-nostdinc -Iinclude -I. -Ir0drv -I. -I@ -I@/contr
On 11/12/2011 00:03, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> look for the patch in ports/162186
Thanks. I found the patch, but if I download it and turn it into
patch-foo and try to build the port, all hunks fail to apply. Normally
I'd just apply by hand and regenerate, but it's a big patch. Has anyone
produce
On 11/13/2011 12:25, Mikhail T. wrote:
> You've gone from "small minority of other interested parties" to "no one
> has made a peep" in a single e-mail! If this is the quality of the rest
> of your reasoning, than you should not be surprised, that it has not
> really resonated despite the "endless
On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> It should be
>
> MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}
> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg
Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the
distfile mirror became the only working master site by default.
Please provide a proper master
On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> By its
>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port
>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no
>>>> PO
On 11/16/2011 00:27, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" <mailto:do...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> > It should be
>> >
>> > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_L
On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not
> representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run,
> but hey, what do I know.
I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :)
However given the pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/17/2011 08:31, Albert Thiel wrote:
> I have been hearing that since last night DNS 0-day exploitation is
> taking place all over the net.
I dislike the term "0-day" because it means different things to
different people. What is true is that a
501 - 600 of 1534 matches
Mail list logo
