> Why compile ports directly on a box that is so hardware constrained that it
> will take multiple hours to do, when a "pkg update; pkg upgrade" takes only
> a few minutes?
I tried really hard to run small virtual machine (1GB RAM, 25G disk) hosted at
Hetzner
without using ports and can say it's
On 05.10.2017 04:22, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I did not state that the "environment is constrained by poudriere".
> The environment is contrained due to resource limits. If you
> only have 1 Gb of memory and 5-10 GB diskspace, then using poudriere
> with zfs and jails is a nonstarter. Yes, I'm aware
Hello again,
cleaned up and submitted as
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222790
Found that there was an old PR still hanging around with similar devd
patch, which you had already provided, but it was never applied. Well,
this one superseeds it :)
Glad to hear it works 24/7! Sam
On 05.10.2017 08:14, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Poudriere wants to be everything to everybody
First poudriere will have to learn how to run without noticeable overhead
compared to "just build from ports" before it could became "everything to
everybody"
and it needs to became part of base system fo
> On 5. Oct 2017, at 9:47 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> On 05.10.2017 08:14, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
>> Poudriere wants to be everything to everybody
>
> First poudriere will have to learn how to run without noticeable overhead
> compared to "just build from ports" before it could became "ev
Quoting Adam Weinberger (from Wed, 4 Oct 2017
19:14:22 -0600):
Portmaster is still very much a part of the current landscape, and
if somebody steps in to fix it (which I have every expectation will
happen eventually), it will continue being a usable alternative.
It would help to have a l
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:27:11PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> > The system in question is my last i686 laptop, which I
> > use for libm development and testing. Once I cannot use
> > that laptop (whether hardware failure or inability to
> > update the installed ports), I'll stop worrying about a
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Wednesday 04 Oct 2017 16:39:25 Ernie Luzar wrote:
> Here's my take on that.
>
> The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders 2
> years ago with their development of a better pkg system.
>
> The package system with flavors will cover 90% of the user community
> needs. T
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:35:58AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:27:11PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> > > The system in question is my last i686 laptop, which I
> > > use for libm development and testing. Once I cannot use
> > > that laptop (whether hardware failure
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 07:51:16AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:35:58AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:27:11PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> > > > The system in question is my last i686 laptop, which I
> > > > use for libm development and tes
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:59:41PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 07:51:16AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:35:58AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:27:11PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> > > > > The system in quest
> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:59:41PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 07:51:16AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:35:58AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:27:11P
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 08:25:20AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:59:41PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 07:51:16AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:35:58AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 201
hey there - i was doing usual maintaince on my systems today and noticed
that when upgrading the collectd5 pkg it pulls in 72 new dependencies,
mostly xorg related. here's a gist of the upgrade command exhibiting
this. the platform 11.1-RELEASE:
https://gist.github.com/nomadlogic/53e81ba377a
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> > Which brings me back to my i686 laptop with limited resources.
> > If portmgr makes it impractical/impossible to easily install ports
> > without a sledge hammer, then testing
> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
>>> Which brings me back to my i686 laptop with limited resources.
>>> If portmgr makes it impractical/impossible to easily
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:52:51AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
(courtesy long-line wrap)
> You seem to be fully convinced in a conspiracy to destroy
> portmaster, and I don't get the impression that I'm going
> to change your mind. All I can tell you is that impending
> portmaster breakage is N
On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Here's my take on that.
The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders 2
years ago with their development of a better pkg system.
[putolin]
Don't let the few old school die hearts who are afraid of any change and
make the most
On 05/10/2017 18:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:52:51AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
(courtesy long-line wrap)
You seem to be fully convinced in a conspiracy to destroy
portmaster, and I don't get the impression that I'm going
to change your mind. All I can tell you is tha
On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Here's my take on that.
The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders
2 years ago with their development of a better pkg system.
[putolin]
Don't let the few old school die hearts who are
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
> > On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
> >>> wrote: Which brings me back to my i686 laptop with limited resource
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:54:32 -0400 Baho Utot wrote
> On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
>
> > Here's my take on that.
> >
> > The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders 2
> > years ago with their development of a better pkg system.
> >
>
> [putolin]
>
> > Don't l
On 05/10/2017 21:53, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
wrote: Which brings me back to my i686 laptop with
On 10/05/17 16:27, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Here's my take on that.
The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders
2 years ago with their development of a better pkg system.
[putolin]
Don
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:27:19 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
> On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
> >
> >> Here's my take on that.
> >>
> >> The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders
> >> 2 years ago with their development
> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 15:53, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
>
>>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
> wrote: Which bri
On 10/05/17 14:53, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl
wrote: Which brings me back to my i686 laptop with lim
On 05/10/2017 22:08, Baho Utot wrote:
On 10/05/17 16:27, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Here's my take on that.
The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD
leaders 2 years ago with their development of
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:05:05 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
> On 05/10/2017 21:53, Chris H wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
> >
> >>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
> >>> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:13:36 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
> > On 5 Oct, 2017, at 15:53, Chris H wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
> >
> >>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
> >>> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger w
On 05/10/2017 22:27, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:05:05 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
On 05/10/2017 21:53, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wr
On 05/10/2017 22:15, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:27:19 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Here's my take on that.
The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders
2 years ago with their devel
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:59:31 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
> On 05/10/2017 22:15, Chris H wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:27:19 + Grzegorz Junka wrote
> >
> >> On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote:
> >>>
> Here's my take on that.
>
> >
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Mike Clarke wrote:
the currently available package is built against php56. Using poudriere for
this one task would
be equivalent to using a steamroller to crack a peanut. Building phpMyAdmin
from ports is no
great problem for me and perhaps future deve
On 10/05/17 18:13, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> [...]
>> Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified
>> individuals to work with me on it in a new thread.
>>
>> Thanks for your time, and consideration
>
> [...]
> Let me know what you need. I'll give you whatever support I can
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 19:59:51 -0400 George Mitchell
wrote
> On 10/05/17 18:13, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified
> >> individuals to work with me on it in a new thread.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your time, and consideration
> >
>
On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:37:08 -0700 "Chris H" wrote
> > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote
---8<---8<---
> > > Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified
> > > individuals to work with me on it in a new thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your time, and c
Dear m.tsatsenko.
I want to add 'configtest' extra_command to mail/milter-greylist
like that.
extra_commands="configtest"
configtest_cmd="/usr/local/libexec/milter-greylist -c"
--
Masachika ISHIZUKA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https:
Hi!
> > a few inquiries regarding taking maintainer for the port. My request
> > was ultimately declined. I was deemed unqualified. That judgement was
> > unfounded. :(
Right now, tz@ is the maintainer of ports-mgmt/portmaster.
If someone wants to become maintainer, the best way is to
look at th
I'd vote to have Chris H be the maintainer of this port.
Why knock the guy if he wants to invest his time and
energy into doing something to help the project?
Does it cause anyone pain to see someone working on
maintaining the project? Why would someone say no you cannot maintain this
port,
especia
Hi!
> I'd vote to have Chris H be the maintainer of this port.
> Why knock the guy if he wants to invest his time and
> energy into doing something to help the project?
> Does it cause anyone pain to see someone working on
> maintaining the project? Why would someone say no you cannot maintain thi
On 06/10/2017 00:29, tech-lists wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
>> the currently available package is built against php56. Using
>> poudriere for this one task would
>> be equivalent to using a steamroller to crack a peanut. Building
>> phpMyAdmin from ports
43 matches
Mail list logo
