Le 14/12/2016 à 06:17, Peter Jeremy a écrit :
> On 2016-Dec-13 21:32:36 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>> IMO No port should need root for
>> cd /usr/ports; make -i fetch
> In a stock FreeBSD install, all ports require root to both fetch and build.
> You have customised your system in a no
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
curlew:/root# freebsd-version -ku
11.0-RELEASE-p2
11.0-RELEASE-p5
curlew:/root# make -C /usr/ports index
Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
[snip]
--- describe.x11-toolkits ---
--- describe.x11-wm ---
make_index: /u
2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. :
> The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages
> that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes.
> That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In practice, however:
>
> 1. The Q branch is cut off at
On 15.12.2016 14:16, David Demelier wrote:
2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. :
The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages
that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes.
That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In practice, how
Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote on 2016/12/15 14:43:
The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source
based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo;
FreeBSD is the one that have the most instability. Not to mention
committers that commit without testing the port,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
5) svn repository.
I don't want to spark a holy war and I don't belong to those type of
people who are always obsessed that something isn't done in their way.
But guys, svn is not a good tool for ports. Just for one reason,
actually (as for me, I could
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been trying to get port
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild munin-master but keep running into this:
cd master && /usr/local/bin/perl Build.PL
No 'module_name' was provided and it could not be inferred
from other properties. This will prevent a packlist from
being written for this file. Please set either 'module_name'
or 'di
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been trying to get port
On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been trying to get portmaster deprecated and removed from
the
han
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
>
> > On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
> >>
> >> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is
> >> an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:16:18 +0100
David Demelier wrote:
> 2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. :
> > The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages
> > that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes.
> > That is the theory and intent behind t
On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project
itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been trying to g
On 2016/12/15 16:01, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>> The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source
>> based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo;
>> FreeBSD is the one that have the most instability. Not to mention
>> committers that commit without testing t
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is
an outside tool, there aren't any a
On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote:
On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project
itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice
Vlad K. wrote:
The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable"
packages that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and
security fixes. That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In
practice, however:
1. The Q branch is cut off at predetermined dates (ie. n
On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote:
It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well.
No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement.
portmaster was added 2006 and the portstree startet in 1994.
Can you agree t
On 15.12.2016 17:46, John Marino wrote:
On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote:
It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well.
No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement.
portmaster was added 2006 and the por
I want to talk about another issue: the testing of ports framework
We usually test our ports via poudriere or synth. We have a greate ports
framework to help us build software, and we only need to write a few
lines of code to leveage it. But ... where is the testing of the framework ?
Those code
John Marino wrote on 2016/12/15 17:46:
[1] I've got it on my todo list to provide a new method that would
eliminate the "my builder just rebuilt 150 packages, but pkg(8) only
upgraded 2 packages" issue that some users don't want to see. It's a
lot more complicated than the conservative yet bull
En línea y en Vivo / Para todo su Equipo con una sola Conexión
Auditorías a través del Buzón Tributario
29 de diciembre - Online en Vivo - 10:00 a 13:00 Hrs
A través de esta Capacitación Online en Vivo entérese cuáles son los sectores
involucrados, en qué consisten dichas auditorías,
On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
>
>> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
>>>
>>> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
>>> outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
>>> use it or die. N
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
> >>> outside tool,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:31:22 +0100
list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
> > On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Al
On 2016-Dec-15 09:43:51 +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>Le 14/12/2016 à 06:17, Peter Jeremy a écrit :
>> On 2016-Dec-13 21:32:36 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>>> IMO No port should need root for
>>> cd /usr/ports; make -i fetch
>> In a stock FreeBSD install, all ports require root to both
Greetings,
I've put up an OpenVPN 2.4-rc1 port for FreeBSD up for testing.
Get it from https://people.freebsd.org/~mandree/openvpn-2.4.r1-v1.tar.xz
Or review the diff at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8813
Cheers,
Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
net/isc-dhcp43-server: rc script does not play nice with service -e
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213463
Reported at October, added patch and poudriere log but still uncommitted.
Reminded at November and? Still not committed.
Miroslav Lachman
_
John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st on Thu Dec 15 16:46:54
UTC 2016 wrote:
> For i386 and amd64 users, synth does not require more resources than
> portmaster. People on those platforms can't use "resources" as a reason
> not to use Synth. From what I can tell, portmaster people hate what
Matthieu Volat wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:31:22 +0100
list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although portm
I am running webmail Roundcube on many machines but on one machine file
upload (attachment) doesn't work. I tracked it down to PHP extension
fileinfo. Everytime I tried to upload a file I got this error in Apache
error log:
[Fri Dec 16 02:35:27.775113 2016] [core:notice] [pid 6883] AH00052:
c
> Here, it doesn't look like that. Don't forget that /usr/ports/distfiles
> accumulates old versions and must be manually cleaned out from time to
> time. portmaster has a couple of options to remove distfiles that are
> not needed.
>
> % du -hd0 /usr/ports
> 8.1G/usr/ports
> % du -hd0 /usr/p
On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
>> On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
>> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Although portm
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
>
>>(But portupgrade could at times be an utter mess,
>>I never looked back after switching to portmaster
>>m
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
> >> On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On
2016-12-15 17:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Seaman :
> On 2016/12/15 16:01, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>>> The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source
>>> based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo;
>>> FreeBSD is the one that have the most instability. Not to me
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, at 17:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Have you considered using things like poudriere that would allow you to
> > build
> > your own repository with your own set of packages and options.
> >
> > You will benefit:
> > - ability to use pkg for your upgrades
> > - ability to use c
38 matches
Mail list logo
