Am 23.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb @lbutlr:
My executable is named /usr/local/bin/letsencrypt.sh and does not have a
certonly option.
$ letsencrypt.sh -h
Usage: /usr/local/bin/letsencrypt.sh [-h] [command [argument]] [parameter
[argument]] [parameter [argument]] ...
I have this version installed
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
I agree it's easy, but I think ports should not have such dependency.
The ports system lets you choose the SSL package (or base) you want to
build everything with. I think it's going to be problematic if a port
decides on it's own to install openssl/libressl whilst you have build
everything with a
Hi,
any skilled porters out there interested in porting current stable
version (4.4) of bestpractical's requesttracker?
https://www.bestpractical.com/
Maintainer of current maintenance release (4.2), doesn't plan to port
rt44: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208229
Unfortunatel
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 06:40:13AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> Is anyone using this port successfully?
>
> It appears to be running here, but is generating some 0 length files:
>
> total 64
> 8 -rw--- 1 443 443 1854 Mar 4 23:38 cert-1457159890.csr
> 0 -rw--- 1 443 443 0 Mar 4 23:38
On 03/22/16 15:29, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> CC'ing the list again.
Sorry about that. I'm reading this list via gmane and I pushed the wrong
button. :-)
> It's easy to check: pkg info kdelibs. The version field should say
> 4.14.3_6. If you've just built kmymoney I'd assume it would require
+--On 21 mars 2016 13:43:43 -0700 Don Lewis wrote:
| On 21 Mar, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> +--On 21 mars 2016 11:18:26 -0700 Don Lewis wrote:
|> | gnome-post-install does several different things. I haven't looked to
|> | see if all of them should be moved. Unfortunately I'm not sure that an
|> |
Hi,
the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL
and Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus
library) postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix has
SASL built in on Dovecot, but I am not sure if it will work with Dovecot
1.x an
Christian Baer writes:
> I rebuilt the kdelibs from the ports and did a make reinstall. After
> that I rebuilt KMymoney and the install worked fine. Thanks for your
> help!
I'm glad it worked. Feel free to also file a bug via bugs.freebsd.org
about KBANKING option not being on by default (I pers
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2016-03-23 13:22, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
> the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL and
> Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus library)
> postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix has SASL built in
> on Dovecot,
olli hauer wrote on 03/23/2016 13:45:
On 2016-03-23 13:22, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL and
Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus library)
postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix
Hi!
> any skilled porters out there interested in porting current stable
> version (4.4) of bestpractical's requesttracker?
> https://www.bestpractical.com/
>
> Maintainer of current maintenance release (4.2), doesn't plan to port
> rt44: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208229
Hi,
I would like to have the ability to use PGP with my favorite mailer
(alpine). But after installing security/gnupg I've no idea where to go
from there. Couldn't find a clear description in Google how to make this
work in FreeBSD and Alpine.
So what is the right way to make PGP work in mai
On 23 Mar, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 21 mars 2016 13:43:43 -0700 Don Lewis wrote:
> | I'd also like a target explicity for generating a dynamic plist that
> | runs after post-install. Doing it in post-install works most of the
> | time unless you start using post-install option helpers to in
Hello,
I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is on
FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php=5.4 to make.conf but that did not make difference.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
root@illidan.local:/usr/local/www# portmaster roundcu
On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is on
> FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php=5.4 to make.conf but that did not make difference.
> Any ideas?
Are you tracking
Guido Falsi wrote on 03/23/2016 22:56:
On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is on
FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php=5.4 to make.conf but that did not make difference.
On 2016-03-23 06:51 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote on 03/23/2016 22:56:
On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is
on
FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php
On 2016-03-23 05:56 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is
on
FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php=5.4 to make.conf but that did not make
diff
On 03/24/16 01:09, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On 2016-03-23 05:56 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this is on
>>> FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding
>>> DEFAULT_
On 2016-03-23 08:42 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/24/16 01:09, Mike Jakubik wrote:
ports tree. I guess i can try upgrading to 5.5 and hope that my
applications are compatible with it. Sigh, FreeBSD has become a PITA
lately to maintain unless everything installed is bleeding edge. In
any
case,
On 03/24/16 01:56, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On 2016-03-23 08:42 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/24/16 01:09, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
>>> ports tree. I guess i can try upgrading to 5.5 and hope that my
>>> applications are compatible with it. Sigh, FreeBSD has become a PITA
>>> lately to maintain unless
23 matches
Mail list logo
