Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus
>> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200
>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus:
>> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7.
>> You must upgrade pkg(8) first
>> ** Port marked as IGNORE:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:02:11AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus
> >> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200
> >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus:
> >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, bu
Le 23/09/2014 11:02, Michelle Sullivan a écrit :
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> [...]
>> You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade
>>
>>
>
> Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate
> them so much) are you making the package manager version a d
Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Le 23/09/2014 11:02, Michelle Sullivan a écrit :
>
>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate
>> th
On 23.09.2014 16:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate
>> them so much) are you making the package manager version a dependency of
>> a package? I can understand if there are new features that you may need
>> to use a later version
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Le 23/09/2014 11:44, Michelle Sullivan a écrit :
> Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Le 23/09/2014 11:02, Michelle Sullivan a écrit :
>>
>>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
[...]
You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade
>>> Just a thought
I've been trying to put together an update to devel/mingw32-gcc to bring it to
gcc 4.8.1 (the current version that the official MinGW gcc is at). I'm not sure
if poudriere is part of my issues or not, but here goes.
When building under a 9.x jail, the port pollutes PREFIX with
/usr/local/mingw
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Florent Peterschmitt <
flor...@peterschmitt.fr> wrote:
> I'm curious to know how you get into this mess with Debian or RH
> distros. What version of these distros?
>
> And are you sure it is impossible to uprade only the PM (package
> manager) and keep other packag
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:09:38 +0200, Baptiste wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:02:11AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> >
>> >> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus
>> >> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200
>> >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbu
I have 3 zpools.
When I reported this, I had 4G RAM, now I have 8G. This error no longer
happens, so ı must assume that it's a RAM issue (< 4G with zpool).
Regards.
-
FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/When-p
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #2 from roo4...@gmail.com ---
if we use http://repo.or.cz/w/conkeror.git?a=snapshot;h=master;sf=tgz' -O
conkeror-master.tar.gz in the Makefile we would have the latest snapshot at any
time.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
roo4...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback+|maintainer-feedback-
--
You ar
2014-09-23 15:43, Beeblebrox wrote:
I have 3 zpools.
When I reported this, I had 4G RAM, now I have 8G. This error no longer
happens, so ı must assume that it's a RAM issue (< 4G with zpool).
2014-07-18 16:34, Beeblebrox wrote:
It just occurred to me that I should mention I use core unlocking.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #147572|0 |1
is obsolete|
So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
and how to I fix it?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox| Nothing is more admirable than the fortitude with which
b...@immure.com | millionaires tolerate the disadvantages of their wealth.
Austin, TX | -
On 2014-09-23 10:08, Bob Willcox wrote:
So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
and how to I fix it?
Thanks,
Bob
print/libpaper
is the port for it.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #147601|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 10:08, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
> >
> > a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
> >
> > and how to I fix it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bob
> print/libpaper
>
> is the port for it..
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #5 from roo4...@gmail.com ---
Dear Jan;
Is you diff the final and production ready version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-por
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #6 from roo4...@gmail.com ---
also your are right about the source link. thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 10:08, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
> >
> > a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
> >
> > and how to I fix it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bob
> print/libpaper
>
> is the port for it..
On 2014-09-23 11:26, Bob Willcox wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2014-09-23 10:08, Bob Willcox wrote:
> So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
>
> a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
>
> and how to I fix it?
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
print/libpaper
is t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #7 from Jan Beich ---
Created attachment 147610
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147610&action=edit
|poudriere testport -P| log (9.3R i386)
It seems the Porter's Handbook agrees with portlint(1) but I c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #8 from Jan Beich ---
The build log also hints about CHANGES from 20140922. It's up to the maintainer
to decide when to pull the plug on partial updates.
===> Building package for conkeror-20140812
pkg-static: Warning: @di
FreeBSD 10.1-BETA2 GENERIC amd64
Building nrpe
gmake[7]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net-mgmt/nagios-plugins/work/nagios-plugins-2.0.3/plugins-root'
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 check_dhcp
/usr/ports/net-mgmt/nagios-plugins/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_dhcp
true
/usr/por
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beich ---
Created attachment 147614
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147614&action=edit
|poudriere testport -P| log (10.0R amd64, FIREFOX=on)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849
--- Comment #10 from r004 ---
What is the difference between using xulrunner from firefox port (which port is
that exactly; does it mean installing the whole firefox and thus more dep.) and
using libxul?
--
You are receiving this mail bec
On 09/23/14 21:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> FreeBSD 10.1-BETA2 GENERIC amd64
>
> Building nrpe
>
> gmake[7]: Entering directory
> `/usr/ports/net-mgmt/nagios-plugins/work/nagios-plugins-2.0.3/plugins-root'
> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 check_dhcp
> /usr/ports/net-mgmt/nagios-plugins/
Hi,
I have a Makefile for an application that provides both examples and
documentation. I created the two options in the Makefile (both enabled
by default).
The package doesn't provide any flags stock like --with-docs or
--with-examples, so I have a custom target like this:
do-build:
@cd
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Michelle Sullivan
wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus
> >> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200
> >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus:
> >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you h
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Patrick Gibson
wrote:
> Okay, I've found that the latest ports tree has 1.3.8 in ports-mgmt/pkg, so
> I'm installing it from source. Still baffled why it wasn't working. Was it
> not sent up to the official pkg servers?
>
I would guess that, since 1.3.8 needs to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
>
> I would guess that, since 1.3.8 needs to rebuild the package database,
> earlier versions of pkg can't safely install it? The port is likely special
> in that it uses the just-built pkg to install itself instead of relying on
> the insta
Patrick Gibson wrote:
> Either way, something seems broken or not well thought out.
It also appears to have broken Tinderbox, BTW. If I got that wrong, forget
I said anything. But if it's right: nice job!
AvW
--
Imbibo, ergo sum.
pgpj_I26hh29b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Patrick Gibson
wrote:
> The port I was trying to install was lang/v8 (3.18.5). I don't see
> anything in the Makefile that says it needs a particular version of pkg,
> but maybe it's hidden somewhere else. Either way, something seems broken or
> not well thought o
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 08:18:45AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Baptiste, have you had a chance to look at this? I'd like to at least
> merge the changes to the bootstrapper in base so that it doesn't seg
> fault at start on armeb, but want to make sure the URLs are finalized
> before doing
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Patrick Gibson
wrote:
>
> The port I was trying to install was lang/v8 (3.18.5). I don't see anything
> in the Makefile that says it needs a particular version of pkg, but maybe
> it's hidden somewhere else.
>
The MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION variable in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd
Currently there does not appear to be simple way to specify the
order that repositories searched for packages, or at least there
is none documented as such that I can find.
Suppose we add a 'repo_order' field to the repository specification, i.e. -
FreeBSDMyStuff: {
URL: http://myserver/${ABI
On 09/22/14 23:50, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:19 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 09/22/14 16:38, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 09/21/14 16:52, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 09/21/14 18:12, Robert_Burmeister wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III wrote
On 09/21/14 11:41
On 09/23/14 22:46, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 09/22/14 23:50, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:19 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 09/22/14 16:38, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 09/21/14 16:52, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 09/21/14 18:12, Robert_Burmeister wrote:
Willia
23.09.2014 20:26, Bob Willcox пишет:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2014-09-23 10:08, Bob Willcox wrote:
>>> So, what does this message mean (I get no output):
>>>
>>> a2ps: unknown medium `libpaper'
>>>
>>> and how to I fix it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bob
>> pr
41 matches
Mail list logo
