Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus >> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200 >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/eggdbus: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: sysutils/policykit: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/gconf2: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus-glib: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: sysutils/polkit: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dconf: >> pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you have 1.3.7. >> You must upgrade pkg(8) first >> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> - devel/dbus (marked as IGNORE) >> - devel/eggdbus (marked as IGNORE) >> - sysutils/policykit (marked as IGNORE) >> - devel/gconf2 (marked as IGNORE) >> - devel/dbus-glib (marked as IGNORE) >> - sysutils/polkit (marked as IGNORE) >> - devel/dconf (marked as IGNORE) >> ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 7 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed >> ---> Session ended at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200 (consumed 00:00:00) >> >> root:/tmp # portupgrade pkg >> >> root:/tmp # pkg upgrade pkg >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Your packages are up to date. >> >> root:/tmp # >> >> what am I missing? >> > > You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade > >
Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate them so much) are you making the package manager version a dependency of a package? I can understand if there are new features that you may need to use a later version to get those features, but making a package dependent on the package manager rather than displaying a warning that a feature is missing is the brain dead way that plagues upgrades for redhat and debian. Of course if your intent is to make FreeBSD into another Linux distro just with a different kernel, continue. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
