Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
I've recently had this issue . The following forum post provides a
decent work around for the time being:
https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47412
Also consider the following case as well:
OPTIONS_GROUP= X11
OPTIONS_GROUP_X11= OPT1 QT4 QT5
I'd like to be able to allow choosing OP
I am trying to create a port for an application that supports both Qt4
and Qt5.
Qt4 builds fine and I am using the following in the port's Makefile:
QT4_CONFIGURE_WITH=gui=qt4
QT4_USE= qt4=corelib,gui,qmake_build,linguist,uic,moc,rcc,qtestlib_build
For Qt5 I have:
QT5_CONFIGURE_WITH=g
first:
srv7# pkg -v
1.3.3
srv7# uname -a
FreeBSD srv7.host-food.ru 9.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon
Jun 9 20:12:11 MSK 2014
t...@srv7.host-food.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST-FOOD amd64
srv7#
srv7# pkg install -fy ap22-mod_geoip2
Updating repository catalogue
HostFood repository is
first:
srv7# pkg -v
1.3.3
srv7# uname -a
FreeBSD srv7.host-food.ru 9.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon
Jun 9 20:12:11 MSK 2014
t...@srv7.host-food.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST-FOOD amd64
srv7#
srv7# pkg install -fy ap22-mod_geoip2
Updating repository catalogue
HostFood repository
Hello.
On a 10.0/amd64 system:
# cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
> ...
20140730:
AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt
AUTHOR: p...@freebsd.org
libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries versions have
been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on
libg
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:53:56PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On a 10.0/amd64 system:
>
> > # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
> > ...
> > 20140730:
> > AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt
> > AUTHOR: p...@freebsd.org
> >
> > libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libr
On 08/01/14 16:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
This is not related to pkg
Thanks.
So, what's the reason?
Did I setup something wrong?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Daniel Morante wrote:
I've recently had this issue . The following forum post provides a decent
work around for the time being:
https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47412
Yes, that is why I posted here. By adding this, we can make handling
option dependencies
I updated to pkg-1.3.3 and am getting these annoying messages:
pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest/meta.txz: Not Found
pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/new_xorg/meta.txz: Not Found
They appear to be harmless, but is there a way to turn them off or can
the repository
Add devel/cask.
Cask is a project management tool for Emacs that helps automate the package
development cycle; development, dependencies, testing, building, packaging and
more.
Cask can also be used to manage dependencies for your local Emacs
configuration.
Reviewed by:bapt
Approved by:b
Hi,
when staging was introduced packages of the ports I built were automagically
generated in /usr/ports/packages. I used 'portupgrade -p' before to get that
functionality so that change was very convenient for me. Got hit by ports/184672
though. But that wasn't a problem because the '-p' option t
On 08/01/2014 09:27, Alex Keda wrote:
> first:
>
> srv7# pkg -v
> 1.3.3
> srv7# uname -a
> FreeBSD srv7.host-food.ru 9.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon
> Jun 9 20:12:11 MSK 2014
> t...@srv7.host-food.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST-FOOD amd64
> srv7#
>
>
> srv7# pkg install -fy ap22-mo
Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24? Is anybody
using it (see below), and what problems (if any) were there? The method
outlined below may or may not work - I haven't tried it. Any comments
or suggestions?
Background:
I wanted to update to Apache 24/FreeBSD 9.2. Everyt
Hi!
> Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24?
There's a PR where people are discussing this:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191471
This PR needs more testers etc.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
_
pkg-repo(8) says:
To create a package repository catalogue you must specify the
top-level directory where all the packages are stored as
repo-path. pkg repo will search the filesystem beneath repo-path
to find all the packages it con- tains. Symbolic links are
ignored, a
pkg-repo(8) says:
To create a package repository catalogue you must specify the
top-level directory where all the packages are stored as
repo-path. pkg repo will search the filesystem beneath repo-path
to find all the packages it con- tains. Symbolic links are
ignored, a
On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
On a 10.0/amd64 system:
# cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
...
20140730:
AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt
AUTHOR: p...@freebsd.org
libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries
versions have
been bumped. So you need to re
% portmaster --force-config devel/pcre
(Select the build with libedit option)
(Do not select the build with readline option)
make
...
===> Building for pcre-8.34_2
--- all ---
/usr/bin/make all-am
--- pcretest-pcretest.o ---
--- pcretest-pcre_printint.o ---
--- pcretest-pcretest.o ---
CC
% portmaster --force-config math/lapack
(Select to build/install profiled libraries)
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/math/lapack
===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
===>>> you have chosen WITH_PROFILE, but have not installed
the base system profiling libraries
WTF!.
I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been.
Its not the first message ranting about something broken.
This is a open source project, people work on it in their spare times.
I think you should know that as a src@ committer.
If you do not want to provide a patch for the problem please f
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote:
> I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been.
> Its not the first message ranting about something broken.
>
I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made
within the ports community, and no, this isn't the
22 matches
Mail list logo
