On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.

On a 10.0/amd64 system:

# cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
...
20140730:
  AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt
  AUTHOR: p...@freebsd.org

libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries versions have
  been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on
  libgcrypt.

  # portmaster -r libgcrypt
    or
  # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt
    or
  # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt
...
# pkg info -r libgcrypt|less
libgcrypt-1.6.1_1:
        libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8
        gnupg-2.0.25_1
        libxslt-1.1.28_4
# pkg info -r libxslt | less
libxslt-1.1.28_4:
        rarian-0.8.1_1
        gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2
        gtk-doc-1.18_1
        inkscape-0.48.4_4
        vala-0.20.1_1
        policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7
        raptor2-2.0.14
        xmlto-0.0.26_2
        shiboken-1.2.2
        apiextractor-0.10.10_2
        libreoffice-4.2.5_3
# portupgrade -frn libgcrypt
--->  Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
        + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1)
        + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4)
        + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1)
+ security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8)

So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"...

# libchk -v | less -S
...
Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19
        /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0
        /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so

... libreoffice is still using the old library.



Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem.

libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually provided by libxslt.

# pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib
        /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a
        /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la
        /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so
        /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8
        /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a
        /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la
        /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so
        /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2

Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so.

I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice.

I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed.



Is the command provided in "UPGRADING" wrong?
Is it yet another bug in pkg? In portupgrade? In libreoffice?
Is something wrong in my setup?

 bye & Thanks
av.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to