Re: How to run massive portmaster update without repeated interruptions?

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
On 27 October 2012 12:21, Thomas Mueller wrote: > When updating many ports with portmaster, I get frequent interruptions with a > prompt such as > ===>>> Delete gstreamer-0.10.35.tar.bz2? y/n [n] >How do I avoid this inefficiency? I don't see any way to say "yes, and please >don't ask again!"

Another impasse: conflict between poppler-glib and (nonexistent?) poppler-gtk

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
In my many-times-interrupted attempt to upgrade all ports that depend on png, I hit another snag: poppler-glib allegedly trying to install files to the same place as poppler-gtk. I find no poppler-gtk in the ports tree but find it in /var/db/pkg ; find poppler-glib in ports tree but not /var/db

Re: Another impasse: conflict between poppler-glib and (nonexistent?) poppler-gtk

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Backhaus
Note in updating: 2011-11-01 Affects: users of graphics/poppler-gtk Author: Koop Mast Reason: Poppler was update to 0.18.0, and the gtk slave port was renamed to match the library it installs. Please run the following command to migrate. # portmaster -o graphics/poppler-glib poppler-gtk-

Re: How to run massive portmaster update without repeated interruptions? : correction

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
On 27 October 2012 12:21, Thomas Mueller wrote: > When updating many ports with portmaster, I get frequent interruptions with a > prompt such as > ===>>> Delete gstreamer-0.10.35.tar.bz2? y/n [n] >How do I avoid this inefficiency? I don't see any way to say "yes, and please >don't ask again!"

Re: Another impasse: conflict between poppler-glib and (nonexistent?) poppler-gtk

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Robert Backhaus : > Note in updating: > 2011-11-01 > Affects: users of graphics/poppler-gtk > Author: Koop Mast > Reason: > Poppler was update to 0.18.0, and the gtk slave port was renamed to > match the library it installs. Please run the following command to migrate. > # portmast

lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread ajtiM
Hi! On my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-2, clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523, I have a problem to build LibreOffice 3.5.7.2: Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry! ERROR: error 65280 occured while making /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.7.2/canvas.pr

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 27 October 2012 20:25, ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > On my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-2, clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) > 20120523, I have a problem to build LibreOffice 3.5.7.2: > > Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry! > ERROR: error 65280 occured while making > /usr/ports/editors

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread ajtiM
On Saturday 27 October 2012 05:32:29 Robert Backhaus wrote: > On 27 October 2012 20:25, ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-2, clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) > > 20120523, I have a problem to build LibreOffice 3.5.7.2: > > > > Oh dear - something failed during the b

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 27 October 2012 21:40, ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 27 October 2012 05:32:29 Robert Backhaus wrote: >> On 27 October 2012 20:25, ajtiM wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > On my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-2, clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) >> > 20120523, I have a problem to build LibreOffice 3.5.7.2: >>

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Chris Rees
On 27 Oct 2012 12:57, "Robert Backhaus" wrote: > > On 27 October 2012 21:40, ajtiM wrote: > > On Saturday 27 October 2012 05:32:29 Robert Backhaus wrote: > >> On 27 October 2012 20:25, ajtiM wrote: > >> > Hi! > >> > > >> > On my FreeBSD 9.1 RC-2, clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) >

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread ajtiM
On Saturday 27 October 2012 07:09:07 Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 Oct 2012 12:57, "Robert Backhaus" wrote: > > On 27 October 2012 21:40, ajtiM wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 October 2012 05:32:29 Robert Backhaus wrote: > > >> On 27 October 2012 20:25, ajtiM wrote: > > >> > Hi! > > >> > > > >> > On my

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread ajtiM
On Saturday 27 October 2012 06:57:18 Robert Backhaus wrote: > > clang++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault: 11 (core > dumped) > > that while compiling spritecanvas.cxx Segfaults are often bad > hardware, but can be many other things. Are you sure libreoffice > builds with cla

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 27 October 2012 22:38, ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 27 October 2012 06:57:18 Robert Backhaus wrote: > >> >> clang++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault: 11 (core >> dumped) >> >> that while compiling spritecanvas.cxx Segfaults are often bad >> hardware, but can be many other thi

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Huff
ajtiM writes: > > > clang++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault: 11 (core > > > > dumped) > > > > > > http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa > > > > SIG 11 is almost always bad hardware, I agree with Robert on diagnosis. > > > > Does it fail in the same place every

graphics/gnash: bad dependency www/libxul19

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
I am still trying to update all ports that depend on png, and the newest snag is libxul. Since libxul19 was marked vulnerable, that stopped a previous try, and I ran portmaster -o www/libxul libxul and graphics/gnash does not like this because of the lack of file gnash-0.8.10_2 depends on file:

Re: How to run massive portmaster update without repeated interruptions?

2012-10-27 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* Kevin Oberman [2012-10-27 01:44 -0400]: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:26 PM, David J. Weller-Fahy > wrote: > > ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt > > I'm on the DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=Dopt side as the wrong files will get > deleted on occasion. I suggest running 'portmaster --clean-disfiles'. > It is m

Re: How to run massive portmaster update without repeated interruptions?

2012-10-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:27 AM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: > * Kevin Oberman [2012-10-27 01:44 -0400]: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:26 PM, David J. Weller-Fahy >> wrote: >> > ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt >> >> I'm on the DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=Dopt side as the wrong files will get >> deleted on

Re: Index not being built again

2012-10-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 25 Oct 2012 10:47, "Erwin Lansing" wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >>> > On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, "Erwin Lansing" wrote: >>> > > >>> > > O

sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G in ports.conf nonfunctional

2012-10-27 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this line in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf: sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G I thought the new options framework was backwards compatible and ports-mgmt/portconf does

Re: sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G in ports.conf nonfunctional

2012-10-27 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:26:17PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it > does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this > line in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf: > > sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G > > I thou

Re: Taking over maintainership of devel/py-ice, next steps

2012-10-27 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi Michael, Michael Gmelin wrote on 27.10.2012 00:09: If something goes wrong you can also fetch it for a limited amount of time at this URL: http://blog.grem.de/py27-Ice-3.4.2_3.patch.gz Thanks for your help, Michael Just committed with couple of change from mine (see commit message). And

ports-mgmt/portconf with new options framework

2012-10-27 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 10/27/2012 21:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:26:17PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it >> does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this >> line in /usr/local/etc/ports.c

Re: lbreoffice 3.5.7

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Huff
Robert Huff writes: > {Libre, Open)Office takes far longer to build than any of the > ~900 ports I have installed on this system. If there's anything > that takes longer, I am unaware of it. > I will try this and report back. Build successful. Installation sucessful

Re: Taking over maintainership of devel/py-ice, next steps

2012-10-27 Thread Michael Gmelin
On 27 Oct 2012, at 22:01, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Gmelin wrote on 27.10.2012 00:09: >> If something goes wrong you can also fetch it for a limited amount of >> time at this URL: >> >> http://blog.grem.de/py27-Ice-3.4.2_3.patch.gz >> >> Thanks for your help, >> Mi

Re: graphics/gnash: bad dependency www/libxul19

2012-10-27 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 27 October 2012 23:34, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I am still trying to update all ports that depend on png, and the newest snag > is libxul. > > Since libxul19 was marked vulnerable, that stopped a previous try, and I ran > portmaster -o www/libxul libxul > and graphics/gnash does not like this b

Re: How to run massive portmaster update without repeated interruptions?

2012-10-27 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* Kevin Oberman [2012-10-27 12:43 -0400]: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:27 AM, David J. Weller-Fahy > wrote: > > I assume one would notice by having distfiles downloaded again the > > next time you needed to build the software, right? > > More important to me is that distfiles will occasionally b