I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
vulnerabilities and is EOL
How should I do.
Delete it from my machine? How about flash support? Not very important
but nice to have ;-)
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:44:09 +0200
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
>
>
>
> The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired:
> has vulnerabilities and is EOL
But it will work, if you have it installed
>
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen :
>
> I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
>
It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
>
>
> The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
> vulnerabilities and is EOL
>
>
> How should I do.
>
> De
2012-08-27 09:55, Sergey V. Dyatko skrev:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:44:09 +0200
Leslie Jensen wrote:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired:
has vulnerabilities and is EOL
But it will work
2012-08-27 09:55, René Ladan skrev:
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen :
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
vulnerabilities and is EOL
--
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen :
>
>
> 2012-08-27 09:55, René Ladan skrev:
>>
>> 2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen :
>>>
>>>
>>> I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
>>>
>> It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port h
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:52:01AM +0700, Alexander Wolf wrote:
> Today has been released Stellarium 0.11.4 with improvements for *BSD systems.
>
> http://astro.uni-altai.ru/~aw/patches/FreeBSD-stellarium.patch
Thanks for the patch (albeit it's incomplete: missing distinfo and
pkg-plist changes,
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
2012/8/26 Baptiste Daroussin :
> I received more feedback about keep pkg and changing it to
> pkg-bootstrap, so what should I do, changing it because you are asking for it?
So, just a "me too" for renaming pkg, for consistency. I don't mind
the new name...
--
Olivier Smedts
Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > The old Makefile headers, ala:
> >=20
> > # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
> > # Date created: 27 January 2012
> > # Whom: dougb
> > #
> >
On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> The old Makefile headers, ala:
>>> =20
>>> # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
>>> # Date created: 27 January 2012
>>> # Who
On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
> from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
> holiday, & I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, & didnt want to
> invoke send-pr, I fell back succesful
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Bryan Drewery
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:02:15 -0500
> Message-id: <503b6fd7.4060...@shatow.net>
Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Brooks Davis wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wro
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
#3 0x005e710f in gdb_init ()
#4 0x00549086 in relocate_gdb_directory
Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
> > from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
> > holiday, & I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, & didnt want to
> > invoke s
on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
> ...
> #0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
> #1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
> #2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
> #3 0x005e710
I'm waiting someone commit this:
ports/171109
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
>> ...
>> #0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
>> #1 0x00476bbd
on 27/08/2012 17:44 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
>> ...
>> #0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
>> #1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
>> #2 0x000
on 27/08/2012 17:48 Luca Pizzamiglio said the following:
> I'm waiting someone commit this:
>
> ports/171109
Great, thanks!
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
>>
on 27/08/2012 17:51 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 27/08/2012 17:48 Luca Pizzamiglio said the following:
>> I'm waiting someone commit this:
>>
>> ports/171109
>
> Great, thanks!
BTW, you might want to fix another issue along the way: make reinstall fails
because of an existing symlink. -
On 08/27/12 16:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
#3 0x005e710f in gdb_init ()
#4 0x0
Hi,
Hans : have you tried the patch included here ports/171109?
Andriy: thanks for the report, I create a patch for that as soon as I can!
Regards,
Luca
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> On 08/27/12 16:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segme
On 08/27/12 17:06, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
Hi,
Hans : have you tried the patch included here ports/171109?
With that patch gdb75 comes back to life again on amd64, and stops
spewing weird messages while starting up on both amd64 and i386. If I
stumble over more issues I will let you know. Tha
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
===> Deinstalling for math/lapack
===> Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
The following packages will be deinstalled:
lapack-3.4.0_2
The deinstallation will fre
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Wal Mart is looking for Secret ~Shoppers to help us checkout our stores in
your area and we will pay you.
Please visit our page to
SignUp
..
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
Gerald,
It seems that if lang/gcc46 is installed, and then you attempt to update
it, lang/gcc shows up in the output of build-depends-list,
run-depends-list, or perhaps both. If lang/gcc46 is not installed
already, this doesn't happen.
This would seem to be an error in the bsd.gcc.mk logic, or pe
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:35:14PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> It seems that if lang/gcc46 is installed, and then you attempt to update
> it, lang/gcc shows up in the output of build-depends-list,
> run-depends-list, or perhaps both. If lang/gcc46 is not installed
> already, this doesn
On 8/27/2012 12:44 PM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> FWIW, on the machine on which I'm writing this note, I successfully
> performed an:
>
> Upgrade of gcc-4.6.4.20120608 to gcc-4.6.4.20120817
>
> yesterday without incident (using portmaster).
Do you have lang/gcc installed, or lang/gcc46?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:46:27PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> Do you have lang/gcc installed, or lang/gcc46?
>
> pkg_info -qo gcc-4.6\*
albert(8.3-S)[5] pkg_info -qo gcc-4.6\*
lang/gcc46
albert(8.3-S)[6]
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.or
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:03:46PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
> deinstalled:
>
> # cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
> # make deinstall
> ===> Deinstalling for math/lapack
> ===> Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
> The following pack
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
> PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
> deinstalled:
>
> # cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
> # make deinstall
> ===> Deinstalling for math/lapack
> ===> Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
> The following packages will be deinstal
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
> > deinstalled:
> >
> > # cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
> > # make deinstall
> > ===> Deinstalling for math/lapack
> >
On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
>>> PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
>>> deinstalled:
>>>
>>> # cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
>>> # make dein
I elected to do a complete re-install of an 8.3 server, and kde4 fails
because of dependencies:
x11/kde4 depends on:
misc/kdeedu4 which depends on:
japanese/kiten WHICH FAILS
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> >> On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >>> PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
> kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can use OPTIONS to deselect the dependencies. What's
the problem, anyway? Can you paste a log? We're interested
On 2012-08-27 23:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
> PKG_NG seems to have int
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:20:16AM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-08-27 23:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> >> On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> O
this is on a fresh install of 8.3, and AFTER running a csup
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 3:16 PM:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> => kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo.
> => Either /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo is out of date, or
> => kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly.
> *** Error code 1
Can you show the output of `make -C /u
On 27 August 2012 10:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
> No,
> - eg, If MAINTAINER of hylafax had resigned I would have resumed maintenance.
This is unrelated to you being the original contributor. It is you,
thankfully, being interested in the port. :)
> - Creators of others por
On 08/26/12 17:02, Doug Barton wrote:
> The old Makefile headers, ala:
>
> # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
> # Date created: 27 January 2012
> # Whom: dougb
> #
> # $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487 2012-07-24 19:23
43 matches
Mail list logo
