Hi!
I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update
LibreOffice
3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build
LibreOffice 3.5.4. Do I need this update? Is it not possible anymore to use
Clang 3.0?
Th
On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release
and it shows me to update LibreOffice
> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
> FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build
> LibreOffice 3.5.4. Do I need this update? Is it not po
can be maintainer timeout for port patch submissions implemented for
people which are FREEBSD commiters? I see no reason why they should be
exception from standard port processing. If they do not care about their
ports, they should not have power to obstruct other people work.
I have really lo
On 14 July 2012 15:05, Radim Kolar wrote:
> can be maintainer timeout for port patch submissions implemented for people
> which are FREEBSD commiters? I see no reason why they should be exception
> from standard port processing. If they do not care about their ports, they
> should not have power t
On 14 July 2012 07:51, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 14 July 2012 15:05, Radim Kolar wrote:
>> can be maintainer timeout for port patch submissions implemented for people
>> which are FREEBSD commiters? I see no reason why they should be exception
>> from standard port processing. If they do not care ab
Chris Rees wrote:
> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets
automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a committer, it is
not automatically unassigned if the person is missing for a few
months,
On 14 July 2012 16:24, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
>
> One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets
> automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a committer, it is
> not automaticall
No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
can i get this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165939
unassigned from secteam and processed it as normal freebsd bug? Secteam
does not seems to be interested enough and it is single line fix.
_
On 14 July 2012 17:07, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
>>> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
>
> can i get this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165939
> unassigned from secteam and processed it as normal freebsd bug? Secteam does
> not seems to be interested
Chris Rees wrote:
>> Is automatic unassignment possible?
>
> Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable.
Why?
> You can feel free to
> bring it up here if you think that's happened.
I will, if it'll happen to me. In the mean while here's an
incomplete list of PRs that where (auto)assigned to
On 14 July 2012 17:34, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>>> Is automatic unassignment possible?
>>
>> Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable.
>
> Why?
>
>> You can feel free to
>> bring it up here if you think that's happened.
>
> I will, if it'll happen to me. In the mean while he
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release
and it shows me to update LibreOffice
3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build
LibreOffice 3.5
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:51:23PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 14 July 2012 15:05, Radim Kolar wrote:
> > can be maintainer timeout for port patch submissions implemented for people
> > which are FREEBSD commiters? I see no reason why they should be exception
> > from standard port processing. I
Oh yeah! Holy secteam@ proves to have ~5 years timeout.
5 years is nothing special man. I got one too!
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/109272
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On Saturday 14 July 2012 14:18:42 Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0
> > Release and it shows me to update LibreOffice
> >
> >> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
> >> FreeBSD 9.0
On 14 July 2012 12:42, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
>> Oh yeah! Holy secteam@ proves to have ~5 years timeout.
>
>
> 5 years is nothing special man. I got one too!
none of you beat http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/1375.
sometimes PRs are hard, and sometimes PRs slip through the cracks.
We
On 2012-07-14 21:18, Warren Block wrote:> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric
wrote:
>> On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:
> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update
> LibreOffice
>>> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
>>> FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0
..I've put a shar here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vdr-ports-1.7.29-001.shar
Unshar in /usr/ports , stop vdr, then run:
portmaster vdr-plugins
If that succeeded (which it should, this update was rather painless)
you can restart vdr.
Enjoy, :)
Juergen
PS: If al
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> > What I want to know is this new pkg system going to remove the
> requirement
> > of having the complete ports tree on my system?
> >
> > What I am looking for in an port system, is to install a
I think when I did a make reinstall the port wrote over my database. Could
you check to ensure it doesn't do that for future updates I may run. Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To u
Lev Serebryakov writes:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I've installed "darktable" port, which brings up "gamin" (configured
> with libinotify), and now when I run darktable gam_Server consumes
> 100% of my CPU (one core).
>
> ktrace shows that it spins in tight loop with kevent() call, which
> a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jonah Meissner wrote:
> I think when I did a make reinstall the port wrote over my database. Could
> you check to ensure it doesn't do that for future updates I may run.
> Thanks.
>
What do you mean by "wrote over your database"? Did it write over this
entry in th
On 07/13/2012 13:22, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote on 27.05.2012 13:33:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I maintain net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar*, and net-p2p/qbittorrent29.
>> Ever since the update I've noticed that my libtorrent-rasterbar
>> applications have problems with the new boost version.
On 07/13/2012 03:39, Warren Block wrote:
> With the patch and base clang/llvm on two amd64 systems here,
> 'libreoffice --calc' shows the startup screen, then exits with status
> 139. No core dump or anything, it just quits. Other modules all seem
> to work.
I previously had this problem, but ca
24 matches
Mail list logo
