Oleg Moskalenko writes:
> Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in a form
> "+POS1 -POS2". It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did not implement it
> in the new BSD sort. I can add it, if necessary.
If anyone asked for my opinion, I'd say that I'd prefer to se
Hi!
> I'll give it a try.
I prepared a patch, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
hints on what's wrong.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
__
Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin
configuration,
I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even
put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a feature that
should be in the base. Having 2 symlinks just seems like overkill.
IMO nether symli
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Messenger
wrote:
> I get a build failure on amd64:
>
> -
> /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_'
> can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> lapi.o: could not read symb
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:33:06AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Oleg Moskalenko writes:
> >
> > Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in
> > a form "+POS1 -POS2". It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did
> > not implement it in the new BSD sort. I can add it, if
See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-December/071814.html
--
Michel Talon
ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On 3/18/2012 18:01, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I'll give it a try.
>
> I prepared a patch, see
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
>
> It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
> hints on what's wrong.
You replaced in Makefile:
PORTDOCS= COPYING
On 18 Mar 2012 19:24, "Mel Flynn" wrote:
>
> On 3/18/2012 18:01, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I'll give it a try.
> >
> > I prepared a patch, see
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
> >
> > It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
> > hints on wh
I guess that using a not-backward-compatible syntax would make it difficult for
some users to accept.
We are going to have a newer 1.7 build soon that supports older pre-POSIX
syntax (among other improvements).
It is "guarded" by #ifdef. If Gabor decides to eliminate this backward
compatibili
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the
> OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify.
> The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
> showed i
Hi!
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
> > It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
> > hints on what's wrong.
> You replaced in Makefile:
> PORTDOCS= COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
> win-memleak.txt
>
> With in pkg-plist:
> share
Thanks!
I added the link to the porting Wiki.
If someone else is following the instructions and downloading it,
it's a good idea to avoid downloading the "historic" dir: it's already
pretty big without getting the older versions ;-).
cheers,
Pedro.
On 03/18/12 13:23, Michel Talon wrote:
See
On 2012.03.14. 22:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
determine which was used.
'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at
its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right
one.
I prefer simpli
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:17:53PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
>
> > > It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
> > > hints on what's wrong.
> > You replaced in Makefile:
> > PORTDOCS= COPYING CREDITS Chang
> Anyway I think that the steps of launching a new port/port usage/port
> deprecation is necessary for this exact reason. The other way would be to
> freeze all the tree from time to time (i.e. several months) and ask projects
> maintainers/developers to stick to each freeze. FreeBSD system do t
15 matches
Mail list logo