> Anyway I think that the steps of launching a new port/port usage/port > deprecation is necessary for this exact reason. The other way would be to > freeze all the tree from time to time (i.e. several months) and ask projects > maintainers/developers to stick to each freeze. FreeBSD system do that, but > in userland it is imho not possible due to the big amount of ports available, > dependencies, conflicts, etc. >
I think the best thing to actually do lang/php53 who need it. And to maintain it. Just need to make this port at one time with the update php5 to version 5.4 and is described in UPDATING -- Svyatoslav _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
