Hi all,
Our openssh-portable port hasn't been updated to 5.9p1, so I took advantage
of a free evening to see if I could update it. Unfortunately Simon
Wilkinson's GSSAPI patch no longer applies, as it hasn't been updated since
OpenSSH 5.8. It has been superceeded by the NCSA illinois.edu GSI pa
alexus wrote:
> slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely
> used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through
> mailing lists and other ways
Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you
want custom packages set up your own
Hi!
I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice
maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has
many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports.
Thank.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
__
On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice
> maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has
> many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports.
>
> Thank.
>
> Mitja
>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
> On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice
> > maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and
> > has
> > many improv
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 07:23:37 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 13/03/2012 13:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> >
> > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c
> > Set A
On 14/03/2012 12:35, David Southwell wrote:
> Does that not produce problems with postfix?
> How do we retain mailwrapper functionality?
When you install postfix, it sets up /etc/mail/mailer.conf so that it
pipes any new mail into postfix. Or, at least, it tells you what to put
in that file to ac
On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
>
> qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am
> Getting the following error:
>
> set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o
> set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c
> Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD =
> checking for sendmail program... ER
Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ppc->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: nwhitehorn
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:23:30 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reassign to responsible party.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058
__
Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:24:58 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Its freebsd-ports-bugs. Thanks.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058
lang/perl5.8 has been EOL since ~12/16/2008
lang/perl5.10 has been EOL since ~08/23/2009
lang/perl5.12 is currently in Maint mode (our current default)
lang/perl5.14(.2) is currently GA
lang/perl5.15 is currently Devel and in the works with a -exp run
requested
lang/perl5.8 and la
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> >
> > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c
> > Set AR_FL
All,
1 month after the EOL lang/perl* cleanup, we will change the default
PERL_VERSION from lang/perl5.12 to lang/perl5.14 which should before
October 1, 2012. lang/perl5.12 will remain in the tree as long as it is
supported upstream + our standard deprecation cycle.
Please plan accordingly.
-
On 3/14/2012 14:53, David Southwell wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
>> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
>>> qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
>>> I am Getting the following error:
>>>
>>> set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o
>>
Hi Folks,
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to
modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
showed interest in continuing this version
and he has made a very goo
hey, nothing wrong with jumping up and down :))
I'm not looking for a custom package. What I am looking (and a lot of
other users out there) is:
mod_php & php-fpm as a separate mainstream package without using /usr/ports
mod_php is a must, right now the only way to reach that functionality
is to u
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> >
> > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c
> > Set AR_FL
Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher
than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,
which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.
I think this would be a great ben
On 3/14/12 1:46 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get
higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were
Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issu
If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hello Cy,
On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
[snip]
> What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI
> server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which
> includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with
On 3/14/2012 20:00, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
> x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
> Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?
fc-list should show them all (part of fontconfig).
--
Mel
___
freebs
On 3/14/2012 17:27, David Southwell wrote:
> That worked
It worked to confirm my suspicions. I've filed a proper fix in:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166108
--
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Robert Huff writes:
>
> If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
> x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
> Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?
There is: fc-list, part of fontconfig.
Robert Huff
___
In message <4f60ef46.2040...@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes:
> Hello Cy,
>
> On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> > patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI
> > server key exchange, create a new port
On 14 March 2012 08:59, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the
> OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify.
> The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
> showed interest in continuing
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:57:58 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
> > On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just
> > > OpenOffice maintained? I used on my w
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:59:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>
> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch
> since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was
> hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg
> Moskalenko showed int
Be sure to let people know that it is for powerpc64 only. The
hypervisor was not present in powerpc 32bit cpus.
On 3/14/12, scheid...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell
>
On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
> programs using some magic alias program.
>
> So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
> determine which was used.
>
> 'sort' would then be
This is true, debians do the symlinks trick.
In Ubuntu :
/usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
/etc/alternatives/java - >/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java
Oleg
From: Jonathan Anderson [mailto:jonathan.ander...@cl.cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:14 PM
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: G
I must be thinking of our mailer trick then?
I know i've seen it somewhere before.
Alternatives sounds fun though?
ADrian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
I am running 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #89 r229960M: Mon Mar 12
05:11:09 CST 2012 amd64. I am not a big skype user but the last couple of
weeks it hasn't worked and I've actually enjoyed the silence;) but someday
I need to get it going.
World and all ports are up to date and the skype config
33 matches
Mail list logo
