Hi *, now I'm testing x11-toolkits/fltk for math/octave port.
sorry for delay.
thanks
From: Pietro Cerutti
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:53:31 +0200
> On 2011-Sep-06, 08:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> On 09/06/2011 07:32 AM, Pietro
Hi list,
As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to
update. Today, if you just need one airplane from flightgear-aircrafts,
you would have to download 350+ airplanes and more than 2 GB of data,
whic
On 2011-Sep-22, 16:30, Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Hi *, now I'm testing x11-toolkits/fltk for math/octave port.
> sorry for delay.
I'm a bit behind schedule too, I'll probably get to it only next week!
Happy testing ;)
> thanks
>
> From: Pietro Cerutti
> Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolk
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> > This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
>> > I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
>> > archives of all four from:
>> >
>> >http://www.infraca
On 22 Sep 2011 09:11, "Ganael LAPLANCHE"
wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
> useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to
> update. Today, if you just need one airplane from flightgear-aircrafts,
> you would ha
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:03:38AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2011 09:11, "Ganael LAPLANCHE"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
> > useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to
> > update. To
On 22.09.2011 10:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
archives of all four from:
Hi Chris,
I see; these things always might happen.
Can you tell me where I can find a summary of issues that come with this
version? I then can check whether this might affect my system or not.
For the time being I will stick to 1.9.
Thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Chris Rees:
Unfortunately, although
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:07:40 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Chris, Anton,
Thanks for your feedback.
> > 4) add-on ports?
>
> yes, this seems to be the case with latex, works fine.
I am not sure to understand what you mean exactly. Could you be more
precise ?
--
Ganael LAPLANCHE
http://www.m
On 22/09/2011 10:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
>> One question: committers -- would you prefer this as a .shar for a new
>> www/rt40 port, or as a diff against www/rt38 and repo-copy to www/rt40?
>>
>
> Please send it as a diff against rt38, as we'll do a repo copy.
>
Done. http://www.freebsd.org/c
Hiya
Im actually trying to install the port terminator, but the dependacy port it
tripping over itself.
Would anyone know how I can go about fixing this?
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
[root@bclark-laptop /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-vte]# make install clean
===> Building for py27-vte-0.26.2
CC
>From Chris Rees :
> Well... you lose avahi, which is a zeroconf implementation, but you're
> probably just better off with samba.
> The BROKEN message references http://www.avahi.org/ticket/303 -- look
> there for more information on why it's marked as such.
>Chris
I found that avahi bug ticke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/22/11 5:28 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:07:40 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
>
> Chris, Anton,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>>> 4) add-on ports?
>>
>> yes, this seems to be the case with latex, works fine.
>
> I am
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:52:56 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
Hi Greg,
> [...]
> If you can break the flightgear airplanes (or subsets of
> airplanes) into a number of add-on ports, that would be one
> way to avoid the huge download problem, as well as an
> excessive number of OPTIONS in the base port
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:35:48PM +0200, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:43:47 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> > print/teTeX is quite old. However, it's a critical
> > port for many people, and there is no easy update
> > or replacement (tex-live work is ongoin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/22/11 9:13 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:52:56 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
>
> Hi Greg,
>
>> [...]
>> If you can break the flightgear airplanes (or subsets of
>> airplanes) into a number of add-on ports, that would be one
>
On 9/22/2011 9:38 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
I don't use flightgear, so others would have a better opinion than me
about how to partition the airplane ports. Is there a forum on the
upstream distro site where you could ask?
You can also break them by first letter of the distfile names, combining
w
Hi gahr,
your fltk update seems to be ok to me (math/octave).
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Pietro Cerutti
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:32:02 +0200
> On 2011-Sep-22, 16:30, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi *, now I'm testing x11-toolkits/fltk for m
2011/9/22 Maho NAKATA :
> Hi gahr,
>
> your fltk update seems to be ok to me (math/octave).
That's a good news.
wen
>
> thanks
> Nakata Maho
>
> From: Pietro Cerutti
> Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:32:02 +0200
>
>> On 2011-Sep-22, 16:3
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
1) providing only a subset of available airplanes (i.e. *not* every
single airplane available on the FTP servers). This would be nice, but
requires to set up a list of the best planes to include (top 30 best
planes ?), and that list may not be the one
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:57:58AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> I don't use this program either, but my first reaction was to break
> it into broad categories.
> For example:
>
> aircraft-required
> aircraft-25-most-popular
> aircraft-civilian-prop
> air
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47 AM, wrote:
>> Hey everyone, I maintain devel/doxygen (sorry I didn't add my 2 cents
>> earlier, I've been a bit busy) and was looking at this particular thread. I
>> know someone filed a PR regarding the circular dependency, stating that it
>> might be best to split
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:38:33 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
> You can also break them by first letter of the distfile names,
> combining where appropriate.
> [...]
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:58 -0400, Robert Huff wrote
> my first reaction was to break it into broad categories.
> For example:
>
> air
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:09:57 -0500
> From: Scot Hetzel
> Subject: Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?
> To: tho...@freebsd.org, muel...@freebsd.org
> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47 AM, wrote:
Mainly features introduced by external patches should be tested.
They work for me, but maybe someone will find some regressions.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Hi,
when trying to "make" print/acroreadwrapper I receive a
===> acroreadwrapper-0.0.20110920 requires kernel source to
be installed.
*** Error code 1
My kernel sources are installed - do we have some kind of typo there?
Greetings
Peter
--
Peter Ul
Kruppa, Peter Ulrich wrote on 23.09.2011 09:52:
Hi,
when trying to "make" print/acroreadwrapper I receive a
===> acroreadwrapper-0.0.20110920 requires kernel source to
be installed.
*** Error code 1
My kernel sources are installed - do we have some kind of typo there?
Greetings
Peter
Hi.
27 matches
Mail list logo
