On 22 Sep 2011 09:11, "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <ganael.laplan...@martymac.org> wrote: > > Hi list, > > As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be > useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to > update. Today, if you just need one airplane from flightgear-aircrafts, > you would have to download 350+ airplanes and more than 2 GB of data, > which makes no sense at all. We have to get rid of that. > > I am thinking of two options : > > 1) providing only a subset of available airplanes (i.e. *not* every > single airplane available on the FTP servers). This would be nice, but > requires to set up a list of the best planes to include (top 30 best > planes ?), and that list may not be the one every single user would have > established. > > 2) removing the port and consider users have to install additional > planes *manually*. After all, those airplanes are only addons ; limiting > the ports to flightgear + flightgear-data, which already ship with > several airplanes, does not seem crazy to me. > > A third option would have been to provide the full list of available > airplanes but only select a few of them through OPTIONS, but I'd like to > avoid going this way : this will not simplify the port at all, it will > only make it harder to maintain as the OPTIONS list will be huge, and > (maybe ?) pointless for the end-user. > > Flightgear users, I would go for option 2), but what do *you* think ? >
4) add-on ports? Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
