Quoting Mark Linimon (from Mon, 20 Jun 2011
18:21:26 -0500):
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A permanent URL
Am 21.06.2011 01:00, schrieb Koop Mast:
> Hey, could you try this patch? I try the USE_CSTD=gnu89 trick if I get
> symbol troubles when linking. This is because clang defaults to gnu99
> while gcc still defaults to gnu89. From what I remember the inline
> keyword has different meanings between the
Hi everyone,
Over the past few weeks, I've been working on a Likewise-open [1] port and am
starting to get something useable.
Technically speaking, the port builds fine on x86 and amd64 platforms (gcc-
only ATM) and is able to use libraries from the ports tree instead of the ones
bundled in the
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:37:53 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
Hi!
Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC
setting
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Mark Linimon (from Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:21:26
> -0500):
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>>
>>> Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
>>> be
>>> seen here:
Roman Divacky ha scritto:
It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports
you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
--
Alex Dupre
___
freeb
Am 21.06.2011 12:15, schrieb Alex Dupre:
> Roman Divacky ha scritto:
>> It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of
>> the ports
>> you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
>
> I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
>
Do somethin
Matthias Andree ha scritto:
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
Do something similar to this:
Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current ready
for testing, this is the reason of my question :-)
--
Alex Dupre
Am 21.06.2011 12:29, schrieb Alex Dupre:
> Matthias Andree ha scritto:
>>> I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
>>
>> Do something similar to this:
>
> Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current ready
> for testing, this is the reason of my ques
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:18 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 21.06.2011 12:29, schrieb Alex Dupre:
Matthias Andree ha scritto:
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test
them?
Do something similar to this:
Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current
Am 21.06.2011 12:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
> Just be aware that stable clang has some issue with the stable binutils,
> to fix this make sure to use binutils from ports.
>
> To be able to test on stable:
> export CC=clang
> export CXX=clang++
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:${PATH} make -C myport
> t
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:31:44 +0200
Simon Olofsson wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> a nice tool to test your ports before submitting them is
> ports-mgmt/porttools:
> Just run `port test` and it'll run portlint and try to build you port
> etc. You can then submit your port with `port submit`. Read the
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
===> Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed
install -o root -g wheel -m 555
/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh /usr/local/bin/ksh93
install:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
>
> ===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
> ===> Generating temporary packing list
> ===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed
> install -o root -g wheel -m 555
> /usr
On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
===>Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed
install -o
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
> >>
> >> ===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
> >> ===>Gener
Hi,
Does anyone know if there will ever be a wine64 port?
Thanks
Bruce
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:03:48 -0500, Bruce Meier
wrote:
Does anyone know if there will ever be a wine64 port?
The guy working on it is posting packages here:
http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64
Feel free to install them -- they work very well.
Regards,
Mark
__
Thank you very much for the info. I will give it a try.
Bruce
Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:03:48 -0500, Bruce Meier
wrote:
Does anyone know if there will ever be a wine64 port?
The guy working on it is posting packages here:
http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64
Feel free t
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:33:14AM +0400, Ilya A. Arkhipov wrote:
> Ok i rewrite patch and do with argument, and write patch to portlint ;)
Wow, if you could write a patch to portlint that is would correctly suggest
that MAINTAINER/COMMENT/LICENSE should be grouped together, and FOO_DEPENDS
would
20 matches
Mail list logo
