Re: CFT: net-im/openfire 3.7.0

2011-03-22 Thread Pietro Cerutti
Hi all, openfire-3.7.0 is in ports. Best Regards, On 2011-Mar-14, 12:25, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a patch ready to upgrade net-im/openfire to 3.7.0, here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/openfire-3.7.0.diff > > I plan to commit this patch later this week and mark as IGNORE

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

2011-03-22 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет: Gritsuk Anton wrote: On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote: It calles itself not loger Release Candidate: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 RC1 doesn't call itself "release candidate" either

Re: xfce 4.8 upgrade errors

2011-03-22 Thread timp
Thank very much! As I see ArchLinux has very good documentation. And what about access to smb shares via thunar? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/xfce-4-8-upgrade-errors-tp3863482p4256954.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

graphics/mesa-demos fails to build

2011-03-22 Thread Chris
Hello, I'm seeing this when I try to build from ports: /var/tmp//ccNBgj1B.o(.text+0x1c5): In function `main': : undefined reference to `glXCreateGLXPixmapMESA' gmake[2]: *** [glxpixmap] Error 1 gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-de

Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes

2011-03-22 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Henk van Oers píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 23:29 +0100: > From: Pav Lucistnik > > Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100: > [...] > >> Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on > >> the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW, > >> h

KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

2011-03-22 Thread John Baldwin
At work we have folks use FreeBSD desktops. To do this we install pre-package versions of both KDE and GNOME (and a few other window managers) onto our desktop build machine so that users can choose which environment they want. This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 p

Re: KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

2011-03-22 Thread Alex Dupre
John Baldwin ha scritto: This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely, some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other package that KDE depends on wants to use libiodbc.

Re: KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

2011-03-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote: > John Baldwin ha scritto: > > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages > > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely, > > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODB

Re: KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

2011-03-22 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
John Baldwin writes: > On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote: >> Even if it could be simpler (is it?), I think unixODBC is a more common >> choice these days, so changing the KDE ports could be better. >> >> A few stats: >> - ports supporting both unixODBC and iODBC: 17 >> - po

Re: KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

2011-03-22 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > John Baldwin ha scritto: > > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages > > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely, > > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other > > package that KDE depends on w