Hi all,
openfire-3.7.0 is in ports.
Best Regards,
On 2011-Mar-14, 12:25, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a patch ready to upgrade net-im/openfire to 3.7.0, here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/openfire-3.7.0.diff
>
> I plan to commit this patch later this week and mark as IGNORE
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself "release candidate" either
Thank very much!
As I see ArchLinux has very good documentation.
And what about access to smb shares via thunar?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/xfce-4-8-upgrade-errors-tp3863482p4256954.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hello,
I'm seeing this when I try to build from ports:
/var/tmp//ccNBgj1B.o(.text+0x1c5): In function `main':
: undefined reference to `glXCreateGLXPixmapMESA'
gmake[2]: *** [glxpixmap] Error 1
gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-de
Henk van Oers píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 23:29 +0100:
> From: Pav Lucistnik
>
> Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
> [...]
> >> Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
> >> the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW,
> >> h
At work we have folks use FreeBSD desktops. To do this we install pre-package
versions of both KDE and GNOME (and a few other window managers) onto our
desktop build machine so that users can choose which environment they want.
This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 p
John Baldwin ha scritto:
This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
(and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other
package that KDE depends on wants to use libiodbc.
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote:
> John Baldwin ha scritto:
> > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
> > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
> > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODB
John Baldwin writes:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Even if it could be simpler (is it?), I think unixODBC is a more common
>> choice these days, so changing the KDE ports could be better.
>>
>> A few stats:
>> - ports supporting both unixODBC and iODBC: 17
>> - po
Hi!
> John Baldwin ha scritto:
> > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
> > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
> > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other
> > package that KDE depends on w
10 matches
Mail list logo