Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

Thanks all for the testing, sorry I wasn't able to be reactive this WE (because of my ISP). Anyway the git has version been improved to address most of the problem you reported. I'm doing some testing on it but the library path issue should be fixed. The only thing I haven't fixed yet (I guess) i

Current unassigned ports problem reports

(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory?

On Thu, 27.01.2011 at 13:02:30 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Do I need to bump PORTREVISION before I submit the updated port? Is > > that mandatory? > > > > PORTREVISION should only be changed if you need the users of a port to > recompile the port. > Typos and documentation typically don't requir

cmake and Freetype strangeness

Hi all, I'm trying (still) to make a port for projectM. The one I've made works fine on my production system, but when I put it on my test system which has no ports installed, it throws a tantrum. I've added the depends: LIB_DEPENDS=ftgl:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/ftgl \ GLEW:${PO

Re: xfce 4.8pre3 preview

Hi, I have question, updates (Terminal, xfce4-panel, xfce4-settings, xfce4-utils, xfce4-wm, xfce4-desktop, and Thunar) of this week-end made by Xfce dev team, will be in the port tree with rest of 4.8 core ? I've send a PR for Midori [1], and I noticed that Mk/bsd.sites.mk is broken, due to mirro

Re: [CFT] KDE SC 4.6.0 for FreeBSD.

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > Hello Internet, > > The FreeBSD KDE Team is happy to let you know that KDE SC 4.6.0 has been > released a few Days ago, and the Release is ready for a public test. Before > you ask, no, we do not want to put KDE 4.6.0 in the ports tree before

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

From: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 > I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a > pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30 > with java) Strange, full build with

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Monday, 31 January 2011: > Thanks all for the testing, sorry I wasn't able to be reactive this WE > (because of my ISP). > > Anyway the git has version been improved to address most of the > problem you reported. I'm doing some testing on it but the library > path issue

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

Hi, Bapt, tinderbox build of libreoffice port has failed. I uploaded the buildlog http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/misc/libreoffice-3.3.0.log.bz2 . it looks 'shells/bash' is not added in the dependency list. Moreover, you may want replace '==' to '=' in configure script. Please

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011/2/1 Maho NAKATA : > From: Baptiste Daroussin > Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final > Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 > >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30 >> wit

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

From: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:35:00 + > I do not use ccache or anything like that. here a full bundle > libraries took about 4 hours for OpenOffice.org. No I don't use it either. > that mean my box is not very op

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011/2/1 Maho NAKATA : > Hi, Bapt, > > tinderbox build of libreoffice port has failed. I uploaded the buildlog > http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/misc/libreoffice-3.3.0.log.bz2 > . > it looks 'shells/bash' is not added in the dependency list. > > Moreover, you may want replace '==

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

From: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:44:34 + > bash is used more deeply, and people are working on removing it. > thanks for your testing, git (http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/) > version has been greatly improved and shou

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

ok I'll test http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/snapshot/ports-master.tar.gz author Baptiste Daroussin 2011-01-31 22:42:54 (UTC) committerBaptiste Daroussin2011-01-31 22:42:54 (UTC) commit 4e9cbb9b2c56efb6179785cafe224968ade4833e (patch) tree eadb4bdc81c68b8

Re: xfce 4.8pre3 preview

Hi Olivier, Olivier Duchateau wrote: Hi, I have question, updates (Terminal, xfce4-panel, xfce4-settings, xfce4-utils, xfce4-wm, xfce4-desktop, and Thunar) of this week-end made by Xfce dev team, will be in the port tree with rest of 4.8 core ? Yes, the 4.8.1 release will be included - I'll

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

Broken > checking whether to enable debugging code... product > checking whether to use git to get the ooo sources... git: not found > /work/a/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4/clone > already set up > checking for rsync... no > configure: error: rsync not found; required f

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

Hi bapt, you may want to add following line. DIST_SUBDIR=libreoffice spamming many distfiles at /usr/ports/distifiles/ might not be a good idea. thanks Nakata Maho From: Maho NAKATA Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:47:46 +0900 (JST)