2010/12/4 Thierry Thomas :
> Le sam 4 déc 10 à 11:58:44 +0100, David DEMELIER
> écrivait :
>> Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
>> As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of
>> ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd
>> created sub directories in the aspell port. I
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:19:21PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
>
> On 30 Nov 2010, at 03:16, jhell wrote:
>
> > Agreed. Soon can be quantified by actual need and of which there is not
> > much need except for larger packages but adding this would just add
> > unneeded complication to the sy
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Venturoli writes:
> Hello.
> I'm having a small, low priority, trouble; more an annoyance in fact.
> Since a while, if I start an X11 emacs from a terminal window, after I
> close emacs, the terminal window won't close with Ctrl-D; I have to
> close the terminal windows by hand.
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
Does somebody success in building x264 on amd64 host? It needs
gcc44, which is marker "BROKEN", and doesn't build in Fortran part,
indeed, but maybe fix known?
Also, why we have `lang/gcc4x' ports without OPTIONS or subports for
fortran, obj-c, java?
--
// Bla
Synopsis: Request for new port: projectM
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: avg
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Dec 5 14:37:50 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reclassify.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152823
The following reply was made to PR ports/152823; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andriy Gapon
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: amd64/152823: Request for new port: projectM
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:36:43 +0200
This is a ports PR, not for amd64 kernel arch
> > Hello,
> >
> >> As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of
> >> ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd
> >> created sub directories in the aspell port. I think this is a really
> >> good idea, it's really easier to find.
> >>
> >> I don't think ge
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:07:51 +0200
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 30.11.2010 04:40, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > You can specify limits during compression, so the question is
> > should we do that so that hosts with N MB of RAM can decompress
> > packages? Do we retain the compression ratio over bzip2
I don't think that you loose your data, as it is stored in the pgsql
database which is not replaced by the package.
Anyhow, it is always good to have a backup.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
> The biggest package that can be produced by a port it's a bit over 10G.
>
Curious - which one?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs
Eitan Adler writes:
> > The biggest package that can be produced by a port it's a bit over 10G.
>
> Curious - which one?
OpenOffice(-3)?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
>>
>> Curious - which one?
>
> OpenOffice(-3)?
He told me on IRC - something in games/
$grep -R "NO_PACKAGE" /usr/ports/games :-)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:41:29 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>
> >> Curious - which one?
> >
> > OpenOffice(-3)?
>
> He told me on IRC - something in games/
>
> $grep -R "NO_PACKAGE" /usr/ports/games :-)
Hum, looks like either they got smaller or QAT doesn't have all the
games packages buil
05.12.2010 18:03, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
And those ones are all empty at start. So say, if you are compressing
something really huge trying to use 4G of memory you end using that
much memory between 2G - 3G of source data. And we will need 512MB to
decompress that hunk of data.
Are the packages
Quoth Lev Serebryakov on Sunday, 05 December 2010:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> Does somebody success in building x264 on amd64 host? It needs
> gcc44, which is marker "BROKEN", and doesn't build in Fortran part,
> indeed, but maybe fix known?
>
> Also, why we have `lang/gcc4x' ports
Hello, Chip.
You wrote 5 декабря 2010 г., 20:58:23:
> I built x264 fine on amd64, and I do not have gcc44 installed. My gcc -v
> reports:
It is optional, and installing gcc46 before (by hands) helps.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebs
Andrea Venturoli 쓰시길:
> Hello.
> I'm having a small, low priority, trouble; more an annoyance in fact.
>
> Since a while, if I start an X11 emacs from a terminal window, after I
> close emacs, the terminal window won't close with Ctrl-D; I have to
> close the terminal windows by hand.
>
> With th
Dear FreeBSD ports administrator(s),
I recently installed the FreeBSD port 'sql-ledger-2.8.23' when i came
across this article:
*http://tinyurl.com/2v6g94f*
Can you please comment on the security flaws that where found in this
port? Are these vulnerabilities also relevant to version 2.8.23?
On 5 December 2010 17:05, L. Derksen wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD ports administrator(s),
>
>
> I recently installed the FreeBSD port 'sql-ledger-2.8.23' when i came across
> this article:
>
> *http://tinyurl.com/2v6g94f*
>
> Can you please comment on the security flaws that where found in this port?
> A
On 12/05/10 15:18, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
How're you starting X server ?
Through KDM.
And with which version are you seeing this behaviour ?
You mean:
%pkg_info|grep emacs
emacs-23.2_4,2 GNU editing macros
?
And are you running GNOME, KDE, or any desktop environment ?
KDE.
I
On 30.11.2010 21:01, Piotr Byliński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to know when will otrs-3
> be available in freebsd ports ?
Committed.
--
Sergey Skvortsov
mailto: s...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
Andrea Venturoli writes:
> On 12/05/10 15:18, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
>> How're you starting X server ?
> Through KDM.
>> And with which version are you seeing this behaviour ?
> You mean:
> %pkg_info|grep emacs
> emacs-23.2_4,2 GNU editing macros
> ?
I tried that version as well, but I wa
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I noticed a line in bsd.port.mk "Kludge for pre-3.0 systems"
>
> # Kludge for pre-3.0 ystems
> MACHINE_ARCH?= i386
>
> According to cvs blame asami@ added both lines in revision 1.306 in 1999
>
> Furthermore in bsd.port.mk it says ports sh
Eek - wrong link:
https://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/remove-machine-arch.patch
is the patch I meant.
> Here is a completely untested patch that makes the changes above.
> http://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/remove-2004-hack.patch
> Comments on both the patch and my questions are appreciated.
>
>
> -
Hi,
I was wondering why vpopmail support is disabled in this port. I just
tested it on 8-STABLE. It compiles and runs just fine, although I did
have to comment out the extra arguments in dovecot's example
configuration file (auth-vpopmail.conf.ext) because I'm using neither
Maildir++ nor quotas:
25 matches
Mail list logo
