New virtual category proposal: enlightenment

2010-09-10 Thread Grzegorz Blach
Hi, I'm working on enlightenment 0.17 ports at: http://dev.roorback.net/enlight-ports and I wanna have this ports in one single category called 'enlightenment', just like afterstep, gnome, kde, windowmaker. Now I have abount 90 ports in tree, and there are next 5 ports from enlightenment 0.1

x11-toolkits/linux-pango disable vulnerabilities

2010-09-10 Thread David Southwell
Hi There have been a number of postings by others in regard to pango but no useful responses except jhell whos suggested compiling using make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes install clean My experience of this approach is: dns1# make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes install clean ===> linux-pan

Re: x11-toolkits/linux-pango disable vulnerabilities

2010-09-10 Thread David Southwell
> Hi > > There have been a number of postings by others in regard to pango but no > useful responses except jhell whos suggested compiling > using > > make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes install clean > > My experience of this approach is: > > dns1# make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes install cl

Re: x11-toolkits/linux-pango disable vulnerabilities

2010-09-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:14:55AM +0100, David Southwell wrote: > There have been a number of postings by others in regard to pango but no > useful responses except jhell whos suggested compiling > using > > make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes install clean This is incorrect syntax. The comma

Re: New virtual category proposal: enlightenment

2010-09-10 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:14:23 +0200 Grzegorz Blach wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on enlightenment 0.17 ports at: > http://dev.roorback.net/enlight-ports > and I wanna have this ports in one single category called > 'enlightenment', > just like afterstep, gnome, kde, windowmaker. > > Now I have

Re: New virtual category proposal: enlightenment

2010-09-10 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 10/09/2010 09:14, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > I'm working on enlightenment 0.17 ports at: Someone is working on e17 for FreeBSD?! And I was thinking I'd have to change the WM, soon. Thank you so much! -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such

Re: ports/150040: [patch] security/fwtk: plug-gw does not run on 64bit architectures

2010-09-10 Thread pirzyk
Synopsis: [patch] security/fwtk: plug-gw does not run on 64bit architectures Responsible-Changed-From-To: pirzyk->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: pirzyk Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Sep 10 12:14:13 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Please commit patch, I approve. Thanks! http://www.free

Re: ports/150040: [patch] security/fwtk: plug-gw does not run on 64bit architectures

2010-09-10 Thread shaun
Synopsis: [patch] security/fwtk: plug-gw does not run on 64bit architectures Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->shaun Responsible-Changed-By: shaun Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Sep 10 15:21:38 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Grab. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=150040 ___

devel/lua-alien on sparc64 or absence of FFI_SYSV

2010-09-10 Thread Anonymous
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-errorlogs/e.7.20100907084544/lua51-alien-0.5.0.log writes: > building lua51-alien-0.5.0 on netra5.isc.freebsd.org > building for: 7.1-RELEASE-p13 sparc64 > ... > ===> Building for lua51-alien-0.5.0 > cc -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local

portmaster with no run arguments.

2010-09-10 Thread jhell
Hi Doug, Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without any arguments to get the list of "--help". Surprising enough to me it searched for a null port and output the following. ===>>> No valid installed

Re: portmaster with no run arguments.

2010-09-10 Thread jhell
On 09/10/2010 17:35, jhell wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from > portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without > any arguments to get the list of "--help". Surprising enough to me it > searched for a null port and ou

Re: portmaster with no run arguments.

2010-09-10 Thread Jason
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:37:33PM -0400, jhell thus spake: On 09/10/2010 17:35, jhell wrote: Hi Doug, Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without any arguments to get the list of "--help". Surpris

Re: portmaster with no run arguments.

2010-09-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/10/2010 2:35 PM, jhell wrote: Hi Doug, Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without any arguments to get the list of "--help". Surprising enough to me it searched for a null port and output the

Re: portmaster with no run arguments.

2010-09-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/10/2010 5:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 9/10/2010 2:35 PM, jhell wrote: Hi Doug, Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without any arguments to get the list of "--help". Surprising enough to me it search

Port graphics/show conflicts with mail/nmh and japanese/mh

2010-09-10 Thread Greg Peterson
Greetings, The port graphics/show conflicts with mail/nmh (nmh-[0-9]*) and japanese/mh (ja-mh-[0-9]*). The "show" command (/usr/local/bin/show) is in the MH mail handling system, so installing graphics/show after mail/nmh or japanese/mh breaks mail handling for MH users and scripts. - Greg Peter