Erik Trulsson wrote:
> If a port declares that it depends on file/library/whatever "foo"
> from the port "bar", but you have "foo" installed from the port
> "baz" then the dependency check will be fine (since it finds
> "foo") but when the dependency should be registered in the package
> database
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:02:10AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Three weeks old, no activity...
> Could someone act on this? It is simple update, nothing under definition of
> sweeping change...
I've grabbed it and will commit it in the next few days at the latest.
-- WXS
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:06, saige.losli@ wrote:
Seems hard to believe that such an important function, "cups", is just
missing from the ports tree. I have updated the ports on my system
with:
# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
# cd /usr/ports
# make readmes && make index
So if I'm just doing
Hi, all:
In www category, there are some ports with a line as:
1 @${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}
It always followed by this line:
2 @${ECHO_CMD} '@exec ${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}'
>> ${TMPPLIST}
while some other ports do not have line 2.
Is line 2 need
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:46:10 +0800
wen heping wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
>In www category, there are some ports with a line as:
> 1 @${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}
>
>It always followed by this line:
> 2 @${ECHO_CMD} '@exec ${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}'
> >> ${TM
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Saige articulated:
> Well, when I cd to /usr/ports/print/cups and "make clean", "make
> install", it /seems/ to build... at least it does not complain. I get:
>
> # make clean
> ===> Cleaning for cups-1.4.2_1
> # make install clean
> ===> Extracting fo
Hello-
As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
we have two ports with the same name:
Port: gag-2.9
Path: /usr/ports/security/gag
Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector
Maint: po...@freebsd.org
B-deps:
R-deps:
WWW:http://www.washington.edu/Pe
Hi,
I just configured a Lenovo with 8.0-STABLE for
/usr/ports/security/bsp_upektfmess and then /usr/ports/security/pam_bsdbioapi
with some modifications:
Since libusb isn't in ports anymore, I've removed libusb line in
bsp_upektfmess's Makefile:
< LIB_DEPENDS=bioapi100.0:${PORTSDIR}/secur
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> Hello-
>
> As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
> we have two ports with the same name:
>
> Port: gag-2.9
> Path: /usr/ports/security/gag
> Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector
> Maint:
On Mar 9, 5:10 am, jhell wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:06, saige.losli@ wrote:
> >>> Seems hard to believe that such an important function, "cups", is just
> >>> missing from the ports tree. I have updated the ports on my system
> >>> with:
>
> >>> # csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
> >>> # cd
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:23:51AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
> we have two ports with the same name:
>
> Port: gag-2.9
> Path: /usr/ports/security/gag
> Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector
[...]
> Port: ga
On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Hello-
As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
we have two ports with the same name:
Port: gag-2.9
Path: /usr/ports/security/gag
Info: A sta
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:01:24 -0800
Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
> >Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> >
> >> Hello-
> >>
> >> As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
> >> we have two por
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:24:00 +0100
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:01:24 -0800
> Charlie Kester wrote:
>
> > On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > >On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
> > >Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello-
> > >>
> > >> As documented i
Hello,
The latest version of gscan2pdf from ports (0.9.29_1) has unsatisfied
dependencies:
ti...@kg-v2$ which gscan2pdf
/usr/local/bin/gscan2pdf
ti...@kg-v2$ gscan2pdf
Can't locate forks.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach
/usr/loc
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:24:00 +0100
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:01:24 -0800
> Charlie Kester wrote:
>
> > On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > >On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
> > >Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> > >So where's the problem? sysutils/gag doesn
Can I help maintaining Cherokee port? The current available version
(0.99.38) has various bugs fixed in the latest upstream version.
Here's the distinfo diff:
1,3c1,3
< MD5 (cherokee-0.99.38.tar.gz) = 67be28eda0673598fbb5b1cbd70de455
< SHA256 (cherokee-0.99.38.tar.gz) =
217bb708c8cc637570d07b335d
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Diego Schulz wrote:
> Can I help maintaining Cherokee port? The current available version
Welcome to maintain this unmaintained port.
I will take it.
wen
> (0.99.38) has various bugs fixed in the latest upstream version.
>
> Here's the distinfo diff:
>
> 1,3c1,
On 3/9/2010 11:01 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
Could be a problem for tools like portmaster that allow the user to
specify the port name only, rather than category/portname.
That only works for installed ports, FYI.
If a user has both gags installed and then runs "portmaster gag", how
should por
19 matches
Mail list logo
