On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
Steven Kreuzer <skreu...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Hello-
As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
we have two ports with the same name:
Port: gag-2.9
Path: /usr/ports/security/gag
Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector
Maint: po...@freebsd.org
B-deps:
R-deps:
WWW: http://www.washington.edu/People/dad/
Port: gag-4.9
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/gag
Info: Graphical Boot Manager
Maint: alepul...@freebsd.org
B-deps:
R-deps:
WWW: http://gag.sourceforge.net/
I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with
this.
My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that
security/gag should be
renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht.
Anyone vehemently opposed to this?
So where's the problem? sysutils/gag doesn't seem to install a binary
which would conflict with security/gag. In fact, it doesn't seem to
install an executable at all, based on examining the Makefile and
pkg-plist.
Could be a problem for tools like portmaster that allow the user to
specify the port name only, rather than category/portname.
If a user has both gags installed and then runs "portmaster gag", how
should portmaster resolve the ambiguity?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
