Hi all,
I'm looking to make a port for libss, so that I
can make another port (the zephyr IM library)
that depends on it. FreeBSD used to have a libss,
but kris removed it 7 years ago because it was not
getting used.
NetBSD still installs a libss, and they use the
source from Heimdal (which is i
Dnia piątek, 20 marca 2009, Cezary Morga napisał:
> Hi there.
>
> I've got a build problem with my net/wol port on amd64-8 (though it's
> not architecture specific, so it will most probably appear on i386 as
> well).
>
> I'm looking for someone running 8-CURRENT who could try building the
> port wi
Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1)
running on vendor code. Of course not all ports handle this well,
experimental ru
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
> few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
> multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1)
> running on vendor code.
Thanks for this very usefu
hello all
machine is freebsd/amd64, 7.1-REL
bgpctl reload dies with:
bgpd[12853]: imsg_get: imsg hdr len 0 out of bounds, type=0
bgpd[12853]: fatal in SE: session_dispatch_imsg: imsg_get error: Broken
pipe
bgpd[12852]: fatal in RDE: rde_dispatch_imsg_session: pipe closed
bgpd[12851]: d
Great work!
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1)
running on vendor code. Of course not all por
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Niclas Zeising
wrote:
> Great work!
Indeed.
>
> Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document this in
> ports(7) or make.conf(5) (or both) so it doesn't get lost in the mail-lists
> or if people are not reading ports@
>
Can it be added to UP
Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
> Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document this
> in ports(7) or make.conf(5) (or both) so it doesn't get lost in the
> mail-lists or if people are not reading ports@
I will document it soon, thinking The Handbook wou
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
> > few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
> > multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX fl
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
>
> > Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document this
> > in ports(7) or make.conf(5) (or both) so it doesn't get lost in the
> > mail-lists or if people are not
Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 10:58 -0400:
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
> >
> > > Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document this
> > > in ports(7) or make.conf(5) (or both) so it
Hi,
Today I tried to compile "deluge" . I had a stop in the make process .
The error I discovered is the same as :
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353897 . I applied the same
suggested temporary fix .
Would you need me to open a PR with details ?
Thanks
dan
__
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:19 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 10:58 -0400:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
> > >
> > > > Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to
Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 12:28 -0400:
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:19 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 10:58 -0400:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:11:02PM +0100, dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I tried to compile "deluge" . I had a stop in the make process .
> The error I discovered is the same as :
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353897 . I applied the same
> suggested temporary fix .
>
> Would you n
Hi
Has anyone had a go at porting DSpace to freebsd?
www.dspace.org
Software is BSD open licence - MIT in Colloaboration with HP
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, s
Hi
I am looking for a port of a Digital Asset Management tool to catalogue a
large (100,000 plus) collection of image files stored in a variety of common
file formats. Mainly CR2, CRW, psd, jpg & tiff. File sizes range from small
<50k to very large (up to 6GB) . A hierarchical and random Key wo
dan writes:
> Today I tried to compile "deluge". I had a stop in the make
> process. The error I discovered is the same as :
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353897 . I applied
> the same suggested temporary fix .
>
> Would you need me to open a PR with details ?
For
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
> multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1)
> running on vendor code. Of course not all ports handle this well,
A word of caution: It is quite possible for a port to build fine
wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
someone's being very lazy here. I decided to learn a bit of qt4, so I went
looking at the dozen different ports of qt4-* in ports/devel. Whoever did those
ports copied the description of the entire qt (not even noting what version it
is) to every s
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1)
running on vendor code. Of course not all ports handle thi
Christian Weisgerber píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 18:09 +:
> > If you are FreeBSD port maintainer:
> >
> > Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the
> > use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes to a block
> > somewhere below dependency declarations.
>
Brian Whalen píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 12:08 -0700:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last
> > few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on
> > multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to mak
Question,
I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to
parent make rule.
I have zero gmake fu, can anyone help me make sense of that? The good
news is tha
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Question,
>
> I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
> message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
>
> gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to
> parent make rule.
>
> I have ze
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:02 -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Question,
> >
> > I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
> > message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
> >
> > gmake[1]: warning: jobserver u
On Tue March 24 2009 19:24:44 Chuck Robey wrote:
> OTOH, the KDE folks deserve an attaboy for NOT doing this to folks.
Please post your insults somewhere else but not here! Do not spam the
mailing lists with such a nonsense! You do not have the right to judge the
kde@ people!
You actually have
Marco Bröder wrote:
> On Tue March 24 2009 19:24:44 Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> OTOH, the KDE folks deserve an attaboy for NOT doing this to folks.
>
> Please post your insults somewhere else but not here! Do not spam the
> mailing lists with such a nonsense!
Marco, I think you misunderstood what C
On Tue March 24 2009 22:47:28 Doug Barton wrote:
> Marco, I think you misunderstood what Chuck said. The term "attaboy"
> is an English colloquialism that means roughly "congratulations for a
> job well done." What Chuck is saying is that the kde maintainers
> should be congratulated for adding app
Well, I've been slacking a bit lately with this so this is what I've got
so far.
It build against mod_perl2+Apache2, libxml2 and libxslt. Xalan is not
supported.
http://therek.net/freebsd/ports/www/p5-Embperl/
--
Cezary Morga
"If you live to be one hundred, you've got it made. Very few people
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
> On Tue March 24 2009 22:47:28 Doug Barton wrote:
> > Marco, I think you misunderstood what Chuck said. The term "attaboy"
> > is an English colloquialism that means roughly "congratulations for a
> > job well done." What Chuck is saying is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
> Marco Bröder wrote:
>> On Tue March 24 2009 19:24:44 Chuck Robey wrote:
>>
>>> OTOH, the KDE folks deserve an attaboy for NOT doing this to folks.
>> Please post your insults somewhere else but not here! Do not spam the
>> mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
matt donovan wrote:
>
> Chuck is more complaining about the QT4 ports descriptions since he does
> not get it that all of it is required to program in QT4. so of course it
> will all have the same description since it all comes from one tarball
> thi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
> David Schultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Gustau Perez wrote:
> >> a few time ago I switched to current, right now I've it updated to
> >> yesterday. While compiling some ports (in fact, building x11/gnome2) I
> >> found that some of them (written
Pav Lucistnik writes:
> If you are FreeBSD port maintainer:
I'm not one.
>
> Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the
> use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes to a block
> somewhere below dependency declarations. If you know your port does not
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
