Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 12:28 -0400: > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:19 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 10:58 -0400: > > > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100: > > > > > > > > > Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document > > > > > this > > > > > in ports(7) or make.conf(5) (or both) so it doesn't get lost in the > > > > > mail-lists or if people are not reading ports@ > > > > > > > > I will document it soon, thinking The Handbook would be best place. > > > > > > > > > > Definitely add it to UPDATING too. This will allow people who typically > > > do something like "make configure && make -j3" to now know that they > > > > This would break very fast -- it's passing -j3 to port Makefile instead > > of vendor Makefile. > > This has worked fine for me for countless years, except where the > vendor's Makefiles were not parallel-safe. This has been my trick to get > larger things (like mysql or xorg-server) to make in parallel. It *did* > work. If this has changed, then it definitely warrants mention in > UPDATING.
Then it must have worked all these years by pure chance :) -- Pav Lucistnik <p...@oook.cz> <p...@freebsd.org> 94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy