___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Le Dim 11 jan 09 à 0:25:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik
écrivait :
> > 1) rename devel/boost to devel/boost-134
> > 2) switch all ports depending on devel/boost to devel/boost-134
> > 3) check-in boost-1.37 as devel/boost
> > 4) have enough time to fix applications depending on boost-1.34
> > one-by-on
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: firefox-i18n-2.0.0.20: no entry for
/usr/ports/www/xpi-quick-locale-switcher
make_index: ja-zope-jaMailHost-0.4.4: no entry for /usr/
This is due to pointyhat filling its discs up. No worries here.
-erwin
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:26:47AM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
> pkg_info: not found
> pkg_info: not found
> pkg_info: not found
> Don
/ports/cad/spice comes back with a size mismatch.
I kinda new so it is not easily fixable my me yet.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsub
Hi list,
Could anyone please explain to me whether it's really required to
have two extra versions of gcc installed. I Recently upgraded
"py25-numpy", which in turn pulled in "gcc-4.2.5_20081126" as a
dependency. A few days ago "blas" refused to compile because:
===>Verifying reinsta
In message , Mark Knight
writes
Directories are appearing in this location but when I re-start
squeezecenter it's as if the Plugins aren't installed. I'm not seeing
any errors in the log files.
This is fixed in the latest version of the port. Thanks!!
--
Mark A. R. Knight
Nikolaj Thygesen wrote:
>Could anyone please explain to me whether it's really required to
>have two extra versions of gcc installed. I Recently upgraded
>"py25-numpy", which in turn pulled in "gcc-4.2.5_20081126" as a
>dependency. A few days ago "blas" refused to compile because:
This occ
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to port sup[1], a MUA, to FreeBSD. For that I've created its
port and the ports of it dependencies. I've faced following problems
while porting:
1. Some of its dependencies are already ported to FreeBSD but are using
a tarball as source instead of the gem which is expec
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello,
After updating my xterm port, uxterm stopped working saying that:
% uxterm
xterm: bad command line option "-u8"
usage: xterm [-/+132] [-C] [-Sccn] [-T string] [-/+ah] [-/+ai] [-/+aw]
[-b number] [-/+bc] [-bcf milliseconds] [-bcn milliseconds] [-bd color]
[-/+bdc] [-bg color] [-b
Hello Joe!
Can you let us know when associated updates to The FreeBSD-Gnome site
will be updated
to reflect the new version, including recommended upgrade procedures, please?
I'm referring to: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/. If I'm pointing to the wrong
place here, do
forgive..,
Thanks.
R
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:13:45 -0600, Stacey Roberts
wrote:
Hello Joe!
Can you let us know when associated updates to The FreeBSD-Gnome
site will be updated
to reflect the new version, including recommended upgrade procedures,
please?
I'm referring to: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/.
Nikolaj Thygesen wrote:
Hi list,
Could anyone please explain to me whether it's really required to
have two extra versions of gcc installed. I Recently upgraded
"py25-numpy", which in turn pulled in "gcc-4.2.5_20081126" as a
dependency. A few days ago "blas" refused to compile because:
2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik
>
> That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in
> a single system?
>
That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
libraries, but for header files the suggested solution would require placing
headers under /usr/local/include
Alexander Churanov píše v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 21:38 +0300:
> 2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik
>
> That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions
> coexist in
> a single system?
>
>
> That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
> librarie
Vlad GURDIGA writes:
> Hello,
> After updating my xterm port, uxterm stopped working saying that:
> % uxterm
> xterm: bad command line option "-u8"
> usage: xterm [-/+132] [-C] [-Sccn] [-T string] [-/+ah] [-/+ai] [-/+aw]
> [-b number] [-/+bc] [-bcf milliseconds] [-bcn milliseconds] [-bd co
Robert Huff wrote:
Hello:
A few days ago, gcc-4.3 became the default fortran compiler for
the ports. Go ahead and erase the gcc-4.2 compiler - create the
gcc-4.3 compiler, and everything after that will be fine.
1) What is the realtionship between this gcc and the gcc used
to comp
FYI
Regarding the pib port under FreeBSD 7.1 (Release).
After a 'make install', I needed to do the following for it to work:
cd /usr/local/bin/
ln -s wish8.4 wish8.2
cd /usr/ports
ln -s INDEX-7 INDEX
-
thanks for your time,
Patrice Remy
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:38:10 -0600, Alexander Churanov
wrote:
2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik
That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in
a single system?
That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
libraries, but for header files the suggested s
Yes, the gcc ports are used partly because the Fortran compiler was removed
from the base system. (They might have
been used anyway, to take advantage of
the improvements in later versions of
gcc. ) bsd.gcc.mk fixes the specific
compiler used via the value of
the WITH_FORTRAN variable in a port
Ma
21 matches
Mail list logo
