Diego Depaoli-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Andrey
> wrote:
>
>> I faced with the following issue while qt4-designer has been upgrading:
>>
>> --- ---
>>
>> [sil...@beastie][/usr/ports]sudo portupgrade -R 'qt4-*'
>> +++ +++
>> Stop in
>> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-designer/work/qt-
Silver Salonen wrote:
>
>
> Diego Depaoli-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Andrey
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I faced with the following issue while qt4-designer has been upgrading:
>>>
>>> --- ---
>>>
>>> [sil...@beastie][/usr/ports]sudo portupgrade -R 'qt4-*'
>>> +++ +++
>>> Stop in
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello Mario and Porters,
Trying to setup mplayer to play DVD's on my blueray player, one of
the suggested means to do this was to try out mplayer from SVN.
Unfortunately I ran into some issues with x264_t, and to make a long
story short I realized I needed to update the
On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Koop Mast wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello Mario and Porters,
Trying to setup mplayer to play DVD's on my blueray player, one of
the suggested means to do this was to try out mplayer from SVN.
Unfortunately I ran into some issues with x264_t, and to make a long
miwi-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing
> with KDE 4.2.
>
> The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time
> consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much
> better shape so we can now go
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 03:21:34 -0800 (PST), Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Another issue - with kdebase4-runtime this time:
> =
> Scanning dependencies of target kio_about
> [ 21%] Building CXX object
> kioslave/about/CMakeFiles/kio_about.dir/kio_about_automoc.o
> [ 21%] Building CXX object
>
please?
Reply-To:
X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc
Greetings,
can someone please commit ports/129755 (fetchmail update to 6.3.9) on
"maintainer timeout" grounds?
I filed the PR 20 days ago, and it fixes two critical bugs (potential
data loss) and a long-standing regressi
Hello,
would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more
features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all
other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills
the ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Michel.
By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
the DragonFlyBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry wrote:
> I am attempting to create my first port. I seem to have run into a
> problem thought.
>
> I want to create a port for a Perl module,
> 'Captcha-reCAPTCHA-Mailhide'. I created the test port
> in /usr/ports/local/p5-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-Mail
"Janky Jay, III" wrote:
> By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
> to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
> a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
> the DragonFlyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
> This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
> only it is much smaller and presumably more secure.
I have previously seen it advocated for base as an alternative for
systems that e.g. only need to send cronm
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
> "Janky Jay, III" wrote:
>
> > By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
> > to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
> > a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly de
Bugzilla from m...@issp.ac.ru wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 03:21:34 -0800 (PST), Silver Salonen wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Another issue - with kdebase4-runtime this time:
>> =
>> Scanning dependencies of target kio_about
>> [ 21%] Building CXX object
>> kioslave/about/CMakeFiles/kio_about.dir/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Michel.
Ah! Okay. This makes much more sense... Its not a problem at all to
port the mail agent to FreeBSD. Just create a port, test and submit it
and voila! Sorry for the misunderstanding earlier...
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Michel Talon
> I see no reason for it not to be in ports. If it's useful like you
> described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
> glad it is maintained in the ports tree. If you're willing to maintain
> it please submit a PR with your work.
Sweet, is anyone with commit access willi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Sam.
Of course. Once the port is submitted via a PR, it will be looked over
and committed. Check out the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/ for more
information about how to create and submit
Whoever manages BIND..
SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's
implementation, but I am
not sure... I'm just the mailman here :)
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641&rss
I checked versions 6.2 through 7.0 and see that they _could_ be vulnerable as
t
I applied this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/xorg-7.4-111608.patch
I then tried upgrading via portmaster -vra
and I also tried upgrading manually
when installing x11-servers/xorg-server I get the following error
gnome-config: not found
configure: error: Package requirements (x11 xext
Is there a way to depend on another port with specific knobs?
--
Eitan Adler
"Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave."
-Jakob Nielsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Le Jeu 8 jan 09 à 8:17:53 +0100, Richard Samuel
écrivait :
> Thierry,
Hello,
> Sorry, 1.5.1 is more my term than their's, a better term would be OpenFOAM
> 1.5-CURRENT. Yes it from the latest git sources.
>
> BTW thanks for all your work on OpenFOAM and Paraview - without it I would
> not ha
I just rolled up a new patchset. This has not been through tinderbox
yet, so you have been warned... This update should pretty much have us
current with all released xorg bits.
http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/xorg-update-010809.patch.bz2
robert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:59 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I applied this patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/xorg-7.4-111608.patch
>
> I then tried upgrading via portmaster -vra
> and I also tried upgrading manually
>
> when installing x11-servers/xorg-server I get the following error
> gno
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel wrote:
> Whoever manages BIND..
>
> SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's
> implementation, but I am
> not sure... I'm just the mailman here :)
>
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641&rss
>
> I checked versi
Le jeudi 08 janvier 2009, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
> > This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
> > only it is much smaller and presumably more secure.
>
> I have previously seen it advocated for base as an alte
Robert Noland wrote:
> I just rolled up a new patchset. This has not been through tinderbox
> yet, so you have been warned... This update should pretty much have us
> current with all released xorg bits.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/xorg-update-010809.patch.bz2
>
> robert.
>
I didn'
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:36:38PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> I just rolled up a new patchset. This has not been through tinderbox
> yet, so you have been warned... This update should pretty much have us
> current with all released xorg bits.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/xorg-update
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 18:46 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > I just rolled up a new patchset. This has not been through tinderbox
> > yet, so you have been warned... This update should pretty much have us
> > current with all released xorg bits.
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 00:36 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:36:38PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > I just rolled up a new patchset. This has not been through tinderbox
> > yet, so you have been warned... This update should pretty much have us
> > current with all released
| By Michel Talon
| [ 2009-01-08 16:09 +0200 ]
> would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
> FreeBSD?
I use ssmtp on many systems and would love to try dma. Looking forward to
seeing it in ports! Thanks!
Regards,
Aragon
___
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing
> with KDE 4.2.
kdepim4 stops building around 25% with kdepim-3.5.10 installed because
libkleo complains about undefined reference to QGpgME.
Can someone confirm that?
Regards
--
Die
> Would need more specifics to even guess what could have been wrong...
> Most particularly what hardware, gfx chip, i386/amd64 and which drivers
> were involved, steps to reproduce the issue if any. Basically, the more
> info the better.
What commands should I run? I am not familiar with the "wh
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 22:34 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > Would need more specifics to even guess what could have been wrong...
> > Most particularly what hardware, gfx chip, i386/amd64 and which drivers
> > were involved, steps to reproduce the issue if any. Basically, the more
> > info the bette
Eitan Adler wrote:
Is there a way to depend on another port with specific knobs?
The usual trick is to create a slave port of the dependency with the
required set of knobs pre-configured, and depend on that instead.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
34 matches
Mail list logo
