On Monday 21 July 2008 23:27:49 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
> >> 09:27:38 PDT 20
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:07:53AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008 23:27:49 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> FreeBSD **.vizion2
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:07:53AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008 23:27:49 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> FreeBSD **.vizion2
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Rafaël Carré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:46:53PM +0300, Okalany Daniel wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 01:16:30 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:07:53AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Monday 21 July 2008 23:27:49 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:
The following portsupgrade reports for bsdpan lead me to ask a few trivial
questions and suggestions (see below)
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 1012 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
---> Skipping 'bsdpan-libnet-1.21' because it is held by user (specify -f to
force)
---> Skipping 'de
David Southwell wrote:
The following portsupgrade reports for bsdpan lead me to ask a few trivial
questions and suggestions (see below)
1. why are some packages listed in the format:
- isc/p5-Array-Compare (bsdpan-Array-Compare-1.15)
rather than:
- (bsdpan-libwww-perl-5.813)
Ports tree co
Hello,
Reporting failure in Updating the Ports Database
Second run, used pre-generated version of INDEX , I think everything is as
defined in failure message
FreeBSD econ.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Oct 17 05:16:31 PDT
2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMATUK_KERNE
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 05:42:05 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > The following portsupgrade reports for bsdpan lead me to ask a few
> > trivial questions and suggestions (see below)
> >
> > 1. why are some packages listed in the format:
> > - isc/p5-Array-Compare (bsdpan-Ar
David Southwell wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 05:42:05 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
The following portsupgrade reports for bsdpan lead me to ask a few
trivial questions and suggestions (see below)
1. why are some packages listed in the format:
- isc/p5-Array-Compare (bsd
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 07:00:09 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 05:42:05 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> >> David Southwell wrote:
> >>> The following portsupgrade reports for bsdpan lead me to ask a few
> >>> trivial questions and suggestions (see belo
David Southwell wrote:
2. There is another question on similar lines because some packages
helpfully show the hierarchy in the ports tree etc:
devel/***
rather than simply
***
Why 'devel/'? There's no confidence that thees packages have their
corresponding ports.
I do not think you read caref
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Okalany Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Rafaël Carré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>> >> On Fr
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:07:53AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
>
> The "base system" does not add anything to the ports/pkg database. The
> reason you have gcc 4.1.3 and gcc 4.2.5 on your machine is because some
> othe
2008/7/22 Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Okalany Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Rafaël Carré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 08:16:38 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:07:53AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> >
> > The "base system" does not add anything to the ports/pkg database. The
> > reason you ha
On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
2008/7/22 Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Okalany Daniel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Garrett Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Rafaël C
Hello.
Would someone please commit this PR with maintainer timeout?
Regards.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Why has committing a patch gotten so complicated?
--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ólafur Osvaldsson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 22, 2008 22:17
Subject: Re: ports/125625: [PATCH] dns/nsd: USE_RC_SUBR != yes
Synopsis: [PATCH]
I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked
deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed.
Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I
have the current version of AmberTools building with no problems from
within a skeleton port.
Xin LI wrote:
[...]
I have committed these changes as part of OpenLDAP 2.4.11, thanks for
your submission!
A line that isn't supposed to exist is still present in 2.4.11. When
compiling from ports the DATABASEDIR is still created.
The line:
@-$(INSTALL) -m 700 -d $(DESTDIR)$(localstate
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:40:15PM -0500, M. L. Dodson wrote:
> I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked
> deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed.
>
> Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I
> have the current versi
M. L. Dodson wrote:
I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked
deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed.
Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I
have the current version of AmberTools building with no problems from
wi
Hello there,
it appears that an old(ish) bug has come back in the cfengine port?
Its compiling with the oldest existing BDB version found on the system.
Tested on both 7.0 and 6.3 with the same result.
Configure says:
===> cfengine-2.2.7 depends on shared library: db-4.6.0 - found
but then 4.0
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:03:22 -0700 Simon Shapiro wrote:
> Hello there,
> it appears that an old(ish) bug has come back in the cfengine port?
> Its compiling with the oldest existing BDB version found on the system.
> Tested on both 7.0 and 6.3 with the same result.
> Configure says:
> ===> cfen
On Jul 22, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:03:22 -0700 Simon Shapiro wrote:
Hello there,
it appears that an old(ish) bug has come back in the cfengine port?
Its compiling with the oldest existing BDB version found on the
system.
Tested on both 7.0 and 6.3 wi
26 matches
Mail list logo
