Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have brought a older port maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
current version I have done all the work needed to make it
committable I have several questions first:
1. How do I take maintainership of the port?
Just change it in the Makefile. Users who sh
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including\nexperimental
development code and obsolete releases.\n
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has b
Hi,
thanks for the answer.
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
Could you check that you have up-to-date and consistent ports?
Or, otherwise, is it possible that there are some stale files laying
around in your system?
I have just installed x11-wm/enlightenment-devel without any problems
and it runs too. I ha
On Saturday 31 May 2008 08:38:27 pm Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > packages are usually built from the ports tree, but not always, and
> > users may use packages without a ports tree present on the local system.
>
> short of doing pkg_delete -af then pkg_add /some/dir
> are th
running the firefox-2.0.0.14,1 port on 6.3 i keep getting
SetWindow
NewStream
WriteReady
Write
decoding...
shmget: Cannot allocate memory
Size = 336 x 280
shmat: Invalid argument
The program 'firefox-bin' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error wa
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:20:13 -0500, David Coder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
running the firefox-2.0.0.14,1 port on 6.3 i keep getting
SetWindow
NewStream
WriteReady
Write
decoding...
shmget: Cannot allocate memory
You have ran out of shared memory. To solve this, you can reboot your
machine
from freshports.org:
>> 2006-04-08
>> Affects: users of www/linux-flashplugin*
>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Reason:
>> These ports have been removed because the End User License Agreement
>> explicitly forbids to run the Flash Player on FreeBSD.
>> For more details, see
>> http://www.macromedia
Derek Graham schreef:
> from freshports.org:
>>> 2006-04-08
>>> Affects: users of www/linux-flashplugin*
>>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Reason:
>>> These ports have been removed because the End User License Agreement
>>> explicitly forbids to run the Flash Player on FreeBSD.
>>> For more detail
Hello,
I have a brand new machine with 7.0-STABLE-200805 AMD64 (GENERIC
kernel). Today I installed all the required packages using "pkg_add
-r", including xfce-4.4.2. Now if I run "startxfce" I get the desktop
environment running but neither the "Quit" option of the desktop menu
nor the quit butto
Derek Graham wrote:
from freshports.org:
2006-04-08
Affects: users of www/linux-flashplugin*
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason:
These ports have been removed because the End User License Agreement
explicitly forbids to run the Flash Player on FreeBSD.
For more details, see
http://www.macromedia
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:09:58 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from freshports.org:
> >> 2006-04-08
> >> Affects: users of www/linux-flashplugin*
> >> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Reason:
> >> These ports have been removed because the End User License
> >> Agreement explicitly forb
on Monday 02 June 2008Monday 02 June 2008 RW RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:09:58 -0500
>
> Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > from freshports.org:
> > >> 2006-04-08
> > >> Affects: users of www/linux-flashplugin*
> > >> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Reason:
> >
From: Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux-flashplugin9 Restricted?
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:27:07 -0500
> Then why do they still show up as Restricted in portfresh and ports?
Because flashplugin is commercial software and it is not allowed by
EULA to create FreeBSD package and red
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:27:07 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on Monday 02 June 2008Monday 02 June 2008 RW RW
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:09:58 -0500
> > Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I found this odd, I remember seeing an email from ado
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:27:07 -0500
> Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> on Monday 02 June 2008Monday 02 June 2008 RW RW
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:09:58 -0500
>> > Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > > I found this odd, I remember seeing an ema
> AFAIK Flash9 relies on the Linux 2.6 kernel, and so wont run on
> FreeBSDs default of 2.4. I've not tried it, but I think people have said
> it can be made to run with 2.6 emulation.
>
If someone reading this has time,motivation, and the know how could they
please look into getting flash 9 on Fr
on Monday 02 June 2008Monday 02 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK Flash9 relies on the Linux 2.6 kernel, and so wont run on
> > FreeBSDs default of 2.4. I've not tried it, but I think people have said
> > it can be made to run with 2.6 emulation.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a brand new machine with 7.0-STABLE-200805 AMD64 (GENERIC
> kernel). Today I installed all the required packages using "pkg_add
> -r", including xfce-4.4.2. Now if I run "startxfce" I get the desk
To reply - figure it out
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
boundary="==628ED6B4E6FA03BA9DD4=="
--==628ED6B4E6FA03BA9DD4==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been updated
to reflect recent EoL (end-of-life) events. The new list is below and
at http://security.freebsd.org/ >. FreeBSD 5.5, FreeBSD 6.1, and
FreeBSD 6.2 have `expired
20 matches
Mail list logo
