[patch] Incredible speedup of pkg_add/pkg_delete!

Here is a patch that greatly speeds up package dependency registration/deregistration on install/deinstall, especially for packages with huge numbers of dependencies. I plan to commit it to -CURRENT in a week. I'd like to get some reviews and wider testing exposure before I do that. Instructions:

Re: How to set CFLAGS for the build step?

On Friday 04 April 2008 06:27:37 Dirk Meyer wrote: > Max Laier schrieb:, > > > This currently works for empty and test{1,2}, but fails for test3. > > > > This test3 uses a make.conf (passed via MAKE_ARGS= __MAKE_CONF=...) > > that has a > > > > CFLAGS= -test > > not MAKE_ARGS, MAKE_ENV > > - MA

Error while building jdk15 from ports

Hello, I'm trying to build sipxpbx from ports and one of the requirements is jdk15. I have updated my ports tree to the latest version and downloaded the following files: bsd-jdk15-patches-8.tar.bz2 diablo-caffe-freebsd6-i386-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2 jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007

Re: How to set CFLAGS for the build step?

On Friday 04 April 2008 14:21:23 Dirk Meyer wrote: > Max Laier schrieb:, > > > Okay, this doesn't help one bit - sorry. Or are you suggesting that > > I simply disregard user-set CFLAGS in make.conf by using /dev/null as > > make.conf? This seems to contradict > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: > >> Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> After a few days of portupgrading and cussing, I got things updated, but >>> portupgrade takes eons because of these messages: >>> >>> ===> Registering ins

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: After a few days of portupgrading and cussing, I got things updated, but portupgrade takes eons because of these messages: ===> Registering installation for eel-2.22.1 pkg_create: dependency loop detected for

Where is Snort 2.8?

Hi everyone, I am wondering if somebody is working on updating the ports for Snort. The latest version in ports is still 2.7.0.1-1 while 2.8 is out since October 2007. I emailed the maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED] according to freshports.org) but I a

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: After a few days of portupgrading and cussing, I got things updated, but portupgrade takes eons because of these messages

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: After a few days of portupgrading an

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:01:37 -0500, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:01:37 -0500, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wro

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > > > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECT

New invitation from Greg Garafola

You have been invited to connect as friends with Greg Garafola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please accept or reject this invitation by clicking below: http://www.bebo.com/in/6268401168a921555385b134 .. Please do not reply directly to th

problem compiling sysutils-kmod

(I've e-mailed the maintainer, but had o response.) Trying to build devel/fusefs-kmod (as a dependency) I get this: ===> Extracting for fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208 => MD5 Checksum OK for fuse4bsd/498acaef33b0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for fuse4bsd/498acaef33b0.tar.gz. ===>

Re: openoffice and java

Quoting Volker Glatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ___ the easy out is to install a jdk-15 before building openoffice as it is required for the build. The java/diablo-jdk15 port is probably the quickest to install. Thanks, I installed java/diablo-jdk15

Re: Error while building jdk15 from ports

Hi! On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Rudi Kramer - MWEB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gcc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus) What does dmesg say? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Anatoly Borodin business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Error while building jdk15 from ports

Hi! On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Rudi Kramer - MWEB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gcc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus) Does dmesg say anything about it? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Anatoly Borodin business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: openoffice and java

On Friday 04 April 2008, eculp wrote: > Quoting Volker Glatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > ___ > >> > >> the easy out is to install a jdk-15 before building openoffice > >> as it is required for the build. The java/diablo-jdk15 port is > >> probably the qu

Re: openoffice and java

David Booth writes: > I do not have a suggested fix, but I found similar behavior when > I tried to compile it with JDK 1.6. Diablo 1.5 worked fine for > me though. From the Makefile: USE_JAVA= yes JAVA_BUILD= jdk JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava .if (${OSVERSION} >= 70

Re: Gnome ports messed up (dependency loops)

On Apr 04, Denise H. G. wrote: > Manually run 'pkgdb -Fu'. It might help. I have a few times, but the instructions given in UPDATING don't give me an indication of /how/ I should be answering these questions posed by pkgdb -Ff (or Fu, or whatever). For example, it's not clear to me /why/ we're un

FreeBSD Custom Package Server

Hi all, I maintain several FreeBSD servers all of which currently use the ports system to install and update the needed software. I don't like using packages since I often need customizations made during the build process. For instance, my remote VPS has only 2 GB of disk space, so I need to build

Re: problem compiling sysutils-kmod

Rong-en Fan writes: > Is your ports tree up-to-date? Every night at midnight EST. > If so, did you have previous kernel compiling objects at > /usr/obj? There is an uninstalled buildworld in /usr/obj. buildkernel stuff? Shouldn't be - /usr/obj gets "rm -rf"ed every

Re: problem compiling sysutils-kmod

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I've e-mailed the maintainer, but had o response.) > > Trying to build devel/fusefs-kmod (as a dependency) I get this: > > ===> Extracting for fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208 > => MD5 Checksum OK for fuse4b

Re: problem compiling sysutils-kmod

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rong-en Fan writes: > > > > Is your ports tree up-to-date? > > Every night at midnight EST. > > > > If so, did you have previous kernel compiling objects at > > /usr/obj? > > There is an uninstalled buil

Re: problem compiling sysutils-kmod

Rong-en Fan writes: > > There is an uninstalled buildworld in /usr/obj. > > buildkernel stuff? Shouldn't be - /usr/obj gets "rm -rf"ed > > every night. > > OK, then do a buildkernel then build fusefs-kmod. Another way is not to > set KERNCONF in make.conf. I think

New squil ports

I'm the port maintainer for security/sguil-sensor, security/sguil-server and security/sguil-client. These ports go together and need to be updated together. At present, the version is 0.6.1.3. The new ports will be version 0.7.0 and have some very significant changes from the previous versio

Re: New squil ports

--On April 4, 2008 11:35:59 PM -0500 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm the port maintainer for security/sguil-sensor, security/sguil-server and security/sguil-client. A gzipped tarball of the three new ports is attached in case anyone wants to test them. Inside the tarball is gzippe

gnutls-2.2.2 segfaults

I upgraded to the latest gnutls-2.2.2 port in addition libgcrypt is also updated. For over a month now the port has been buggy and segfaults. 1 - certtool tool seg faults on execution. 2 - everything I compile that depends on gnutls such as the gnutls module for inspircd segfaults. gnutls-2.2.2