On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:01:37 -0500, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:40:55 -0500, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:24:12 -0500, Christopher Arnold < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Denise H. G. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After a few days of portupgrading and cussing, I got > > > things > > > > > > > > > > updated, but > > > > > > > > > > portupgrade takes eons because of these messages: > > > > > > > > > > ===> Registering installation for eel-2.22.1 > > > > > > > > > > pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package > > > > > > > > > > libgnomeui-2.22.01:x11-toolkits/libgnomeui > > > > > > > > > > pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package > > > > > > > > > > gnome-desktop-2.22.0:x11/gnome-desktop > > > > > > > > > > pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package > > > > > > > > > > gnome-desktop-2.22.0:x11/gnome-desktop > > > > > > > > > > ===> Cleaning for eel-2.22.1 > > > > > > > > > > Of course, nothing here tells me what is precisely > > > looping. > > > > > > > > > > Is it an > > > > > > > > > > immediate loop or indirect loop? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manually run 'pkgdb -Fu'. It might help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Following the information in /usr/pors/UPDATING takes > > > care of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > dependency loop... > > > > > > > > (And yes it includes pkgdb -Ff) > > > > > > > > So it got me further, but i still have issues with > > > compoiling > > > > > > > > gnome2, > > > > > > > > gnome2-power-tools and evince. > > > > > > > > I belive evince is the showstopper here with: > > > > > > > > checking for gsapi_new_instance in -lgs... no > > > > > > > > configure: error: You need libgs in order to compile > > > libspectre > > > > > > > > Am i the only one? Or is everyone else also waiting for a > > > final > > > > > > > > update > > > > > > > > taking care of this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have problems compiling libspectre or evince. Have > > > you > > > > > > > updated > > > > > > > your ports tree to the latest? My box is 7-STABLE/amd64. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes it is libspectre haveing a hard time to compile, evince > > > and > > > > > > gnome depend on it. > > > > > > Yes a completly fresh ports from today and im running on > > > 6.3-STABLE > > > > > > from March the 16'th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Show us the output of 'pkg_info -IX ghostscript'. > > > > > > > > > > ghostscript-gnu-7.07_17 GNU Postscript interpreter > > > > > > > > > > It explains... ahze only has change in ghostscript-gpl to enable with > > > library by default. Is there any reason why you don't use > > > ghostscript-gpl > > > instead (/usr/ports/UPDATING at 20070405)? If you want to keep > > > ghostscript-gnu, try to reinstall it with WITH_SHLIB. I personal don't > > > know > > > if libspectre will work with ghostscript-gnu. > > > > > > > > > it won't build. you must use ghostscript-gpl > > > > That USE_GHOSTSCRIPT=yes needs to be fix. Maybe we need to add a check of > if -gnu exists then give user the better info of need to use -gpl instead in > libspectre? okay, sounds good.. I'll work on it. > > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Mezz > > > > > > /Chris > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FreeBSD GNOME Team > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
