On Saturday 22 March 2008, Xin LI wrote:
> Da Rock wrote:
> > Just a quick question: is there anything on the horizon with porting KDE
> > 4?
>
> I think it was being tested/refining. More information can be found at
> http://freebsd.kde.org/ .
and http://wiki.freebsd.org/KDE4
___
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:53:30AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I've bumped into this as well. I suspect you did a portupgrade of
> goffice recently and that updated it from 0.4 to 0.6 - which (AFAIK)
> gnucash won't work with.
Yes. But the old (before upgrade to 2.2.3_3) gnucash-2.2.0_1 depen
Synopsis: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of Mozilla-Firefox
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: bz
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 12:10:02 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reassign to the right people.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg
Problem seems solved, see last sentence below.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:49:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter Olsson wrote:
>
> > TMPDIR doesn't seem to be set at all, I don't have it in "set".
> > Shell is bash.
>
> Ok.
>
> > Here is /etc/make.conf if that is relevant:
> > WITHOUT_X11=ye
The following reply was made to PR amd64/121951; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Squire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: amd64/121951: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of
Mozilla-Firefox
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:55:32 +010
Here's a bounty for someone to create an amd64 port of Opera:
Free admission to BSDCan 2008. Must be in the ports tree
by 29 March 2008. More or less. Might be flexible.
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-p
Supposedly SMP is available by default in 7.0, but I didn't see the
'options SMP' entry in the generic config. I take it that is
unnecessary for SMP support now?
_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING:
This says it's for real time in the config. Chances are, i don't need
it, but I'd like to verify. Mostly I
Jim Stapleton wrote:
Supposedly SMP is available by default in 7.0, but I didn't see the
'options SMP' entry in the generic config. I take it that is
unnecessary for SMP support now?
No, I think you are referring to the fact that sysinstall will install a
kernel compiled with options SMP if ru
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:58:08AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
> Supposedly SMP is available by default in 7.0, but I didn't see the
> 'options SMP' entry in the generic config. I take it that is
> unnecessary for SMP support now?
Incorrect on both accounts. You do need the option to get SMP.
Th
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/directfb.diff
I forget to ask: why should directfb be linked with lwres?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Anatoly Borodin
business: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following reply was made to PR amd64/121951; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Squire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: amd64/121951: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of Mozilla-Firefox
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:45:42 -0400
On Sat
Hi,
I've been hacking at the Cinelerra Community Version in the hope of getting
it working on FreeBSD 7. The old ALSA-only problem of old Cinelerras is
gone since they added OSS support. I've got it compiled and executing, but
I think I'm hitting a pthread deadlock issue as the process just hang
Old Synopsis: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of Mozilla-Firefox
New Synopsis: www/firefox: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of Mozilla-Firefox
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->gnome
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 20:03:44 UTC 2008
Responsible-Ch
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:10:43 -0400
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zane C.B. wrote:
> > I have lost use and interest in it. Currently looking at dropping
> > maintainer ship.
> I'll take it. I use for work and help maintain apache.org's
> instance of it.
Sweet. Enjoy. I've subm
I have been stupid. I'v braged about FreeBSD and the software being almost
up do date. That was my mistake!
I volunteered to port a simple application and submitted it the 14 of
January. And its still opened and unassigned. On further investigation I see
that its not only my application.
What
Anyone have any ideas?
I just did a portsnap fetch and extract about 10 days ago, so I think
I've got the most recent release.
Here is the header of Makefile
# New ports collection makefile for: OpenOffice.org
# Date created: 28 February 2002
# Whom: Martin Bla
In regards to the index file, what are the E, P, and F deps?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:37 -0400
Kenneth Freidank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a post on a Russian OpenNET site
> (http://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID1/79081.html#4) with the
> exact same error as myself.
>
> The Russian er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:42:09 -0500
"Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In regards to the index file, what are the E, P, and F deps?
Read the comment around line 5269 in Mk/bsd.port.mk and these two
explanations:
http://lists.freebsd.org
* Zane C.B. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In regards to the index file, what are the E, P, and F deps?
Extract, patch, fetch respectively, I suppose.
--
Dmitry A. Marakasov| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.amdmi3.ru
__
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:42 PM, GP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been stupid. I'v braged about FreeBSD and the software being almost
> up do date. That was my mistake!
> I volunteered to port a simple application and submitted it the 14 of
> January. And its still opened and unassigned. On f
21 matches
Mail list logo
