On Nov 20, 2007 5:11 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 camps)?
>
> If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into
> gmail (*WITH* a chat open
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 09:23:24PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Mer 21 nov 07 ? 1:44:33 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> ?crivait?:
>
> > >It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with
> > >stlport/config/stl_gcc.h.
> > >
> > >What version of
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local
Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question
at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the
possibility of doing it for the user at port install time.
If what you're trying to say
From: Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:56 -0600
> I'd rather see USE_GCC set unconditionally, so that INDEX will
> be the same on 6 and 7.
Me too.
> Is there any hope of the software being updated? My concern is
> that once w
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote:
What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones
like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then
use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of difficulties with
all of the methods I ha
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
>
> > echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local
>
> Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question
> at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the
> possibility o
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:43:50AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
>
> >>Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> >>
> >>>echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local
>
> >I said, that this can be done from the Makefile as well, if that OPTIONS
> >of yours is enabled.
>
> IMHO, octave-forge should be merged into octave itself,
> and relese version of octave and corrsponding octave-forge is old.
> I think this is a temporal situation. Once octave will be updated
> octave-forge will also be updated, and I believe octave-forge
> will be built with gcc42.
OK, in that
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local
I said, that this can be done from the Makefile as well, if that OPTIONS
of yours is enabled.
But that would violate the principle that ports shouldn't touch files in
/etc.
Selon Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> le Mer 21
nov 22:52:53 2007 :
Now that you mention it, I can see it in the diff file that you sent me.
How do you get patch to behave properly when the file it diffs
against doesn't
already exist?
If you `cd /usr/ports',
patch -p0 < /t
Hi, committer boss.
I sent 2 PRs:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118181
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118180
Please help me commit. Thanks !
--
regards.
chifeng
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Selon Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> le Mer 21 nov
22:52:53 2007 :
Now that you mention it, I can see it in the diff file that you sent me.
How do you get patch to behave properly when the file it diffs
against doesn't
already exist?
If you `cd /usr/po
The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some
new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with
that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the
fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see undefined symbols
'__mb_sb_limit', please rebuild the affected binary. Eve
Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote:
What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the
big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a
build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a
variety of difficulties with all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:24:56AM +0800, chifeng wrote:
> Hi, committer boss.
>
> I sent 2 PRs:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118181
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118180
>
> Please help me commit. Thanks !
We have Port
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:48:59 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800
> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> ... I have for some time wanted to add
> >> support to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote:
>>
>>> What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the
>>> big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a
>>> build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have ha
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Most of the message below is just rounding out the discussion. There is
> one significant question on recursion though.
Sounds good, I'll snip the bits that don't require comment.
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>> I also ended up with shared a library version problem
>>> in at
Most of the message below is just rounding out the discussion. There is
one significant question on recursion though.
Doug Barton wrote:
>> I also ended up with shared a library version problem
>> in at least one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a
>> completely vacant /usr/lo
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:13:04AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> ...
> Not all dependencies had a package built for them. For my list of 31 ports
> that I actually desired to build there was a dependency list (make
> all-depends-list) of 758 ports. Of those 758 ports there were 427 packages
>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:38:29PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some
> new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with
> that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the
> fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see undef
* Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the
> replacement is performed?
On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all
variable names in both SUB_LIST and *.in (i.e. WRAPER or something
like that, seems t
all right, thank you for your remind. :-)
chifeng.
On Nov 23, 2007 12:57 AM, Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:24:56AM +0800, chifeng wrote:
> > Hi, committer boss.
> >
> > I sent 2 PRs:
> > http://www.freebsd
23 matches
Mail list logo
