Hello.
Due to the recent vulnerabilities, the fact that a patch hasn't come out
for a while, and knowing that it's almost EOL, I'm preparing to move my
servers from php4 to php5, starting with the least critical ones.
Is there a reccomended procedure?
Something like:
"portupgrade -o lang/php5 p
Andrea Venturoli ha scritto:
"portupgrade -o lang/php5 php4" ?
It's not enough, and may cause problems.
Or:
pkg_deinstall -f php4\*
pkgdb -F
?
That's better. Remove all (php4, extensions, pecl ports, optimizers),
build php5 with all the same extensions and finally run pkgdb if you
have ot
This is a subject I've wanted to bring up for a few years now. Why I
decided to bring it up now, I don't know; I guess I just felt it was
time.
Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
editors/vim gets worse and worse as more patches are released:
icarus# cd /usr/ports/edito
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> > > # Portupgrade -a
> > > Error message:
> > >
> > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:05:46AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> > > > # Portupgrade -a
> > > > Erro
Hi,
I write this email to give my humble opinion on the scandalous status of the
linux-flashplugin9. This port is in the port tree for now 8 monthes (first
commit on the 17th of January 2007) and one should admit that it never worked. A
numerous set of mails has already been sent on this mailing l
On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I write this email to give my humble opinion on the scandalous status of the
> linux-flashplugin9. This port is in the port tree for now 8 monthes (first
> commit on the 17th of January 2007) and one should admit that it never
> worked.
[ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ]
> The port is not broken as the flash9 port is not compiled, it just
> installs the linux flash9 binary. What is broken is the linux
> emulation on FreeBSD < 7. Work is underway to improve the linux
> emulation in -CURRENT.
>
> I agree the port should
On Monday 08 October 2007 05:46:13 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:05:46AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:2
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the
> > ports tree
> > even if it does not work! (It compiles but each try to view a Flash
> > anima
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:47:57 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a subject I've wanted to bring up for a few years now. Why I
> decided to bring it up now, I don't know; I guess I just felt it was
> time.
>
> Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
> e
Quoting John Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:10:11 -0700):
>
> [ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ]
> > The port is not broken as the flash9 port is not compiled, it just
> > installs the linux flash9 binary. What is broken is the linux
> > emulation on FreeBSD < 7. Work
Jeremy Chadwick píše v po 08. 10. 2007 v 01:47 -0700:
> Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
> editors/vim gets worse and worse as more patches are released:
>
> icarus# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite && make distclean
> icarus# time make fetch
> ...
> 10.801u 3.297s 6:16
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:46:30PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500
> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the ports
> > > tree even if it does
Rather easy nspluginwrapper + Flash9 plugin in Firefox on Current and 6.2
stable. It's to some *extent* usable, but will segfault (only nspluginwrapper)
while playing videos.
Cheers, Oliver
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:15:31PM +0200, Willy Picard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:46:30PM +0100, R
Hi!
I have tried to install xorg on "clean" (no packages installed) FreeBSD
7.0-CURRENT AMD64. I have errors:
in
/usr/ports/x11/libXres
Package resourceproto was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `resourceproto.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH
Hi,
I've tested current beryl (fresh portsnap from yesterday) on -CURRENT
and found it working (using NVidia 7600 GS, it idles at 98%, even while
windows are wobbling while being moved around with KDE+Beryl), except
when I switch from KWin to Beryl, I lose window decorations (titlebar,
borders, re
18 matches
Mail list logo
