Maybe this is old news, but libusb failed for me:
(cd .libs && rm -f libusb.la && ln -s ../libusb.la libusb.la)
if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I.
-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -MT usbpp.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/usbpp.Tpo" -c -o
usbpp.lo usbpp.cpp; then
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:20:42AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> As you can notice, there are a _great_ number of syscall 454:
> % jarjarbinks:tmp$ grep -c syscall_454 strace.firefox
> % 26664
FWIW, I've checked src/sys/kern/syscalls.master and syscall_454 is
_umtx_op(). I don't think this
My testing env is Vmware, the backend disks are new/empty.
Here's my testing result:
1. OpenBSD 4.1 with iscsi-target compiled (I can't find it in the
ports)
It support disk slice directly, I use /dev/sd1c.
2. NetBSD 4.0-current with iscsi-target in base OS
It support disk slice directly, I use /
Le 23 mai 07 à 00:13, Michael Scheidell a écrit :
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Just wondering if you could use any help about this port update?
What
is the problem you are talking about? I just saw your PR but it's
already a few weeks old:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112502 An
Hi,
Despite trying to build this port with WITH_EXIMON=no in the Makefile it
seems to still require X11:
mail# make
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE
by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in
make.conf.
On the other hand, if y
Which version of FreeBSD are you using?
FreeBSD 6.x had PR threads/101355 opened on this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=101355
But it was closed with the following reason:
If your application is malloc hunger, then there is performance problem
on 6.x since malloc is prote
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:30:40AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Maybe this is old news, but libusb failed for me:
>
> (cd .libs && rm -f libusb.la && ln -s ../libusb.la libusb.la)
> if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I.
> -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Freminlins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Despite trying to build this port with WITH_EXIMON=no in the Makefile it
> seems to still require X11:
>
> mail# make
> On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE
> by itself so please help it
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Freminlins wrote:
>
> Despite trying to build this port with WITH_EXIMON=no in the Makefile it
> seems to still require X11:
>
This is a global check, it affects all ports. Just set the new X11BASE
or USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE, as advised.
--
Shaun Amott
Olivier Mueller wrote:
It has been nearly one month now since SA 3.2.0 has been released, and
the port tree is unfrozen since one or two weeks too: what about
updating the port, or why isn't this happening? Do you need more "beta
testers"? I know I can get the files/patches directly from the
Freminlins пишет:
Hi,
Despite trying to build this port with WITH_EXIMON=no in the Makefile it
seems to still require X11:
mail# make
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
X11BASE
by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in
make.conf.
On
Hi Scot,
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:51:28AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Which version of FreeBSD are you using?
Sorry, I should have said that I'm running a quite recent -CURRENT
(I have GCC 4.2).
> FreeBSD 6.x had PR threads/101355 opened on this problem:
>
> http://
Benjamin Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice that with X.org 7.2, many more fonts are installed by default.
> This includes many fonts that are probably very rarely used by most
> people, like font-misc-ethiopic. I would prefer not to have those fonts
> installed on my system. Simply pk
Hi
merits /demerits of alternatives:
Currently Running freebsd 6.1 and given the need to upgrade to 6.2.
Is there any advantage in upgrading the system to 6.2 before upgrading Xorg or
should I do it the other way round.
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
Hello all,
This is my first submission.
Just thought it would be nice to have ekiga (http://www.gnomemeeting.org/)
updated to 2.0.9 there's been a load of bugfixes since 2.04.
Same goes for kphone which seems to be an unsupported port. There seems
to be a lot in common between the new kphone SI an
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yuri Pankov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:30:40AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > Maybe this is old news, but libusb failed for me:
: >
: > (cd .libs && rm -f libusb.la && ln -s ../libusb.la libusb.la)
: > if /bin/sh /usr/loca
On Wed, 30 May 2007 22:08:16 -0600 (MDT)
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I set out on the great 7.2 upgrade, but didn't get very far:
>
> sudo portupgrade -f -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade
> ...
> ===> Cleaning for portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5
> ---> Clea
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> merits /demerits of alternatives:
> Currently Running freebsd 6.1 and given the need to upgrade to 6.2.
>
> Is there any advantage in upgrading the system to 6.2 before upgrading
> Xorg or should I do it the other way round.
Upgrading to 6.2 first mak
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:48:06PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>Please Cc: me when replying.
> >>>
> >>>I can't b
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >
> >You can compare to the log from pointyhat to try and find the
> >difference and backtrack to the cause.
BTW, this went away after a rebuild, so I guess a gremlin got loose in
the b
Reporting some problems.
Based on how things got installed the start script at
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ossec-hids Points to the wrong 'command' and
'required_files'.
command="/usr/local/bin/ossec-control"
Whereas 'ossec-control' got installed at '/usr/local/ossec-hids/bin'
And
required_files="/u
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:18:56PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Jeremie Le Hen, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Nonetheless, this PR reminds me that libpthread switched from libkse
> to libthr. I'm going to try libkse when I'll be back home in a
> couple of hours and I will send a follow-up here. Event
Hi all,
(I've cross-posted to -x11@ since it appears this problem is related
to X.org, not Firefox.)
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:18:56PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Nonetheless, this PR reminds me that libpthread switched from libkse
> to libthr. I'm going to try libkse when I'll be back home
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:54:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:29:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>On all my machines (both current and stable) that I've initiated the
> >>xorg mega upgrade I'm seeing:
> >>mak
Hi,
I`ve cvsuped ports as of yesterday 2007.05.31 and after portupgrade gnucash
does not compile:
===> gnucash-2.0.5_4 depends on shared library: ktoblzcheck.4 - not found
===>Verifying install for ktoblzcheck.4 in /usr/ports/finance/ktoblzcheck
===> Returning to build of gnucash-2.0.5_4
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:58:36AM +0200, Momchil Ivanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I`ve cvsuped ports as of yesterday 2007.05.31 and after portupgrade gnucash
> does not compile:
>
> ===> gnucash-2.0.5_4 depends on shared library: ktoblzcheck.4 - not found
> ===>Verifying install for ktoblzcheck.4
The following reply was made to PR ports/11320; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dfilter service)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/11320: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:23:41 + (UTC)
simokawa2007-06-01 00:23:34 UTC
FreeBSD src repo
On Friday 01 June 2007 02:30:09 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The error indicates you forgot to a) make clean to remove stale
> ktoblzcheck build directory, b) upgrade that port first.
>
> Kris
This fixes the problem for me, it compiles and runs after that
--- Makefile.orig Fri Jun 1 02:02:25 200
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:40:50AM +0200, Momchil Ivanov wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 02:30:09 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > The error indicates you forgot to a) make clean to remove stale
> > ktoblzcheck build directory, b) upgrade that port first.
> >
> > Kris
>
> This fixes the problem for me, it
On Friday 01 June 2007 02:45:12 Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> OK, your log just didn't show that being the problem :)
>
> Kris
Maybe should have explained my thoughts:
Error: shared library "ktoblzcheck.4" does not exist
as I saw that I checked what the ktoblzcheck port installs and it installs
vers
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You can compare to the log from pointyhat to try and find the
difference and backtrack to the cause.
BTW, this went away after a rebuild, so I
PR filled: ports/113208
--
PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B
Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E 158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B
pgp8eP3d6RWPK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
Warner
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
T
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:21:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> my portupgrade -a died in the middle. Well, the laptop in my battery died
> at a bad time. all of my +CONTENTS files are gone. Is there any hope?
I just had a deja-vu. They must be changing something in the Matrix ;-)
http://lists.f
34 matches
Mail list logo
