On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:49:02AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time,
> but it's the only way.
"long time" = "2 weeks"
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:49:02AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time,
>> but it's the only way.
>
> "long time" = "2 weeks"
>
> mcl
The last time I requested a maintainer time out it was something like tw
I've only changed over to BSD recently and I'm attempting to get away from
microsoft altogether.I downloaded PC BSD it's up and running and I'm pretty
happy with it.
I needed to get hold of stock charting software which I discovered in your
ports\finance\qtstalker, I installed the program, start
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:23:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> The last time I requested a maintainer time out it was something like
> two months.
I have been much more active in the last few months on enforcing the
maintainer-timeouts.
If you are having problems, please email portmgr@ directly
Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in
my cvsup'd port tree...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
One question: will the ports still be accessible via git after the merge
of modular xorg branch ?
I started to like git very much (as a distribution tool), it seems to be
much faster than cvsup.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
2007/5/8, Ken Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in
my cvsup'd port tree...
Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
look at http://git.
From: "Rene Ladan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
> look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
> goes on.
No, "http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg"; says;
--Quote--
Disclaimer
If you read about the git reposito
Ken Yamada wrote:
> From: "Rene Ladan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
>> look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
>> goes on.
>
> No, "http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg"; says;
>
> --Quote--
> Disclaimer
>
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 16:32 +1000 schrieb Brad McIntosh:
> I've only changed over to BSD recently and I'm attempting to get away from
> microsoft altogether.I downloaded PC BSD it's up and running and I'm pretty
> happy with it.
> I needed to get hold of stock charting software which I dis
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:02 +0200 schrieb [LoN]Kamikaze:
> Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 20:12 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Sedov:
> >> On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:26 +0200
> >> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >>
> >>> Hello list,
> >>>
> >>> I've tar'ed and g
Thank you, Florent.
I understand that we need to be patient another two days...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>compat3x-port didn't stopped.
The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000. 3.x support has
long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
holes in the co
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
>
> The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000. 3.x support has
> long si
Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
>> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
>>
>> The last FreeBSD 3.x release
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:35 -0400 schrieb Lowell Gilbert:
> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> >> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > The port wouldn't be necessary whe
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:51:46PM +0200, Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:35 -0400 schrieb Lowell Gilbert:
> > Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> > >> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Ti
Geno Salvati schrieb:
> Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
> include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1. The answer to this question is not
> mission critical but will make a slight difference in my planning if you
> are able to provide it.
I've already submitted the update
On 5/8/07, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geno Salvati schrieb:
> Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
> include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1. The answer to this question is not
> mission critical but will make a slight difference in my planning if you
> ar
On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
anymore to use audio/mbrola as a nat
I don't think this has been discussed before (or if it has, I can't find
any references to it). I'm also not sure if this should go to ports@ or
doc@ or bin@ or what...
There are some of us who use weekly_catman_enable="yes" in periodic.conf
to rebuild pre-formatted manpages once a week. I thoug
Scot Hetzel schrieb:
On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
anymore to use
Hello Ports!
u. PLEASE!?
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Main_Page
Thank you!
Paul Pathiakis
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECT
Matthias,
Thank you for your good work with the OpenVPN ports.
I have been using them for years and they have always been reliable.
Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1. The answer to this question is not
mission critical
On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scot Hetzel schrieb:
> On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
>> of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>> compat3x-port didn'
I've already submitted a pr with the update; before I read about the
maintainer timeout; should I just wait it out a while, and if nothing
happens, request one? Or do it right away?
+++ [LoN]Kamikaze [freebsd] [08/05/07 07:49 +0200]:
Sam Stein wrote:
There is a new version out; the port has an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm assuming someone has been able to get it to compile, but without any
knowledge in C++, I'm stump'd ... if I try to build, its failing at
StreamingLoadTool:
StreamingLoadTool.cpp: In function `int main(int, char**)':
StreamingLoadTool.cpp:132: er
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> One question: will the ports still be accessible via git after the merge
> of modular xorg branch ?
> I started to like git very much (as a distribution tool), it seems to be
> much faster than cvsup.
Probably not, at least not the xorg branch. I'm hosting this tree on a
pers
Hi,
I have some patches for Docbook DSSSL stylesheets in order to support
Mongolian. I have sent my patches to Docbook/DSSSL maintainers and received
following response:
"Hi,
I checked in your update for mn.xml. It should appear in the next
snapshot of the XSL stylesheets.
Regarding the DSSSL pa
At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
> Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in
> /usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?
>
> I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but
> no response from him.
Sorry. Of cource I can integrate your pa
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in
/usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?
I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but
no response from him.
Sorry. Of cource I
I have been noticing that when I run 'portupgrade -Ppa' (or reasonable
variants thereof) on a system that contains:
/etc/make.conf:
...
DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 41
WANT_MYSQL_VER= 41
WITH_MYSQL_VER= 41
(I used to just use DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=41 and that didn't seem to be
enough.
32 matches
Mail list logo
