Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ .
In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile
problems, which currently has 238 bad ports, is
http://people.freebsd.org/~f
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
I'm running into an error (seen below) when attempting to build the
latest net/rrdtool when Ruby is installed.
A first step would be adding the ruby module to the port, see the
attached dif
Hi friend !
You have just received a postcard from someone who cares about you!
This is a part of the message:
"Hy there! It has been a long time since I haven't heared about you!
I've just found out about this service from Claire, a friend of mine
who also told me that..."
If
Dear Sirs
I downloaded ksubeditor and now I don't know nothing about it.
How to install?
What are the system requirements?
Does it work with windows Xp home Edition?
Please if you can tell me something.
Best Regards,
Maria
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
Hi friend !
You have just received a postcard from someone who cares about you!
This is a part of the message:
"Hy there! It has been a long time since I haven't heared about you!
I've just found out about this service from Claire, a friend of mine
who also told me that..."
If
Hi friend !
You have just received a postcard from someone who cares about you!
This is a part of the message:
"Hy there! It has been a long time since I haven't heared about you!
I've just found out about this service from Claire, a friend of mine
who also told me that..."
If
On Monday 07 May 2007 08:44:01 am José Freitas wrote:
> Dear Sirs
> I downloaded ksubeditor and now I don't know nothing about it.
> How to install?
# cd /usr/ports/multimedia/ksubeditor
# maje install clean
> What are the system requirements?
You also need to have the following packages install
Thank you all for the report.
I will surely fix that after ports thaw...
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:20:21PM +0200, Steve Clement wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> >
> >>I'm running into an error (seen below) whe
Hello list,
I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. It fetches the *.tar.gz
and so on.
But during the "make install" he asks for a Makefile (I think
PORTNAME/work/DISTNAME/Makefile) but there is no Makefile because it i
On 5/7/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello list,
I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. It fetches the *.tar.gz
and so on.
But during the "make install" he asks for a Makefile (I think
PORTNAME/work/D
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 10:54 -0500 schrieb Scot Hetzel:
> On 5/7/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
> > Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. It fetches the *.tar.gz
> > and so on.
The ports tree has been frozen for the modular xorg merge, so there's no chance
of a
version bump going in ATM, but are you working on upgrading the port to 0.22.4?
A simple
PORTVERSION bump seems to work, but I'm not familiar with the local patches so
know if
there would be any issues, and of c
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
Good news that this is moving forward! Congrats to all
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
> >are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
> >huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:26 +0200
Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Hello list,
>
> I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
> Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. It fetches the *.tar.gz
> and so on.
>
> But during the "make install" he asks
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to
I'm getting the following when trying to compile unrealircd:
Building src
/usr/local/bin/ccache gcc -I../include -I/usr/ports/irc/unreal/work/
Unreal3.2/extras/regexp/include -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe
-DNO_IDEA -funsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -DZIP_LINKS -export-
dynamic -L/
I tried to use port 'lapack' and found that many symbols are only in libblas.a
that isn't installed.
So it should be installed along with libblas.so.
Thanx,
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:00:10 -0500
Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|I'm getting the following when trying to compile unrealircd:
|
|
|I attempted to submit a pr on this with send-pr, but never got a
|reply back...
not quite correct :).
F
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:00:10PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I'm getting the following when trying to compile unrealircd:
This has been discussed before. Please see the below thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg05997.html
--
| Jeremy Chadwick
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 20:12 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Sedov:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:26 +0200
> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
> > Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. I
On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:42:31 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
>are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade.
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
> >saves old shared libraries across updates (I sent you email about this
> >a while ago), which is a vital safety and robustness mechanism.
>
> I am one of peo
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
>saves old shared libraries across updates (I sent you email about this
>a while
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >
> >>>No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
>
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:44:14PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > >
I just installed acroread7-7.0.9,1 from ports on a new FreeBSD 6.2-p3
system.
It will not run, when I attempt to run it from the command line, I get
the following error:
:~> acroread
ELF binary type "3" not known.
ldconfig: illegal option -- p
usage: ldconfig [-32] [-aout | -elf] [-Rimrsv] [-
On Mon 07 May 2007 13:05, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> I just installed acroread7-7.0.9,1 from ports on a new FreeBSD 6.2-p3 system.
>
> It will not run, when I attempt to run it from the command line, I get the
> following error:
>
> :~> acroread
> ELF binary type "3" not known.
> ldconfig: illega
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:44:14 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>>>
Le Lun 7 mai 07 à 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
> the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
> depends on them as well. For example the gettext upgrade got triggered
>
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ?crivait?:
>
> > The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
> > the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
>
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ?crivait?:
>
> > The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
> > the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
>
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:02:52PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:44:14 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >>On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:26 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >>>I dispute the correctness of this entry. The old libraries in
> > >>>lib/compat/pkg are not linked to directly by new builds. The only
> > >>>situation in which something might end up being linked to 2 versions
> > >>>of the library i
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:34:36PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:26 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >>>I dispute the correctness of this entry. The old libraries in
> > > >>>lib/compat/pkg are not linked to directly by new builds. The only
> > > >>>situation in whic
There is a new version out; the port has an old one, the new version works
fine; I've emailed the maintainer twice; no reply.. what should I do now?
--
Sam Stein
Computer Technician/Programmer
b1tt3r
pgp0oHmyM5NY7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>Ok, no worries then. I have no plans to add that
feature at this time,
>partly because there has been no user demand for it,
and mostly
>because I don't like the idea. I recognize however
that reasonable
>minds may differ on that topic.
if you don't like the idea, that's fine, but since you
sa
Sam Stein wrote:
> There is a new version out; the port has an old one, the new version works
> fine; I've emailed the maintainer twice; no reply.. what should I do now?
Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time, but
it's the only way.
_
Brian Gruber wrote:
Ok, no worries then. I have no plans to add that
feature at this time,
partly because there has been no user demand for it,
and mostly
because I don't like the idea. I recognize however
that reasonable
minds may differ on that topic.
if you don't like the idea, that's
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 20:12 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Sedov:
>> On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:26 +0200
>> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
>>> Makefile like the Port
41 matches
Mail list logo