On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:39:35AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> All functions in subj. now conforms to Open Group specs and POSIX.
> I believe I fix all obsoleted and hack places in our tree which uses
> old behaviour. The ports system is under consideration.
>
> Please send any problems you'll
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that.
Anyone who interested in POSIX can dig out what changes and how
through cvs
Hello,
I have problem with the new pear version from ports. Tried to upgrade it
using portupgrade but it fails. Then I tried to make deinstall it but it
said it doesn't exist and then I tried to make install clean but I get
that error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make install clean
===> Installing for pea
All:
Is anyone else having problems building libogg/libvorbis from the ports?
I am getting a patch error since I updated my ports collection this morning.
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting for libvorbis-1.1.2,3
=> MD5 Checksum OK for libvorbis-1.1.2.tar.gz.
=
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Tue Apr 17 09:47:03 WST 2007
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone tell me why /var/tmp/INDEX-7.db is getting updated _every_ single
> time a run ports_glob(1) ? E.G.
>
> #ports_glob "*wifi*"
> [Updating the portsdb in /var/tmp ... - 16938 port
Harald Schmalzbauer escribió:
Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2007 schrieb Andrey Chernov:
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continu
On Tue, 01 May 2007 12:59:10 -0500, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
All:
Is anyone else having problems building libogg/libvorbis from the ports?
Fixed, my mistake.
Cheers,
Mezz
I am getting a patch error since I updated my ports collection this
morning.
===> Vulnerability che
No worries...Thanks man!
A
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2007 12:59:10 -0500, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> All:
>>
>> Is anyone else having problems building libogg/libvorbis from the ports?
>
> Fixed, my mistake.
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
>> I am getting a patch error s
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gstreamer-plugins-dts-0.10.4_1,3:
"/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/multimedia/libdts" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
===> multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-dts failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erw
Hi
I was inquiring when the port for 2.5 might be available?
Thanks
Ed
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:04:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
> make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER [re]install do install a second port (duplicate)
>
> is this a bug or do I have some problem on this machine?
>
> 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 27 20:46:32 BRT 2007
>
> portsnap update I did toda
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..vlc-0.8.6.b_1,2:
"/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/multimedia/libdts" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
===> multimedia/vlc failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error code 1
I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
key ports like don't seen to support this option
even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
deleting files.
I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
Repro steps:
cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
make install
ls -l /usr/local/bin/perl*
-rwx
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:12:54AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
> key ports like don't seen to support this option
> even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
> deleting files.
>
> I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
DESTDIR
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:29PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> I'm not sure what you want to hear but to clarify
What I meant was: when you are trying to report an error you usually
need to show exactly what is going wrong, because just describing it
vaguely does not often help, because we have to tr
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 19:09:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:04:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER [re]install do install a second port
> > (duplicate)
> >
> > is this a bug or do I have some problem on this machine?
> >ify
> > 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Tue Apr 17 09:47:03 WST 2007
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me why /var/tmp/INDEX-7.db is getting updated _every_ single
time a run ports_glob(1) ? E.G.
#ports_glob "*wifi*"
[Updating the portsdb in /var/tmp ... - 1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:29PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I'm not sure what you want to hear but to clarify
What I meant was: when you are trying to report an error you usually
need to show exactly what is going wrong, because just describing it
vaguely does not often help,
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
0n Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:54:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>INDEX-7.db isn't located in /var/tmp though by default >_>..
Ok, thats what it is then. Simple question:
How would it have ended up in there ?
If I remove it and do a pkgdb -u It puts it back there.
-aW
IMPORTANT: This
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:54:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>INDEX-7.db isn't located in /var/tmp though by default >_>..
Ok, thats what it is then. Simple question:
How would it have ended up in there ?
If I remove it and do a pkgdb -u It puts it back there
On Tue, 01 May 2007 20:56:59 -0500, Garrett Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:29PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I'm not sure what you want to hear but to clarify
What I meant was: when you are trying to report an error you usually
need to show ex
Steven Hartland wrote:
> I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
> key ports like don't seen to support this option
> even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
> deleting files.
>
> I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
I don't see DESTIR mentioned in ports(7) or in the
23 matches
Mail list logo