Re: Thunderbird 2.0 coming to ports today, any need for Thunderbird 1.5?

Michael Johnson wrote: Hello, I'm pleased to announce we are going to import Thunderbird 2.0 to ports later today, we don't plan on repo-coping mail/thunderbird -> mail/thunderbird15 unless there is a high demand for it. If you want Thunderbird 1.5 to stay in ports then please speak up! Mich

Re: Thunderbird 2.0 coming to ports today, any need for Thunderbird 1.5?

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Michael Johnson wrote: Hello, I'm pleased to announce we are going to import Thunderbird 2.0 to ports later today, we don't plan on repo-coping mail/thunderbird -> mail/thunderbird15 unless there is a high demand for it. If you want Thunderbird 1.5 to stay in ports then p

Re: Mailman GID problem

Jeffrey Goldberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 20/04/2007 at 23:59 wrote: > From /usr/local/share/doc/mailman/mailman-install.txt > > In section 6.1.1 Integrating Postfix and Mailman > > > * When you configure Mailman, use the --with-mail-gid=mailman > switch; > > However, the current

Unfetchable distfiles reminder

Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 242 bad ports, is http://people.freebsd.org/~f

Re: Mailman GID problem

On Saturday 21 April 2007 02:20:10 Guy Brand wrote: > Jeffrey Goldberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 20/04/2007 at 23:59 wrote: > > From /usr/local/share/doc/mailman/mailman-install.txt > > > > In section 6.1.1 Integrating Postfix and Mailman > > > > > > * When you configure Mailman, use the --wit

Greylisting - recomendation pls using postfix

Hi Suggestions please for a choice of port for implementing greylisting on a server running a number of mailists and acting as a mailserver for around 10 websites. Ease of configuration and maintenance plus low server load are important considerations. Thanks in advance david ___

Re: Greylisting - recomendation pls using postfix

David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Suggestions please for a choice of port for implementing greylisting on a > server running a number of mailists and acting as a mailserver for around 10 > websites. > > Ease of configuration and maintenance plus low server load are important > co

Re: Greylisting - recomendation pls using postfix

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 04:18:21AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: > Suggestions please for a choice of port for implementing greylisting on a > server running a number of mailists and acting as a mailserver for around 10 > websites. mail/postgrey is what we run on our heavy loaded SMTP servers.

outdated PEAR ports?

Hi, I need to install several packages from PEAR, among which are MDB2, LiveUser. The problem is that the named packages are a bit outdated: PEAR port: 1.5.0_1 upstream: 1.5.2 MDB2 port: 2.3.0 upstream: 2.4.0 LiveUser port 0.15.1 upstream: 0.16.2 etc. etc. I could continue this list easily. Som

Re: Greylisting - recomendation pls using postfix

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 04:18:21AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > Suggestions please for a choice of port for implementing greylisting on a > server running a number of mailists and acting as a mailserver for around 10 > websites. > > Ease of configuration and maintenance plus low serv

Libs

Hi, Peter! While I tried to configure VSFTPD-server, I've get a problem. I Can't find anywhere the libs pam_ftp.so pam_unix2.so pam_shells.so pam_unix2.so pam_unix2.so pam_unix2.so These libs are needed to configure virtual users. Can you help me to find t

Re: outdated PEAR ports?

Quoting rihad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I need to install several packages from PEAR, among which are MDB2, LiveUser. The problem is that the named packages are a bit outdated: PEAR port: 1.5.0_1 upstream: 1.5.2 MDB2 port: 2.3.0 upstream: 2.4.0 LiveUser port 0.15.1 upstream: 0.16.2 You can

Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: net/py-pypcap

I think this port should be gone as it's now part of py-pcs. Best, George ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Mailman GID problem

On Apr 21, 2007, at 12:46 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: Clearly that last part is wrong. bash-2.05b# ls -lsa /usr/local/mailman/data/aliases* 6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root mailman 4383 Oct 14 2005 /usr/local/ mailman/data/aliases 4 -rw-r- 1 mailman mailman 3984 Sep 8 2005 /usr/local/ mailman

Re: Mailman GID problem

--On April 21, 2007 3:33:08 AM -0700 David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lastly the standard make ./configure does not work with mailman neither is there a record available which enables one to check the current settings including GID applicable to the installed version. This means that

Re: Thunderbird 2.0 coming to ports today, any need for Thunderbird 1.5?

On 12/23/-58 20:59, Michael Johnson wrote: Hello, I'm pleased to announce we are going to import Thunderbird 2.0 to ports later today, we don't plan on repo-coping mail/thunderbird -> mail/thunderbird15 unless there is a high demand for it. If you want Thunderbird 1.5 to stay in ports then ple

Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: sysutils/seatools

Hi Bill! On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:03:31 GMT Bill "distfiles" Fenner wrote: > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could > you please visit > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > an

Re: Mailman GID problem

On Saturday 21 April 2007 08:50:41 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On April 21, 2007 3:33:08 AM -0700 David Southwell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lastly the standard make ./configure does not work with mailman neither > > is there a record available which enables one to check the current > > settin