Hello!
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
And yes, I can just replace
# REQUIRE: DAEMON
# BEFORE: LOGIN
with
# REQUIRE: LOGIN
in apache.sh, and all works correctly. Yet I prefer (as usually in
open-source
software wo
This started around the late 1.5.0.x versions and also happens in FF 2.0
When saving a file, e.g. an e-mail attachment, right-click->Save Link
As... on a webpage, or uploading a file to a web forum, it will work
once - maybe twice - but on subsequent saves the dialogue opens but the
cursor sta
On 12/7/06, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This started around the late 1.5.0.x versions and also happens in FF 2.0
When saving a file, e.g. an e-mail attachment, right-click->Save Link
As... on a webpage, or uploading a file to a web forum, it will work
once - maybe twice - but on subseq
It looks like both ports install some similar
files into share/ghostscript/8.15, in particular
share/ghostscript/8.15/lib/gs_init.ps.
Frank, could you please look at it or should I
mark the two ports as conflicting right away?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ .
In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile
problems, which currently has 223 bad ports, is
http://people.freebsd.org/~f
On Thursday 07 December 2006 16:00, Bill "distfiles" Fenner wrote:
> Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
> You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port
> whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could
> you please visit
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:10:05 +, James Seward wrote
> On 12/7/06, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had this behaviour on 6.2-PRERELEASE.
Exactly the same bug at home on a 6.2-PRERELEASE :/
Ganaël LAPLANCHE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.martymac.com
___
wreckage of a very armed and deadly machine-you did?, nod yes-good.
be less trouble to them if I were safely dead. And there were only
pull the swaying bodies back to the deck.
vanished. I was wiping my lips with the back of my hand when Ljotur
of costume but playing from a wheelchair. If this was
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > >> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > >> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing
mato wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
>
> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
> mato wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e43
mato wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>> mato wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
>>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
>>> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
>>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 12:45 +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> It looks like both ports install some similar
> files into share/ghostscript/8.15, in particular
> share/ghostscript/8.15/lib/gs_init.ps.
>
> Frank, could you please look at it or should I
> mark the two ports as conflicting right away?
I have had this problem since the update to the gnome 2.16 libs. I
have had problems with firefox, thunderbird and eclipse crashing. On
thunderbird this seems to happen most to me when attaching files from
the file directory browser window.
ganael.laplanche wrote:
On Thu, 7 De
Guys, more of 'me too' are so useless. Please make your bug report useful.
marcus is still waiting for someone to fill out his request[1]. I can't
fill out his request, because I still can't reproduce it on two systems.
If I can reproduce it then his request will be complete, because all o
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> mato wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>>
>>> mato wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote c
On 12/07/06 00:14, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 07/12/2006, at 4:02 PM, Eric Schuele wrote:
Hello,
Off topic? Maybe.
I'm trying to build some software that has a port... yet the code I'm
attempting to build is a *later* cvs snapshot.
I'm trying to build it using the instructions on the origina
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:40:49PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:08:45PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 05, 2006, at 13:59 , Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > >Wesley Shields wrote:
> > >>>@comment DISTFILE:$filename:$size:$md5:$sha256
> > >
> > >I think that's good,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:16:18PM +0100, mato wrote:
>
> Matthew, that is a great answer!!
> Thank you! :-)
>
> The last question would be how to make make(1) /portupgrade/portsystem
> to ignore FORBIDDEN.
>
"make -DNO_IGNORE" will get around this. But bypassing FORBIDDEN is
generally not wise
On 2006-12-07 10:05 +, "Bill \"distfiles\" Fenner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
# Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
#
# You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port
# whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could
# you please visit
#
# http://people.freebsd.org/~fe
We are running into a fairly annoying bug in trac 0.10.2 that has
been fixed in 0.10-stable. Would it be possible for the port to be
upgraded to include these patches? Our issues are with ticket
#4132. They can be seen here: http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.10.3
Thank you,
Doug Penny
Wesley Shields wrote:
> Part 2 (the bsd.port.mk piece) is the patch posted by Doug with Ade's
> suggestions.
You missed the second patch I sent with the ${file%:*} changes. I've
attached a modified version of that patch which incorporates Ade's
change.
I plan to start adding the DISTFILE string
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:56:57 +0200
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> x11/ecore
> - Fix the packing list for the !x11 case.
>
Thanks for fixing the pkg-plist;-) Stupid error.
--
Stanislav Sedov
http://people.freebsd.org/~stas/stas.key.asc
pgpJjNJ8ta4q3.pgp
Description: PGP signat
Hello,
was released the stable version 1.1.1 some months ago. When you are going t o
update the port?
Bye,
Giovanni
pgp8ABOeS1e5y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:56:57PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> - Not sure how to proceed with the PORTREVISION here, and also in
> www/pecl-pecl_http - it seems that it is not customary for a PHP extension
> to have a different PORTREVISION from the main port?
Patch for pecl-pecl_http looks
Doug Barton wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
>
>> Part 2 (the bsd.port.mk piece) is the patch posted by Doug with Ade's
>> suggestions.
>
> You missed the second patch I sent with the ${file%:*} changes.
One more for fun. :) I was looking through bsd.port.mk for another
purpose tonight and came ac
26 matches
Mail list logo
