Re: stale dependencies and portupgrade

2006-11-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Vivek Khera wrote: > Example: p5-Expect used to depend on p5-IO-Stty which was removed from > ports recently. rt36 depends on p5-Expect, so got a transitive > dependency to this dead port. Upgrading p5-Expect using "portupgrade > -Rr" took care of the direct dependency, but the upstream ports st

Re: stale dependencies and portupgrade

2006-11-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Just give a head up, if you are going to use 'portmaster -s' then make > sure you do not use pkgdb. The pkgdb kill 'portmaster -s' function. I > have requested to sem if he can gets pkgdb to not remove an empty of > +REQUIRED_BY, but he hasn't answer back yet for months. I

Re: xorg 7.x and non-standard X11BASE

2006-11-29 Thread IOnut
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:47:28 +0600 Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I received a bunch of port build failure logs wrt. move to Xorg 7.x. > > I would like to know if there is known easy way to reproduce build > failures with Xorg 7.x. The new misc/tinderbox that I'll commit tonight

Re: xorg 7.x and non-standard X11BASE

2006-11-29 Thread Florent Thoumie
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Joel Dahl wrote: >>> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:24 +, Florent Thoumie wrote: Doug Barton wrote: > Currently we have 2 locations for files installed by ports. LOCALBASE > (which defaults to

Ntop install failes on FBSD 6.1-P10 system

2006-11-29 Thread FreeBSD-Ports
Hello list, I tried to install the Ntop port on a FreeBSD 6.1-Release-P10 system, but without succes. The faults I get are not happening with the installation of other ports on this system. I have also done buildworld several times succesfully on this system. The FreeBSD version [EMAIL PROTECTED

[PATCH] audio/zinf-esound: [added ipv6 category ]

2006-11-29 Thread Janos Mohacsi
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Janos Mohacsi >Organization: NIIF/HUNGARNET >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [PATCH] audio/zinf-esound: [added ipv6 category ] >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: change-request >Release: Fr

[PATCH] ftp/lukemftp: [ipv6 category added ]

2006-11-29 Thread Janos Mohacsi
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Janos Mohacsi >Organization: NIIF/HUNGARNET >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [PATCH] ftp/lukemftp: [ipv6 category added ] >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: change-request >Release: FreeBSD

Re: [PATCH] audio/zinf-esound: [added ipv6 category ]

2006-11-29 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:17:11 +0100 (CET) Janos Mohacsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > >Submitter-Id:current-users > >Originator: Janos Mohacsi > >Organization:NIIF/HUNGARNET > >Confidential:no > >Synopsis:[PATCH] audio/zinf-esound: [added ipv6 category ] > >Severity:

Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean

2006-11-29 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:14:41 -0500 Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > = I don't think trying to use multiple threads at the same time. > = But if applications use libthr, libraries must use libthr, too. > You are right about the dangers of mixing different thread implement

Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean

2006-11-29 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 09:06, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: = > but library may also be not using threads _at all_. -lm, for example, is = > happily used by many threaded programs without itself being thread-aware. = = I understand your ideal, think so too.  However, in fact, it is =

Re: stale dependencies and portupgrade

2006-11-29 Thread Vivek Khera
On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:46 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I suppose the bug is that I expected portupgrade -Rr to recompute the dependency lists of the upstream ports to take into account any changing dependencies of the updated port. portupgrade -Rr do not recompute dependencies. It do port

Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean

2006-11-29 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 29 November 2006 09:06, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > = > but library may also be not using threads _at all_. -lm, for example, is > = > happily used by many threaded programs without itself being thread-aware. > = > = I understan

ripenc error

2006-11-29 Thread Yves Guérin
Dear Sir, I get this error when try to change the cddb query method to wget RipEnc version 1.1, Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001 Michael J. Parmeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RipEnc comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY There is currently NO encoding process running in the background There is no encode.lo

Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean

2006-11-29 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 10:45, Lowell Gilbert wrote: = ICU is different in that not only can it be called from multiple = threads, but those threads can (in theory -- as far as I know, you're = right that nobody uses this capability right now) be interacting. =   = > You are (slightly) pessim

Re: xfce 4.4 RC2 - patchset 08

2006-11-29 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Oliver Lehmann wrote: > here comes the 4.4 RC2 patchset: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/xfce4.4_ports_08.tar.bz2 > > Make sure you don't have any by-hand or by former patches modified xfce > ports - otherwise the patch will fail. I tested both the patch and the > share with a clean c

Re: ripenc error

2006-11-29 Thread Shaun Amott
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:49:07AM -0500, Yves Gurin wrote: > > I get this error when try to change the cddb query method to wget > > RipEnc version 1.1, Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001 Michael J. Parmeley > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RipEnc comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY > > There is currently NO

Re: [syslog-ng] sysutils/syslog-ng/files/syslong-ng.sh.in patch

2006-11-29 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
> * of alcohol. >:} > Betsy was a Himalayan Mountain Goat, and I'm the Sherpa. ~BAS > Ahh. That explains the jpeg of you and the llamas. :) -- Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis

Re: $snmpd_flush_cache for Net-SNMP ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/files/snmpd.sh.in

2006-11-29 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
I filed PR: ports/106036 Feel free to close when the 5.3.x update rolls out to the public I know that the Net-SNMP people have been bugging me to to test new patches on FreeBSD and NetBSD, but I'm so stretched for time as it is that I barely have time to submit little PRs like this. ~BAS On

Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean

2006-11-29 Thread David Xu
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:52, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Since nothing is using ICU in a multi-threaded fashion _right now_, the > current version of the port builds without threads by default. Norikatsu > confirms, he is not calling into ICU from multiple threads either, hence my > suggestio

Non-email contributors?

2006-11-29 Thread Wes Peters
I want to record the contributor for the port I've just added, but they don't have an email address, just a web site. Does the following look kosher? --- contrib.additional.sgml 16 Nov 2006 00:09:42 - 1.641 +++ contrib.additional.sgml 30 Nov 2006 00:30:18 - @@ -9830,6 +9830,

x11-toolkits/pango build error

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Ovens
x11-toolkits/pango fails with an error about glib-mkenums not found. glib is up to date. Has anyone else had this, and what is the solution? Nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING and I can't find anything in this mailing list either. Thanks. Regards, Mark config.status: executing pango/module-def

x11base error using portmanager.

2006-11-29 Thread ksu92me
FreeBeastie# portsnap fetch update && portsdb -fu && portsclean -CD Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 2 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Wed Nov 29 01:37:37 CST 2006 to Wed Nov 29 17:29:17 CST 2006. F

Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5

2006-11-29 Thread Tim Clewlow
Hello, I have azureus-2.5.0.0 which requires diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_1 to build (among other things). It builds and runs fine, however, azureus limps along for about 10 minutes with very low download and upload speeds, then it seems to grind to a halt, the d/l and u/l basically stop. There are no e

Re: openoffice-2-devel compile error on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-11-29 Thread Oliver Lehmann
NAKATA Maho wrote: > Please expect openoffice.org-2 and openoffice.org-2-RC ports are > amd64 friendly. (still can be broken, though) Just I'm use i386 machine Just wanted to say, that I now tried openoffice.org-2.1.20061123 on my amd64, and after 5:30h the port was successfully compiled and inst

Re: xorg 7.x and non-standard X11BASE

2006-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:19:01AM -0500, Parv wrote: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote Doug Barton thusly... > > > > When xorg 7 is imported, it will be installing into /usr/local. > > Shortly thereafter the plan is to do away with the X11BASE stuff > > altogether, and have all ports insta

Re: stale dependencies and portupgrade

2006-11-29 Thread Doug Barton
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> Just give a head up, if you are going to use 'portmaster -s' then make >> sure you do not use pkgdb. The pkgdb kill 'portmaster -s' function. I >> have requested to sem if he can gets pkgdb to not remove an empty of >> +REQUIRED_BY, but he hasn'

Re: Non-email contributors?

2006-11-29 Thread Vasil Dimov
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:47:53PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: > I want to record the contributor for the port I've just added, but they don't > have an email address, just a web site. Does the following look kosher? > > --- contrib.additional.sgml 16 Nov 2006 00:09:42 - 1.641 > +++ co

Re: DESTDIR problems ...

2006-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Vincent Blondel wrote: > > Hello, > > I just finalized a Makefile making a complete apache jail machine. For > this I used a common > > 'make DESTDIR=jail_path install clean' > > But I noticed this does not work with all ports. For info, these package

Re: xorg 7.x and non-standard X11BASE

2006-11-29 Thread IOnut
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:42:34 +0200 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:47:28 +0600 > Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I received a bunch of port build failure logs wrt. move to Xorg 7.x. > > > > I would like to know if there is known