On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> bsd# eboard
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgmodule12.so.3" not found,
> required by "libgdk_imlib.so.5"
> bsd#
Reinstall graphics/imlib
--
Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[[Рос
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:42:41 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote
> On 10/15/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello and thanks for your hard work!
> >
> > I've been using WITH_GECKO=seamonkey (and WITH_MOZILLA=seamonkey) and
> > now when trying to install new Gnome (after uninstalling nearly
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> > Please fix any errors as soon as possible.
> >
> > - *print/pdflib* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: pdflib-7.0.0_1 < pdflib-7.0.0p1
>
> 7.0.0p1 wasn't fetchable, so it should be ok 7.0.0_1.
>
$ pkg_version -t
Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
$ pkg_version -t 7.0.0p1 7.0.0_1
It's not.
I know that 7.0.0p1 is major than 7.0.0_1. What I'm asking is if it
really matters, since nobody could download the 7.0.0p1, so they sticked
with plain 7.0.0. If it's an issue for automated scripts I will fix it.
--
Alex
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
> >$ pkg_version -t 7.0.0p1 7.0.0_1
> >
> >It's not.
>
> I know that 7.0.0p1 is major than 7.0.0_1. What I'm asking is if it
> really matters, since nobody could download the 7.0.0p1, so they sticked
> with p
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:39:22PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> Is portsmon down? Been trying to hit if for the last couple days.
>
>
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Yup, hardware failure. I reinstalled it to a new (and faster!) box and
hope everything is working again.
Chee
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:20:56 -0700, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Bill Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> I'm running 6.2 PRERELEASE #2 with my ports tree current to this morning
>> (around 9am GMT-8). i386 with a Pentium 4 3.2Ghz
>>
>> It took some massaging,
Hi,
I work at UNESP - Brazil, a government university of Sao Paulo state.
We are using Asterisk 1.2.9.1_1 and we are experiencing some troubles
with this version regarding Pickupgroups:
- The Asterisk documentation says it can handle groups named 0 up to 63,
but it only supports 0 to 31 (as if t
On Oct 15, 2006, at 4:13 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Well, now I see the problem really is unavailability of
/usr/local/sbin/portintall by some unknown reason on your and
Drew's boxes.
Agreed:
1-ns1# ls -l /usr/local/sbin/portintall
ls: /usr/local/sbin/portintall: No such file or directory
Hi,
I have compiled frox from source code and activate the future that scan for
virus.
When a file don't contain a virus the trancfer hang-up (from proxy to client)
whitout error (for the proxy is all ok).
The system is a Freebsd 6.1.
The problem can be during the check of the buffer i think.
Ta
Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
$ pkg_version -t 7.0.0p1 7.0.0_1
It's not.
I know that 7.0.0p1 is major than 7.0.0_1. What I'm asking is if it
really matters, since nobody could download the 7.0.0p1, so they sticked
w
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:12:34 +0200
Oliver Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a new 4.4 RC1 patchset:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/xfce4.4_ports_06.tar.bz2
>
> Make sure you don't have any by-hand or by former patches modified
> xfce ports - otherwise the patch wi
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:47:44 +0200
Patrick Hurrelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Patrick
can you say where the problem is?
I'm work on a patch for the new dbus depends.
- Martin
> Hi Oliver,
>
> did you already have the chance to update patchset-6 with latest
> changes introduced by Gnome
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
it's not finding CORBA.h
.h:121: error: `CORBA' has not been declared
account.h:121: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `Long' with no type
account.h:121: error: `Long' declared as a `virtual' field
account.h:121: error: expected `;' before "balan
is that how it is supposed to be?
"bsd#" is my root prompt and ">" is my non root prompt
"bsd%" is a zsh prompt
/usr/ports/graphics/imlib
bsd# ls /usr/local/include/C*
/usr/local/include/CORBA-SMALL.h/usr/local/include/CORBA.h
bsd#
~
--with-ssl=
Enable support for SSL. is the di
Whenever I reinstall freeradius-1.1.2, all of my certificates stored in
/usr/local/etc/raddb/certs are removed. I believe this occurs because it is
backing them up from the wrong location:
---> Backing up the old version
tar: etc/raddb/certs/README: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
ta
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> FYI. Rumor has it that the latest beta driver has this fixed, but I
> haven't had time to confirm this yet.
Thanks. I was thinking on whether should I update driver to latest beta
(mainly for compiz-related stuff) but
20 matches
Mail list logo
