On 07/12/2012 11:09, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> With the latest 3.0 version of p5-FreeBSD-PortIndex I get an error at
> the end of portindex run:
>
> Accumulating dependency information:
> .[1000].[2000].[3000].[4000].[5000].[6000].[7000]..
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 09:32, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>> If you're running 2.9 OPTIONSng should be handled correctly. It
>>> > doesn't matter much: the exact format of the OPTIONS variables
>>> > doesn't make much difference to building the INDEX, o
On 2 December 2012 01:36, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
>>> showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and
On 02/12/2012 09:32, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> If you're running 2.9 OPTIONSng should be handled correctly. It
>> > doesn't matter much: the exact format of the OPTIONS variables
>> > doesn't make much difference to building the INDEX, only detecting
>> > when they've been changed.
> # pkg info
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:16:20 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 08:26, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > BTW, I'm seeing this on my machines:
> > Checking timestamps on options makefiles: cache-update: WARNING
> > unknown options file "/var/db/ports/rsync/options" -- ignored
> > cache-update: W
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:49:51 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 08:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > You might want to try ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
> > cache-init(1) will take that half an hour, but after that updating
> > the INDEX will take a minute or so (depending on what has cha
On 02/12/2012 08:26, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> BTW, I'm seeing this on my machines:
> Checking timestamps on options makefiles: cache-update: WARNING unknown
> options file "/var/db/ports/rsync/options" -- ignored
> cache-update: WARNING unknown options file "/var/db/ports/subversion/options"
> --
On 02/12/2012 08:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> You might want to try ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
> cache-init(1) will take that half an hour, but after that updating the
> INDEX will take a minute or so (depending on what has changed in the PT
> since your last update). Also you'll have an INDEX
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:12:45 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 06:50, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > It takes about half an hour on my dog slow intel atom D510. Is there
> > anything in the works to speed up 'make index'? I understand that
> > the slowest part is the evaluation of dependenci
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:50:18 +0200
Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Kevin Oberman
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler
> > wrote:
> >> On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I don't know the details abo
On 02/12/2012 06:50, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> It takes about half an hour on my dog slow intel atom D510. Is there
> anything in the works to speed up 'make index'? I understand that the
> slowest part is the evaluation of dependencies, is that right?
The slow part is parsing around 25,000 Makefile
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
>>> showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
>> showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10 days
>> [2]
>> Is i
On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
> showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10 days
> [2]
> Is it aftermath of the intrusion to the FreeBSD.org cluster?
I
Hi,
I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web
is showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10
days [2]
Is it aftermath of the intrusion to the FreeBSD.org cluster?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^lighttpd-1
[2] http://svnweb
15 matches
Mail list logo