Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Files in ports tree and INDEX are out of sync, because of the -I in > portsnap command. The -I updates INDEX only! I sort of suspected that, but thanks for confirming. That would definitely do it. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700 > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: >> >>> Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local >>> and youll be informed of packages that need updating. >> Sorry to pick on your response, but

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-16 Thread Thomas Backman
On Aug 15, 2009, at 22:58, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: Thanks, guys! However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see late

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Doug Barton wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: Thanks, guys! However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). [r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]# por

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Jason J. Hellenthal
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > > > Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local > > and youll be informed of packages that need updating. > > Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to >

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local > and youll be informed of packages that need updating. Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette: 1. Read the whol

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Jason J. Hellenthal
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:48:53 +0200 Thomas Backman wrote: > > On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > Thomas Backman wrote: > > [...] > >> [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF > >> ---> Checking the package registry database > >> [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '<' > >> dnsmasq

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Thomas Backman wrote: > Thanks, guys! > However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about > portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this > is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). > > [r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]# portsnap -I fet

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
Thomas Backman wrote: However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). libtool-1.5.26 ! Comparison failed This is beca

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread N.J. Mann
In message <6b5b7698-ccd8-48ff-a5fb-0349d4cc1...@exscape.org>, Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote: > > On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Thomas Backman wrote: > > [...] > >> [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF > >> ---> Checking the package registry database > >> [r...

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF ---> Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '<' dnsmasq < ezm3< libtool < python26

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF ---> Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '<' dnsmasq < ezm3< libtool < python26< [r...@chaos ~]# pkg_version | awk '$2 !~ /=

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Thomas Backman wrote: > First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I > won't see your answers! :) > > Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: > 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update > > So, long story short: > > [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF > ---> Checking the package registry

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
N.J. Mann wrote: > Some years ago I tried using portupgrade, but had all sorts of problems > with its database getting corrupted. In desparation I tried portmaster > and have been a very happy since. (Thanks Doug!). Well I don't know about the desperation part, but you're welcome in any case. :

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread N.J. Mann
In message , Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote: > First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I > won't see your answers! :) > > Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: > 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update > > So, long story short: > > [r...@chaos ~]# pk

portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I won't see your answers! :) Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update So, long story short: [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF ---> Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l