Re: package version scheme

2015-09-01 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 1 septembre 2015 14:08:09 -0700 Xin Li wrote: | Hi, | | I hit a conflict between pkg behavior and the Porters' handbook, it | confused me. | | In this example: | | https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefi | le-distfiles.html#idp59327440 | | The handbook

Re: package version scheme

2015-09-01 Thread Xin Li
On 09/01/15 14:16, Xin Li wrote: > On 09/01/15 14:11, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 16:08, Xin Li wrote: > [...] >> I, as sysutils/lsof maintainer, depend on the behavior you see (the >). >> >> Vic Abell uses the letters as "fixup" releases, until a full release, >> for example; >> >> 4.89

Re: package version scheme

2015-09-01 Thread Xin Li
On 09/01/15 14:11, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2015-09-01 16:08, Xin Li wrote: [...] > I, as sysutils/lsof maintainer, depend on the behavior you see (the >). > > Vic Abell uses the letters as "fixup" releases, until a full release, > for example; > > 4.89A -> 4.89B -> 4.89C -> 4.89 -> 4.90A -> 4.

Re: package version scheme

2015-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-09-01 16:08, Xin Li wrote: Hi, I hit a conflict between pkg behavior and the Porters' handbook, it confused me. In this example: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#idp59327440 The handbook suggested that the right PORTVERSION sho

package version scheme

2015-09-01 Thread Xin Li
Hi, I hit a conflict between pkg behavior and the Porters' handbook, it confused me. In this example: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#idp59327440 The handbook suggested that the right PORTVERSION should be 0.7.1.d if DISTVERSION is 0.7.