Re: Proposal of new port www/owncast

On 4/27/21 9:23 AM, CTS - FreeBSD Team wrote: Hello! I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go. On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11 and 12 (amd64). It installs fine and even runs after

Re: Proposal of new port www/owncast

Am 2021-04-27 12:10, schrieb Rodrigo Osorio: Yes, you should open an issue with a patch in the bug tracker Doh! And the link to the issue is: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255439 Thanks! -- Markus Mann, CTS - FreeBSD Team WWW: https://cts-solutions.at/ _

Re: Proposal of new port www/owncast

Am 2021-04-27 12:10, schrieb Rodrigo Osorio: On 4/27/21 9:23 AM, CTS - FreeBSD Team wrote: Hello! I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go. On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11 and 12

Re: Proposal of new port www/owncast

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:23 AM CTS - FreeBSD Team wrote: > > Hello! > > I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable > streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go. > > On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11 > and 12 (amd64). It install

Re: Proposal of new port www/owncast

On 4/27/21 9:23 AM, CTS - FreeBSD Team wrote: Hello! I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go. On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11 and 12 (amd64). It installs fine and even runs after

Proposal of new port www/owncast

Hello! I just created my first FreeBSD port for the small self-hostable streaming server https://owncast.online written in Go. On my own poudriere package build server it build fine for FreeBSD 11 and 12 (amd64). It installs fine and even runs afterwards. How am i supposed to go on from here? S

Re: Illegal instruction on new port mongodb49 on arm64

On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 10:37 +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > I created a new port for mongodb49: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254631 > It compiles fine: https://www.klop.ws/mongodb49-4.9.0.r0.log > > When I run an application I get "

Re: Illegal instruction on new port mongodb49 on arm64

Van: "Micha? Górny" Datum: donderdag, 1 april 2021 10:47 Aan: Ronald Klop , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-...@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: Illegal instruction on new port mongodb49 on arm64 On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 10:37 +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > I created a new

Illegal instruction on new port mongodb49 on arm64

Hi, I created a new port for mongodb49: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254631 It compiles fine: https://www.klop.ws/mongodb49-4.9.0.r0.log When I run an application I get "Illegal Instruction" error. ==

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

On 8/02/2021 2:28 pm, Adam Jimerson wrote: On Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:05:31 PM EST Kubilay Kocak wrote: www/py-adblock [1] as its primary use will be in and for browsers (in this case qutebrowser (also in www) Thanks for your input, that was my main thinking as well as to why it might go un

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

On Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:05:31 PM EST Kubilay Kocak wrote: > www/py-adblock [1] as its primary use will be in and for browsers (in > this case qutebrowser (also in www) Thanks for your input, that was my main thinking as well as to why it might go under the www category. > One may consider

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

On 7/02/2021 1:58 pm, Adam Jimerson wrote: Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct category for such a port. I can easily s

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

> How is the blocking achieved ? Does it hook into the DNS lookups ? > Does it parse webpages/javascript and detect patterns ? Does it > use IP blacklists ? > > www sounds ok, or DNS, if it's DNS-based. net, if it uses IP blacklists. This port is just a python wrapper around Brave browser's adblo

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

Hi! > Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock > (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a > dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct > category for such a port. I can easily see it falling under

Question on figuring out category for new port

Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct category for such a port. I can easily see it falling under net, net-mgmt, or www alt

License question - New port databases/libmswstr

I intend to update my databases/mdbtools port and add a new databases/libmswstr [1] port as a dependency. This new port should allow mdbtools to use indexes of databases in JET4 format. [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27955 The author of libmswstr [2] did not include a license [3] with his

Re: Committer required for a new port security/py-onlykey

Hi! > > I've created a new port to use with hardware password manager OnlyKey. > > It would be super nice if some kind committer could take a look and > > commit it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250601 > Last time for this new port I got a list of

Re: Committer required for a new port security/py-onlykey

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 06:28:35PM +0100, Dmytro Bilokha wrote: Hi, everyone! I've created a new port to use with hardware password manager OnlyKey. It would be super nice if some kind committer could take a look and commit it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250601 T

[NEW PORT] textproc/cast2gif

Hello to all, Could a commiter take a look at Bug 251064 ? Thanks, Nuno Teixeira ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscri

[NEW PORT] textproc/cast2gif: Tool to render Asciinema cast files to GIFs

Hello to all, A tool to render textproc/py-asciinema cast files to GIF. This is a pre-release. Please test it and use https://github.com/katharostech/cast2gif/issues if necessary. Bug 251064 Thanks, Nuno Teixeira

New port: Fast, funny, everyone wanted? new cowsay!!

Hello, New port: games/neo-cowsay written in Go. Just try "--super" option, it's awesome! Take a look at 250771 <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250771> Thanks, Nuno Teixeira ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.o

Committer required for a new port security/py-onlykey

Hi, everyone! I've created a new port to use with hardware password manager OnlyKey. It would be super nice if some kind committer could take a look and commit it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250601 Thanks! -- Dmytro Bilokha dmy...@poste

Re: Could a comitter take a look at new port?

Hi! > I will be very pleased if a commiter could take a look at 250426 > . > I'm very happy that (Open)Diablo2 runs nice on FreeBSD :) Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? _

Could a comitter take a look at new port?

Hello, I will be very pleased if a commiter could take a look at 250426 . I'm very happy that (Open)Diablo2 runs nice on FreeBSD :) Thanks very much, Nuno Teixeira ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: new port - net/quiche

Kurt - huge thanks! On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:14 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248424 > > > > Can anyone take a look? It has been in the queue for 10 days. > > I updated to the new version. > > Thanks, committed! > > -- > p...@opsec.eu

Re: new port - net/quiche

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248424 > > Can anyone take a look? It has been in the queue for 10 days. > I updated to the new version. Thanks, committed! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

new port - net/quiche

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248424 Can anyone take a look? It has been in the queue for 10 days. I updated to the new version. Thanks! -- Junho Choi | https://saturnsoft.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lis

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

gt; > > > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port > textproc/py-j2cli > > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I > will be the > > > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of > sysutil

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be > > the > > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > > to a

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > to allow for Jinja2 template files. Commi

Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hello, A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm to allow for Jinja2 template files. signature.asc

Re: [NEW PORT] unifi-poller

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:35, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > >Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and > > > commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it > > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bug

Re: [NEW PORT] unifi-poller

Hi! > >Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and > > commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247338 Committed, thanks. If you have time, take a look at

Re: [NEW PORT] unifi-poller

Hi! >Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and > commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247338 > >This is my first port so I am not sure if I need to do anyt

[NEW PORT] unifi-poller

Hi Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247338 This is my first port so I am not sure if I need to do anything else to get it committed or

Re: [NEW PORT] PyCharm Professional

Hi! > Would someone please commit this new port to the ports tree? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242705 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.or

[NEW PORT] PyCharm Professional

Hi, Would someone please commit this new port to the ports tree? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242705 Short recap: - it's based on the existing port devel/pycharm-e - it's marked RESTRICTED as its license does not allow redistribution (still waiting for an app

Please review new port shells/ohmyzsh (D25582)

Hello, I've created a port of Oh My Zsh (https://ohmyz.sh/). If there are users of zsh or Oh My Zsh, please check it out, any feedback is welcome. Review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25582 Thanks in advance, Sergey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New port: simh-hpdoc (PR 244395)

Hi! > I hate to bug people about this sort of thing, as I know there is > always a big queue. > > I submitted this PR a few weeks ago. It's simply a documentation > package so shouldn't take long. Done. > It's a dependency for two other ports that I am waiting to submit (see > the PR). I don't

New port: simh-hpdoc (PR 244395)

Hi! I hate to bug people about this sort of thing, as I know there is always a big queue. I submitted this PR a few weeks ago. It's simply a documentation package so shouldn't take long. It's a dependency for two other ports that I am waiting to submit (see the PR). I don't really want to submit

Re: New port: mail/mmh feedback/commiter request

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245346 > > It would be nice to get some feedback and maybe a commiter > for this port. Committed, thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-po

New port: mail/mmh feedback/commiter request

Hi https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245346 It would be nice to get some feedback and maybe a commiter for this port. Thanks satanist ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: creating a new port from github: "_GH0" suffix in the filename

On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, the wise Mathieu Arnold wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:20:20PM +0200, Marco Beishuizen wrote: GH_TAGNAME= g0de4b1c ^ There is an extra g here, commit hash only use hexadecimals. The name of the file is correct, except for the added "_GH0". How can

Re: creating a new port from github: "_GH0" suffix in the filename

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:20:20PM +0200, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > GH_TAGNAME= g0de4b1c ^ There is an extra g here, commit hash only use hexadecimals. > The name of the file is correct, except for the added "_GH0". > How can I download the file without the "_GH0" suffix? The _

creating a new port from github: "_GH0" suffix in the filename

Hi, I'm trying to create a new port which is hosted on github (the luakit development version). The Makefile is just a modified version of the one from www/luakit. The Makefile I got so far is: [...] # Created by: Stefan Hagen # $FreeBSD: head/www/luakit/Makefile 531700 2020-04-14 15:4

Re: ports/243787: [NEW PORT] net/mcjoin: Simple multicast testing application for UNIX

On 2020/03/01 03:35, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> This contribution [0] has been awaiting attention for about four weeks, >> since 2020-02-01 22:20:44 UTC. Are there any friendly, neighborhood >> committers who would be willing and available to take it? >> >> [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/243787 >

Re: ports/243787: [NEW PORT] net/mcjoin: Simple multicast testing application for UNIX

Hi! > This contribution [0] has been awaiting attention for about four weeks, > since 2020-02-01 22:20:44 UTC. Are there any friendly, neighborhood > committers who would be willing and available to take it? > > [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/243787 Done. Thanks for the cool application, I already

ports/243787: [NEW PORT] net/mcjoin: Simple multicast testing application for UNIX

Hello FreeBSD Ports, This contribution [0] has been awaiting attention for about four weeks, since 2020-02-01 22:20:44 UTC. Are there any friendly, neighborhood committers who would be willing and available to take it? [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/243787 -- John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x3

Please commit the patch in Bug 235275 - Multiply bundled GH_TUPLE repositories result in broken links - it holds up one new port

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235275 Thanks, Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[NEW PORT] net-p2p/lidarr: Music collection manager for Usenet and BitTorrent users

Hi all, My apologies if this is not the correct place to post this. Would a committer be available to review this New Port request? portlint and testport are OK. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234233 Regards, Matt ___ freebsd-ports

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On 7/08/2019 6:16 pm, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me that I should be able to make a diff (example 3.1). If someone confirms that I really should not be able to make a diff, I will update the handbook appropriately. New ports should b

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:16:13 + Kralj Karlo wrote: > Jonathan Chen writes: > > Details can be found at: > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html > > > > I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me > that I should be abl

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

Hi! > I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me that > I should be able to make a diff (example 3.1). If someone confirms that > I really should not be able to make a diff, I will update the handbook > appropriately. New ports should be submitted as shar. Changes to exist

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

Jonathan Chen writes: > Details can be found at: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me that I should be able to make a diff (example 3.1). If someone confirms that I really should not

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On 2019-08-06 14:05, Kralj Karlo wrote: I am trying to create a diff of a new port in order that I may submit the port. I believe to have followed the directions from the Porter's Handbook, but the result is not as I had expected. Nothing weird happened between $ svn checkout

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:31, Kralj Karlo wrote: > > I am trying to create a diff of a new port in order that I may submit the > port. > I believe to have followed the directions from the Porter's Handbook, but > the result is not as I had expected. > You cannot update th

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:05:49 -0700 Kralj Karlo wrote I am trying to create a diff of a new port in order that I may submit the port. I believe to have followed the directions from the Porter's Handbook, but the result is not as I had expected. $ portsnap fetch (I didn&#

Creation of a diff of a new port

I am trying to create a diff of a new port in order that I may submit the port. I believe to have followed the directions from the Porter's Handbook, but the result is not as I had expected. $ portsnap fetch (I didn't save the output.) $ portsnap extract (I didn&

Re: PR236858 – [NEW PORT] www/grafana6: Dashboard and graph editor for multiple data stores

Am 28.06.2019 um 15:49 schrieb David W: > HiAny commiter care to look > athttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236858 ?Seems to be > tested and working. testbuild is fine, I will commit it the next minutes. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers

PR236858 – [NEW PORT] www/grafana6: Dashboard and graph editor for multiple data stores

HiAny commiter care to look athttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236858 ?Seems to be tested and working. RegardsDavid ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Re: games/dMagnetic: A new Port (Need help)

Hello Grzegorz, On 5/29/19 7:35 PM, Grzegorz Junka wrote: Hi Thomas, Is the intention of your email to find someone willing to add the games to ports? If yes, could mich, the current maintainer of your game (CC'd) be a good first contact? Also, not sure how much traffic is on freebsd-ga...

Re: games/dMagnetic: A new Port (Need help)

On 20/05/2019 07:14, dettus wrote: Hello. SInce the ports@ mailinglist seems to strip away attachments (as it should), I uploaded the port to my website. Please download it at http://www.dettus.net/dMagnetic/freebsd_games_dMagnetic.tar.gz sha256: df886bd85e30dc983ae7ab8d441db779355c63fe14c2

Re: new port: game/dMagnetic (moved to github, and help needed)

Packages”. Give the bug report a title such as: “New Port: games/dMagnetic: magnetic scrolls interpreter” See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html. Kirk Thank you for your patch. I applied it, and committed it to github after portlint told me that

new port: game/dMagnetic (moved to github, and help needed)

You wake up on a sunny August morning with birds singing, and the air fresh and clear. However, your joints are stiff and you have not woken up in your bedroom as you would have expected. Trying to recall what happened the night before, you manage to piece together a few brief glimpses to give

Re: games/dMagnetic: A new Port (Need help)

Hello. SInce the ports@ mailinglist seems to strip away attachments (as it should), I uploaded the port to my website. Please download it at http://www.dettus.net/dMagnetic/freebsd_games_dMagnetic.tar.gz sha256: df886bd85e30dc983ae7ab8d441db779355c63fe14c2117797c9889f23a9a00a, size=987 bytes.

games/dMagnetic: A new Port (Need help)

Hello. My name is Thomas Dettbarn. Two of my projects editors/dhex and games/nInvaders have already found their way into the FreeBSD ports. Currently, I am working on dMagnetic, A Magic Scrolls Interpreter. This one lets you play classic text adventures such as "The Pawn" or "The Guild of Thie

[NEW PORT] databases/mongodb40-tools: Tools for MongoDB

New port proposal: Tools for MongoDB 4.x PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 PATCH: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ashevchuk/mongodb40-tools-freebsd-port/master/mongodb40-tools.patch Actually, the patch itself (feel free to make the necessary corrections, if the

Re: Committer needed: New port java/wildfly16

Hi! > Could a committer be so kind to review and if it is OK to commit PR236464? > > It's the new version of Wildfly application server, this version does not > superseded former versions. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236464 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101

Committer needed: New port java/wildfly16

Could a committer be so kind to review and if it is OK to commit PR236464? It's the new version of Wildfly application server, this version does not superseded former versions. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236464 Thanks in advance, Simeó Reig _

Re: [new port] Native standalone version of gn build system

Hi! > Gn, chromium build system, now is standalone project. FreeBSD support was > added to source tree recently. > > I propose create a new port devel/gn. I created PR with patch - > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234309. > > Can anyone look on i

[new port] Native standalone version of gn build system

Hi everyone! Gn, chromium build system, now is standalone project. FreeBSD support was added to source tree recently. I propose create a new port devel/gn. I created PR with patch - https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234309. Can anyone look on it? Thanks

Re: New port. QEMU Guest Agent

Ok. Bug: 232949 On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:24 AM Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:44:29 +0300 Eugene Kaltashkin > wrote: > > >I made a port for QEMU Guest Agent. > > > >Git repo of this port at GitHub > https://github.com/aborche/qemu-guest-agent > > >

Re: New port. QEMU Guest Agent

Hi, On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:44:29 +0300 Eugene Kaltashkin wrote: >I made a port for QEMU Guest Agent. > >Git repo of this port at GitHub https://github.com/aborche/qemu-guest-agent > >But i need change original Makefile for qemu port /usr/ports/emulators/qemu >Can you help me ? Sounds cool! Coul

New port. QEMU Guest Agent

Hi guys I made a port for QEMU Guest Agent. Git repo of this port at GitHub https://github.com/aborche/qemu-guest-agent But i need change original Makefile for qemu port /usr/ports/emulators/qemu Can you help me ? Port works on FreeBSD 11/12. Also maybe someone can help me with testing ? -- Be

new port devel/capnproto still awaiting approval

Hi, Any chance of getting this approved? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231500 -felix ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports

Re: pkg-plist and stage directory for new port

Hi Marco, just a few comments about your port stub. Am 14.09.18 um 17:31 schrieb Marco Beishuizen: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, the wise Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> Show us your makefile please. > > The Makefile I have so far: > > PORTNAME=    pgadmin4 > PORTVERSION=    3

New port: selectors2

Hello FreeBSD Python, Are there any friendly neighborhood committers willing and able to take this bug [0]. I would appreciate any feedback or to have it added to the ports tree. Also, the absence of this port is a blocker for updating net-mgmt/py-ncclient to the latest version [1]. [0] [NEW

Re: pkg-plist and stage directory for new port

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, the wise Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: Show us your makefile please. The Makefile I have so far: PORTNAME= pgadmin4 PORTVERSION=3.3 CATEGORIES= databases MASTER_SITES= PGSQL/pgadmin/pgadmin4/v${PORTVERSION}/sour

Re: pkg-plist and stage directory for new port

> Hi, > > In my quest for creating a new port (pgadmin4) I'm having a problem with > creating a working pkg-plist. Seems to me that at least the created binary > should be in the pkg-plist file, in my case "bin/pgAdmin4". But when I do > that, mak

pkg-plist and stage directory for new port

Hi, In my quest for creating a new port (pgadmin4) I'm having a problem with creating a working pkg-plist. Seems to me that at least the created binary should be in the pkg-plist file, in my case "bin/pgAdmin4". But when I do that, make check-plist results in an error: ==

Re: How long does a new port sit in the Bugs queue?

Hi! > I created a new port for a Perl library I'm using, and then added an > entry for it to freebsd-bugs. This was back on April 24th. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227751 > > My addition has been sitting in the queue in "New" status si

How long does a new port sit in the Bugs queue?

I created a new port for a Perl library I'm using, and then added an entry for it to freebsd-bugs. This was back on April 24th. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227751 My addition has been sitting in the queue in "New" status since then. I'm in no rush to ge

Re: request for a new port + package

t;>>> On 09.04.2018 14:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: >>>> >>>> how do i place a request for a new port + package? >>>>> the sources for my requested tool are available at >>>>> http://www.t3x.org/files/zenlisp.zip and the author of that tool

Re: request for a new port + package

On 7/5/18 7:03 am, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 04:22:32 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: On 9/4/18 7:15 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On 09.04.2018 14:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: how do i place a request for a new port + package? the sources for my requested tool are available at

Re: request for a new port + package

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 04:22:32 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: >On 9/4/18 7:15 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> On 09.04.2018 14:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: >> >>> how do i place a request for a new port + package? >>> the sources for my requested tool are availabl

Re: request for a new port + package

20.04.2018 3:22, Julian Elischer wrote: >> The package is created automatically once new port is created and added >> to FreeBSD Ports collection. You can create and submit new port yourself, >> just read https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ >

Re: request for a new port + package

On 9/4/18 7:15 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On 09.04.2018 14:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: how do i place a request for a new port + package? the sources for my requested tool are available at http://www.t3x.org/files/zenlisp.zip and the author of that tool has granted permission to move it from the

Re: request for a new port + package

On 09.04.2018 14:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > how do i place a request for a new port + package? > the sources for my requested tool are available at > http://www.t3x.org/files/zenlisp.zip and the author of that tool has > granted permission to move it from the existing "publi

request for a new port + package

how do i place a request for a new port + package? the sources for my requested tool are available at http://www.t3x.org/files/zenlisp.zip and the author of that tool has granted permission to move it from the existing "public domain" license to any &quo

Re: Committer needed for new port (lang/J)

Thanks for the quick turnaround! -- João Neves On 8 April 2018 at 11:41, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I submitted a port a while ago and I'd appreciate if someone with some > > spare cycles could take a look at it and, if there are no objections, > > commit it into the tree. > > > > https://b

Re: Committer needed for new port (lang/J)

Hi! > I submitted a port a while ago and I'd appreciate if someone with some > spare cycles could take a look at it and, if there are no objections, > commit it into the tree. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226186 Done, thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Committer needed for new port (lang/J)

Hi, I submitted a port a while ago and I'd appreciate if someone with some spare cycles could take a look at it and, if there are no objections, commit it into the tree. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226186 Cheers, -- João Neves __

committer needed for [NEW PORT] mail/ratelimit-policyd

My new port needs committer with few minutes of time. It is a very simple sender rate limit policy daemon for Postfix written in Perl. Customised to work with modern Perl version on FreeBSD. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 Kind regards Miroslav Lachman

Re: Committer needed for new port (net/nuster)

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:06:55PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 21.03.2018 um 00:39 schrieb Felix Hanley: > > There is a new port (net/nuster) awaiting approval at > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 If there are no > > suggestions could som

Re: Committer needed for new port (net/nuster)

Am 21.03.2018 um 00:39 schrieb Felix Hanley: > There is a new port (net/nuster) awaiting approval at > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 If there are no > suggestions could someone commit it please. Committed

Committer needed for new port (net/nuster)

Hi all, There is a new port (net/nuster) awaiting approval at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 If there are no suggestions could someone commit it please. -felix ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https

Re: committer needed for new port sysutils/tmux23

Matthias Andree wrote on 2018/03/20 10:44: yuri@ has committed this, thanks. Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@fre

Re: committer needed for new port sysutils/tmux23

yuri@ has committed this, thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Committer needed for new port (databases/go-carbon)

Hi! > Can someone take a look at > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226732 suggestions for > improvements are welcome. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 2 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd

committer needed for new port sysutils/tmux23

I submitted this port 2017-11-15. Can somebody commit it please? sysutils/tmux23 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223685 We are using it on all our machines. Kind regards Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list htt

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >